It’s actually in the article 35% Perfect example of media bias Another headline could be: More than a third of Republicans more likely to vote for Trump
It seems that everyone in the legal community has an idea on how to get SCOTUS involved in this case except for Trump’s lawyers. Is Alina at the beauty salon?
"The guilty verdict against former President Donald Trump reached by a Manhattan jury on Thursday could ultimately be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, legal experts said."
“The issue is how to get out of the New York system and bring the case to the Supreme Court, which may or may not take it up,” Levin wrote on Thursday night. “That is why I look to Bush v Gore, where the S Ct decided to step in BECAUSE it was a presidential election.”
Right, and that is what we got, and what we get there, seconds long videos of what in the headline sounds like will be actually getting to watch what happened rather than cherry picked bits and pieces.
A great op-ed and news source would post video's and speeches in their entity AND then they would break up the video clips and speech quotes into pieces as they address each point.
Few if any sources do the former. Some do the latter. Some just make things up.
There are several videos totaling 2 minutes and 23 seconds. You have to wait for all of them to load to see that there is not just one that only totals “seconds”.
I agree-one problem. It’s Gateway and DiNiro is a ‘disgraced’ actor? He’s quite accomplished wouldn’t you say? It’s the gateways that aren’t buying us anything
DeNiro's politics is indeed a disgrace. Add to that at the very least are the Fockers movies, not just one disgraceful Fockers movie, but three.
And I thank Gateway for giving us excerpts of this fool making a fool out of himself.