Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $41,910
51%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 51%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: silenceamerica

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • We need a Fairness Doctrine for media

    07/11/2007 3:52:16 PM PDT · by RWR8189 · 41 replies · 1,181+ views
    Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | July 11, 2007 | BRUCE CHAPMAN
    Liberals are hailing a report that calls for federal regulations to end the "structural imbalance in political talk radio." Two think tanks, the Center for American Progress and the Free Press, complain that more than 90 percent of the programs on talk radio feature conservative hosts and themes while only 10 percent are "progressive." Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has promised to examine the report's recommendations for possible legislation and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., says flatly, "It's time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they're in a better...
  • Campaign Finance Reform’s War on Political Freedom - An ongoing danger...

    07/05/2007 8:52:36 PM PDT · by neverdem · 14 replies · 412+ views
    City Journal ^ | 1 July 2007 | Bradley A. Smith
    An ongoing danger, despite two recent court victoriesIn February 2006, Norm Feck learned that the city of Parker, Colorado was thinking about annexing his neighborhood, Parker North. Feck attended a meeting on the annexation, realized that it would mean more bureaucracy, and concluded that it wouldn’t be in Parker North residents’ interest. Together with five other Parker North locals, he wrote letters to the editor, handed out information sheets, formed an Internet discussion group, and printed up anti-annexation yard signs, which soon began sprouting throughout the neighborhood. That’s when annexation supporters took action—not with their own public campaign, but with...
  • A Dagger in the First Amendment

    07/04/2007 7:21:25 PM PDT · by neverdem · 27 replies · 1,357+ views
    realclearpolitics.com ^ | July 04, 2007 | Robert Samuelson
    "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." -- The First Amendment WASHINGTON -- The Fourth of July is an apt moment to reflect upon one of the great underreported stories of our time: the rise of regulated speech. Glance at the First Amendment, but do not think it still applies. Large bodies of political speech are now governed by laws, agency regulations, court decisions and lawyerly interpretations. Speech has become un-free. This does...
  • Campaign Finance Reform's War On Political Freedom (Elitists Seeks To Throttle Grassroots Alert)

    07/03/2007 4:41:20 AM PDT · by goldstategop · 3 replies · 454+ views
    City Journal ^ | 07/01/2007 | Bradley Smith
    In February 2006, Norm Feck learned that the city of Parker, Colorado was thinking about annexing his neighborhood, Parker North. Feck attended a meeting on the annexation, realized that it would mean more bureaucracy, and concluded that it wouldn’t be in Parker North residents’ interest. Together with five other Parker North locals, he wrote letters to the editor, handed out information sheets, formed an Internet discussion group, and printed up anti-annexation yard signs, which soon began sprouting throughout the neighborhood. That’s when annexation supporters took action—not with their own public campaign, but with a legal complaint against Feck and his...
  • The Fairness Doctrine: What Really Happened on Capitol Hill

    07/02/2007 7:47:00 AM PDT · by Mike Bates · 28 replies · 1,305+ views
    AIM Special Report ^ | 7/2/2007 | Accuracy in Media
    Craig Crawford of Congressional Quarterly, a news analyst for NBC, MSNBC and CNBC, warns that "Unless broadcasters take steps to voluntarily balance their programming, they can expect a return of fairness rules if Democrats keep control of Congress and win the White House next year." The Rep. Mike Pence amendment, adopted by a vote of 309-115, was to the Financial Services Appropriations bill. It prohibits funds from being used by the Federal Communications Commission to impose the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters. But it only applies to fiscal year 2008 dollars and there is no plan by the current Republican-dominated FCC...
  • Wallace, Gallagher Bust Mark Green on His Fairness Doctrine Double-Talk

    07/01/2007 10:35:59 AM PDT · by governsleastgovernsbest · 24 replies · 1,290+ views
    NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein
    Chris Wallace and Mike Gallagher did a good job of exposing Mark Green's double-talk on the Fairness Doctrine on today's Fox News Sunday. Green, who with his brother have brought Air America out of bankruptcy, was in to debate the issue against conservative talk-show host Gallagher. But when Wallace put it to Green that liberals have plenty of outlets for their views "without having the government mandate that they appear on radio," Green's answer was astounding. AIR AMERICA'S MARK GREEN: I don't want the government to mandate that.Really? Expanding on his answer, Green said he doesn't favor the Fairness Doctrine,...
  • McCain introduces talk radio legislation

    06/29/2007 3:04:29 PM PDT · by Baladas · 49 replies · 1,739+ views
    The Business Journal ^ | June 29, 2007 | Mike Sunnucks
    Arizona Sen. John McCain has introduced federal legislation to protect talk radio shows from the reinstatement of past rules that required dissenting voices be given equal time on their shows. McCain and fellow GOP Senators John Thune of South Dakota and Norm Coleman of Minnesota have put forward legislation preventing the reinstatement of the 'Fairness Doctrine'. The Fairness Doctrine was done away with in 1987 but previously required political radio shows to offer equal time to opposing viewpoints as part of their Federal Communications Commission licenses. A number of Democrats and liberal advocates want the Fairness Doctrine put back in...
  • House Moves to Prohibit Return of Broadcast 'Fairness Doctrine,' Just in Case

    06/29/2007 2:39:39 PM PDT · by Baladas · 15 replies · 783+ views
    Congressional Quarterly ^ | June 29, 2007 | CQ Staff
    The House voted Thursday to bar the Federal Communications Commission from reinstating the broadcast “fairness doctrine” even though there are no legislative or regulatory proposals to bring back the rule. Mike Pence, R-Ind., a former conservative radio talk show host, offered an amendment to the bill funding federal financial entities (HR 2829) that would block the FCC from spending money to restore the mandate. The rule, repealed 20 years ago, required broadcasters to present controversial issues in a balanced manner. During floor debate on the spending bill, José E. Serrano, D-N.Y., chairman of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations...
  • Pence KILLS the Fairness Doctrine...

    06/28/2007 8:29:12 PM PDT · by Valin · 82 replies · 3,760+ views
    Townhall ^ | 6/28/07 | Kevin McCullough
    Congressman Mike Pence led the charge in the House of Representatives that effectively headed Feinstein, Kerry, and Durbin off at the pass. By adding an amendment to the Financial Services and General Government bill. His amendment will disallow any federal funds to be used to carry out any enforcement of a revived "Fairness Doctrine." It passed 309-115... Meaning - even a major chunk of Democrats thought the idea of reviving the ancient rule that would in essence stifle most free speech in on-air capacities - was a really stupid idea. Pence had this to say upon the overwhelming victorious vote...
  • Socializing the Free Market of Ideas

    06/28/2007 7:32:29 PM PDT · by indigo5 · 144+ views
    BC Magazine ^ | 6/28/07 | John Bambenek
    There is a latent idea that the public is unable to come to the "correct" conclusions on policy because talk radio is indoctrinating them. This vicious, un-American and treasonous idea is unworthy of political debate in this country. People can be trusted to make up their own minds and much research indicates that people listen to conservative talk radio not to make up their minds, but because their minds are already made up. If people can't be trusted to make their own minds up, then we ought to be having a discussion on repealing the right to vote, not about...
  • Fairness Doctrine” is simply anti-American

    06/28/2007 7:26:47 PM PDT · by eth3l · 9 replies · 881+ views
    GOPublius.com ^ | 06/28/2007 | Publius
    Recently, Senator Dianne Feinstein endorsed the reinstatement of the “Fairness Doctrine”. We blogged about that here. John Kerry has now jumped on the bandwagon. In 1993 a similar campaign was launched and failed. Sen. Feinsten’s proposal in 2007 should, similarly, fail. The Doctrine suggested is anti-American and stings at the liberties we hold dear. History of the “Fairness Doctrine” Originally, the “Fairness Doctrine” was a regulation imposed by the FCC upon broadcasters which required broadcasters to present both sides of a contraversial story. The rationale was that broadcast airwaves were held in the public trust and, as such, should facilitate...
  • Fairness Doctrine hammered 309-115

    06/28/2007 3:54:50 PM PDT · by rface · 238 replies · 10,832+ views
    The Hill ^ | June 28, 2007 | Alexander Bolton
    At the end of Thursday’s debate, Democratic House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (Wis.) agreed with Republicans that the government should not regulate conservative radio hosts such as Limbaugh and Hannity......“We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,” he said. “Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton.......” The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday ( June 28, 2007 )to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from using taxpayer dollars to impose the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters who feature conservative radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity....
  • Sen. Dick Durbin Responds: Fairness Doctrine

    06/28/2007 2:55:13 PM PDT · by GRRRRR · 49 replies · 1,449+ views
    “It’s time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine,” said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). “I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they’re in a better position to make a decision.” When I heard and read this, I sent my Senator an email reminding him that this country still has a Constitution and that WE THE PEOPLE would NOT be silenced. Some other words to the effect that only cowards want to silence debate and if you can't win electorally then you have to legislate ... yadda yadda yadda, you get the idea. See...
  • MUZZLES OFF (SPEECH COPS LOSE ONE)

    06/28/2007 2:39:48 PM PDT · by neverdem · 1 replies · 518+ views
    NY Post ^ | June 28, 2007 | GEORGE F. WILL
    LET us hope that Su preme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, who is rarely right about First Amendment matters, was right about what he said in April. During oral arguments about a challenge to a use of the McCain-Feingold law to suppress political speech, Breyer, who considers the suppression constitutional, said to the challenger: "If we agree with you in this case, goodbye McCain-Feingold." The challenger was a small group of Wisconsin citizens who, by their grass-roots lobbying for their political views, tried to commit the offense - the crime, actually - of influencing their U.S. senators during what the Federal...
  • Free speech is unfair to losers

    06/28/2007 11:48:13 AM PDT · by rhema · 38 replies · 1,521+ views
    American Thinker ^ | June 28, 2007 | James Lewis
    Several of my liberal friends have a funny conversational tic: Whenever the talk wanders into certain topics, they abruptly switch off --- change the subject, or urgently go off to do something else. We're friends, so I never try to push them back to that dangerous little "Eeeek!" moment. But it's just as if they have a little thermometer in their heads, and when things get dangerous, the red line goes way up and all that mercury threatens to squirt out of the top. You can practically see it happening right in front of your eyes. That's what Sigmund Freud...
  • High court: Firms are people, too

    06/27/2007 9:40:02 AM PDT · by BGHater · 12 replies · 606+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 27 June 2007 | David Lazarus
    The Supreme Court loosened restrictions on campaign financing this week by ruling that corporations and unions are entitled to run a wider variety of political ads in the final weeks of federal elections. This was good news for corporations and unions. And bad news for Shannon Tracey. Tracey is local projects director of Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County, a grassroots group dedicated to repealing the notion of corporate personhood -- a legal distinction that grants constitutional rights to businesses and other organizations. "It's awful that the court is continuing to uphold the idea that companies have what should be rights...
  • Dems Eager to Regulate Talk Radio, Pence Plans to Defeat Fairness Doctrine

    06/27/2007 9:32:27 AM PDT · by DCJeanGrey · 45 replies · 1,832+ views
    Townhall.com ^ | June 27, 2007 | Amanda Carpenter
    Prominent Democrats want to revive a policy to require broadcasters to present multiple viewpoints on controversial issues, spurred by complaints that talk radio has unfairly impacted the national immigration debate. An article published Wednesday by The Hill quoted Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D.-Ill.),stating: “It's time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they're in a better position to make a decision.” The Fairness Doctrine was a Federal Communication Commission regulation that dates back to 1947. Under the regulation, station licensees were considered “public trustees” that had an...
  • Censorship Disguised as Reinstitution of the Fairness Doctrine [how it could happen]

    06/26/2007 7:26:23 AM PDT · by DeweyCA · 4 replies · 458+ views
    I am worried. This is not my usual state of mind but so many signs point to trouble. There are various things of concern, such as the Immigration Bill, and more obscure issues, such as the Trans-North American Highway, which may have the effect of giving up our sovereignty. I am worried about what is happening to talk-radio in this country. Hopefully it does not resemble Hugo Chavez’s actions in Venezuela. If you report anything against his regime you are shut down. The assault against talk-radio here is not quite as drastic as that of the Chavez assault. It could...
  • Court loosens limits on election ads (Goodbye to 30 and 60 day restrictions on issue ads!)

    06/25/2007 8:46:09 AM PDT · by neverdem · 125 replies · 2,166+ views
    yahoo.com ^ | June 25, 2007 | MARK SHERMAN
    Associated Press The Supreme Court loosened restrictions Monday on corporate- and union-funded television ads that air close to elections, weakening a key provision of a landmark campaign finance law. The court, split 5-4, upheld an appeals court ruling that an anti-abortion group should have been allowed to air ads during the final two months before the 2004 elections. The case involved advertisements that Wisconsin Right to Life was prevented from broadcasting. The ads asked voters to contact the state's two senators, Democrats Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, and urge them not to filibuster President Bush's judicial nominees. Feingold, a co-author...
  • Unfairness Doctrine

    06/25/2007 8:05:29 AM PDT · by flixxx · 43 replies · 1,291+ views
    national review online ^ | 6 25 07 | editors
    Unfairness Doctrine By The Editors Remember Jim Hightower? We didn’t think so. He was the former Texas state official who was, for a few minutes, the Left’s great hope for a liberal talk-radio host to challenge the domination of Rush Limbaugh. It didn’t work out. Neither did former New York governor Mario Cuomo, another failed radio talker. And neither did, most recently, Air America, the attempt to build an entire network of liberal talk. Nothing has worked too successfully for liberal political talkers. Rush, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham, among others, are as dominant as ever. The only thing that...