Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Machinery Of The 'Marijuana Munchies'
Science Daily ^ | December 26, 2005

Posted on 12/27/2005 7:26:46 AM PST by billorites

Marijuana--or more specifically its active ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol--has a well-documented tendency to stimulate hunger. And while scientists have traced this property to cannabinoid receptors in the brain, they have had little understanding of the neural circuitry underlying this effect.

Understanding this circuitry has important practical implications because blocking the cannabinoid receptor, CB1, offers a promising approach to treating obesity. One such compound, rimonabant (trade name AcompliaTM) is already undergoing clinical testing.

In an article in the December 22, 2005, issue of Neuron, Young-Hwan Jo and colleagues report how the circuitry of CB1 is integrated with signaling by the appetite-suppressing hormone leptin. The CB1 receptor is normally triggered by natural regulatory molecules, called endocannabinoids.

In their studies, the researchers concentrated on the lateral hypothalamus (LH) of the brain, known to be a center of control of food intake. Their studies involved detailed electrophysiological measurements of the effects of specific neurons that they had identified in previous studies as being important in endocannabinoid signaling.

Their studies revealed that activation of CB1 receptors, as by endocannabinoid molecules, induced these neurons to be rendered more excitable by a mechanism called "depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition" (DSI).

What's more, they found that leptin inhibits DSI. However, they found that leptin did not interfere with the CB1 receptors themselves. Rather, leptin "short-circuits" the endocannabinoid effects by inhibiting pore-like channels in the neurons that regulate the flow of calcium into the neurons. Such calcium is necessary for the synthesis of endocannabinoids.

In further studies of mice genetically altered to be leptin deficient, the researchers found the DSI to be more prolonged than in normal mice. Thus, they said, the findings "implicate this mechanism for leptin receptor/endocannabinoid signaling in contributing to the maintenance of weight balance...." The researchers also included that "upregulation of endocannabinoid signaling in the LH may explain, at least in part, the increased body weight consistent with a prior report of elevated endocannabinoids" in such leptin-deficient mice.

The researchers concluded that their findings "are consistent with the hypothesis that the integration of endocannabinoid and leptin signaling regulates the excitability of neurons on appetite-related circuits."

They also wrote that "the cellular mechanisms of recently developed antiobesity drugs, such as rimonabant, may include decreased endocannabinoid signaling and hence decreased excitability of LH circuits related to appetite, even in the context of leptin insufficiency or resistance."


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: marijuana; medicalmarijuana; potheads; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-218 next last
To: Know your rights
I can't offhand think of one who hasn't resorted to personal attacks (albeit not all are as low as Clint's).

Yeah, just got dismissed as a "newbie lightweight" on our last thread (Mexican gangs forcing locals to grow drugs) by one of FR's leading WODies - but not until he demonstrated the irrelevancy and evasiveness of his arguments. People that understand logic and reason can judge for themselves when perusing older threads.

81 posted on 12/27/2005 8:48:02 AM PST by Freedom_no_exceptions (No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR
Overweight, like much else, is being overmedicalized ... but I'd prefer not to let the morbidly obese die before attaining the necessary willpower.
82 posted on 12/27/2005 8:49:01 AM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
This sounds like the liberal attitude toward guns. Is this your take on guns as well? Why are you at Free Republic?

Hit a nerve did I?

It's precisely because I am in favor of an individual and healthy 2nd. Amendment that I am not in favor of legalizing pot at this time. The rise in crimes of public violence and assassinations began with Kennedy signing the Community Mental Health Centers Act of 1963 that let the mentally ill out on the street. The rise of drug abuse, crime and violence was a result.

ALL of the notorious cases of gun violence in this country, since the Sixties, have been committed by the mentally ill being able to wander the streets of this country. These mentally ill also drove the increase in drug abuse. The mentally ill are the reason that the 2nd Amendment is being infringed. Or is that too high a concept to wrap your drug addled brain around?

So shove your, "Why are you here?" where it belongs, you friggin ignorant moron!

83 posted on 12/27/2005 8:49:33 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_no_exceptions
People that understand logic and reason can judge for themselves when perusing older threads.

I agree ... but it never hurts to highlight WODdies' lack of logic and reason.

84 posted on 12/27/2005 8:50:19 AM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR

re: getting off your dead butt for some exercise and pushing away from the table before you feel full

Hey, you don't have to get personal here.


85 posted on 12/27/2005 8:50:50 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
"However those who are severely mentally ill do not do well on marijuana. As I've posted before, when society has a handle on the mentally ill, even if it's only re-institutionalizing them, I might agree to a limited use of pot. But if you think I am going to concede to anyone being able to cruise on down to the 7-11 for a pack of nugs, you're wrong. Take another hit, man."


I guarantee you that mentally ill people would be worse on alcohol or caffeine but I don't see liquor stores doing psychiatric screenings.

There is absolutely no good argument why marijuana is illegal but alcohol/tobacco isn't. Except, of course, for the fact that it would be difficult to tax.
86 posted on 12/27/2005 8:51:05 AM PST by varyouga (I no longer fear death. I only fear the day when the DUmmies take over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
Ah,,got ya, thanks.

Just an aside, my unscientific survey of these deep thinkers indicates about a 98% user rate among these posters. Most claim they don't do it anymore. None volunteers to report to jail to begin their payment to society for the exact crime they advocate others be jailed for.

Hypocrisy seems to go hand in hand with posting childish comments.

87 posted on 12/27/2005 8:51:44 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights; elbucko
never hurts to highlight WODdies' lack of logic and reason.

They usually do a good job of that themselves. Like post 83 above.

88 posted on 12/27/2005 8:54:00 AM PST by Freedom_no_exceptions (No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
These mentally ill also drove the increase in drug abuse.

If you can show that the numerical increase in drug users is not substantially larger than the number of persons released by the Community Mental Health Centers Act, we'll have something to talk about. Otherwise you'll have failed to account for the former number.

89 posted on 12/27/2005 8:54:22 AM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: billorites

What word do all pot smokers say? Heeere!


90 posted on 12/27/2005 8:57:51 AM PST by doctor noe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
When they become violent and hurt others, not just themselves.

Violent pot-smoking criminals aren't prosecuted for their crimes?

Who knew?

91 posted on 12/27/2005 8:58:17 AM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
you friggin ignorant moron!

Always an effective posting strategy.

92 posted on 12/27/2005 8:58:57 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Yawn. Isn't a little early for the seventh grade comments?

I'm posting to the level of the argument.

93 posted on 12/27/2005 8:59:11 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: doctor noe
What word do all pot smokers say? Heeere!

Dave Chappelle, is that you? :)

94 posted on 12/27/2005 9:00:16 AM PST by Freedom_no_exceptions (No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

Can't you just hear him saying it?


95 posted on 12/27/2005 9:01:50 AM PST by Xenalyte (Tom Cruise is in my closet and he won't come out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: sandbar

Yes...that is exactly part of the challenge with acute testing.


96 posted on 12/27/2005 9:02:00 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
I'm posting to the level of the argument.

Try posting to the level of this argument: "If you can show that the numerical increase in drug users is not substantially larger than the number of persons released by the Community Mental Health Centers Act, we'll have something to talk about. Otherwise you'll have failed to account for the former number."

97 posted on 12/27/2005 9:02:02 AM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
I'm posting to the level of the argument.

Correction, you SET the level of the argument.

Oh no! They made me do it! They made me post like that!

LOL

98 posted on 12/27/2005 9:02:34 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights; mel

Don't forget post # 32 also...


99 posted on 12/27/2005 9:04:35 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Always an effective posting strategy.

Moron is as good as any for hose who propose the legalization of drugs before the national problem of the homeless and mentally ill on the street is addressed. The Pro-Pot croud are putting their own desire for personal pleasure ahead of our personal freedoms. The 2nd. Amendment being one of them.

100 posted on 12/27/2005 9:04:56 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson