It had been months since I had watched Hannity. It was an interesting show tonight. Merchan was unbelievably unfair and allowed a sharp increase in prosecutor dishonesty.
Overall, your post was a lot more negative about Trump’s chances than Turley’s, but having the last word does work to a certain extent for Bragg. It’s possible for Bragg to get a conviction. Nobody knows exactly what will happen.
There are quite a few conceited blowhards here posting that they know what the jury is going to do. Maybe they hope they will guess right and will enjoy gloating. It’s possible they will convict, but I am skeptical.
Was there any attempt to move it to a fairer jurisdiction by the defense?
Yes but "judge" ruled hell no. A lunatic like Merchan might actually believe Trump is getting a fair trial, because Voir Dire in Manhattan guarantees an impartial jury.
It's worse than that. Merchan is peddling legal nonsense to confuse the jury, and I don't know if anybody on the defense objected to the jury instructions.
There is only a 10% chance of getting one pro-Trump juror.
The jury pool area voted 90% for Biden. If there was only one juror your statement would be true. However, there are 12. Probability of 12 guilty votes .9^12=0.282429536481. So the probability of at least one not guilty vote on the first try is about 7 out of 10. On the second vote the probability of 12 guilty votes could increase. For example, if one juror voted not guilty on the first vote, the 11 TDS jurors could try to "convince" the "heretic" to join the others so they can go home. If they are all Biden voters that makes conviction very likely.
And if the jurors vote differently on different charges (there are 34 essentially identical counts) that would make conviction on at least one of the counts more likely. There is a lot we don't know about the jurors.