Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fact check: Is China the main climate change culprit? [barf]
Deutsche Welle ^ | 06.30.2021 | Uta Steinwehr

Posted on 06/30/2021 8:59:17 AM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Tell It Right

No it’s not real.

If it is there is zero data for it.

If you have some, I’d like to hear it.

The zealots are not able to even present data or answer questions.

So if you have some and could actually present it and discuss it that’d be great.


21 posted on 06/30/2021 10:23:36 AM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
I 100% agree with you that the zealots are unhinged. But I don't conflate that with the data, which is real. For the record, I also don't conflate warming with pollution. Especially when talking about CO2. CO2 is NOT a pollutant and I hate them talking about it like it is. I agree with maybe 10% of the Dims' push to lower pollution in certain circumstances (i.e. a particular factory). I don't agree with them pushing factories to purchase carbon credits from Al Gore or Tesla, all while claiming it keeps global warming from causing blizzards and such.


I mean, the data at best shows a 1 degree rise across a century or so. Is that warming? Yes. Will it warm enough to make the ancient city of Ephesus back to being a coastal city (it was before the Dark Age and Little Ice Age lowered sea levels)? I don't know. Did all Hell break loose the last two times it warmed like that? Nope. (The next time you read Paul's letter to the Ephesians, think about the fact that it was a port city 2,000 years ago, now is not, evidence the earth has cooled a lot more in the past 2,000 years than it has warmed up.)

22 posted on 06/30/2021 10:41:25 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The bigger the population, the less emissions, evidently. Convenient. I’m sure this is a CCP approved and paid for author.


23 posted on 06/30/2021 10:43:28 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Thanks, yes.

I’m actually for decreasing air pollution, who isn’t.

“I Mean, the data at best shows a 1 degree rise across a century or so. Is that warming?”

So it’s claimed.

What is the standard deviation?

How is the data validated?


24 posted on 06/30/2021 10:48:36 AM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

I’ll see if I can find the data. I had to ignore the tons of “data” from thermometers set too close to air conditioning units and stuff like that. They should be ashamed of themselves.


25 posted on 06/30/2021 11:07:28 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Impossible! Most of China’s people aren’t white. Therefore they can’t be to blame.


26 posted on 06/30/2021 1:21:04 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

That’ll be a tough one for the Germans to swallow.


27 posted on 06/30/2021 1:24:49 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Mao instituted a program in the 1950’s which had people create tens of thousands, if not more, small smelting furnaces in their yards and neighborhoods.

According to this article (A term I use lightly), all the carbon dioxide produced from these home-grown furnaces is still in the atmosphere, now joined by Red China’s modern manufacturing facilities (many of which lack basic CO2 capturing features).

Also you have hundreds of millions of Chinese people who smoke cigarettes and pipes, and have for hundreds of years, if not more. Add this CO2, Carbon Monoxide and Methane discharge to the atmosphere and you get high readings.

An article in “Scientific American”? Retitle this magazine as “Scientific Un-American”. They’ve been that way for decades.


28 posted on 07/16/2021 7:40:32 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson