Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government Goons Murder Puppies!The drug war goes to the dogs.
Reason ^ | April 2006 | Radley Balko

Posted on 04/05/2006 12:57:02 PM PDT by JTN

In the course of researching paramilitary drug raids, I’ve found some pretty disturbing stuff. There was a case where a SWAT officer stepped on a baby’s head while looking for drugs in a drop ceiling. There was one where an 11-year-old boy was shot at point-blank range. Police have broken down doors, screamed obscenities, and held innocent people at gunpoint only to discover that what they thought were marijuana plants were really sunflowers, hibiscus, ragweed, tomatoes, or elderberry bushes. (It’s happened with all five.)

Yet among hundreds of botched raids, the ones that get me most worked up are the ones where the SWAT officers shoot and kill the family dog.

I have two dogs, which may have something to do with it. But I’m not alone. A colleague tells me that when he and other libertarian commentators speak about the 1993 raid on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco many people tend to doubt the idea that the government was out of line when it invaded, demolished, and set fire to a home of peaceful and mostly innocent people. But when the speaker mentions that the government also slaughtered two dogs during the siege, eyes light up, the indifferent get angry, and skeptics come around. Puppycide, apparently, goes too far.

One of the most appalling cases occurred in Maricopa County, Arizona, the home of Joe Arpaio, self-proclaimed “toughest sheriff in America.” In 2004 one of Arpaio’s SWAT teams conducted a bumbling raid in a Phoenix suburb. Among other weapons, it used tear gas and an armored personnel carrier that later rolled down the street and smashed into a car. The operation ended with the targeted home in flames and exactly one suspect in custody—for outstanding traffic violations.

But for all that, the image that sticks in your head, as described by John Dougherty in the alternative weekly Phoenix New Times, is that of a puppy trying to escape the fire and a SWAT officer chasing him back into the burning building with puffs from a fire extinguisher. The dog burned to death.

In a massive 1998 raid at a San Francisco housing co-op, cops shot a family dog in front of its family, then dragged it outside and shot it again.

When police in Fremont, California, raided the home of medical marijuana patient Robert Filgo, they shot his pet Akita nine times. Filgo himself was never charged.

Last October police in Alabama raided a home on suspicion of marijuana possession, shot and killed both family dogs, then joked about the kill in front of the family. They seized eight grams of marijuana, equal in weight to a ketchup packet.

In January a cop en route to a drug raid in Tampa, Florida, took a short cut across a neighboring lawn and shot the neighbor’s two pooches on his way. And last May, an officer in Syracuse, New York, squeezed off several shots at a family dog during a drug raid, one of which ricocheted and struck a 13-year-old boy in the leg. The boy was handcuffed at gunpoint at the time.

There was a dog in the ragweed bust I mentioned, too. He got lucky: He was only kicked across the room.

I guess the P.R. lesson here for drug war opponents and civil libertarians is to emphasize the plight of the pooch. America’s law-and-order populace may not be ready to condemn the practice of busting up recreational pot smokers with ostentatiously armed paramilitary police squads, even when the SWAT team periodically breaks into the wrong house or accidentally shoots a kid. I mean, somebody was probably breaking the law, right?

But the dog? That loyal, slobbery, lovable, wide-eyed, fur-lined bag of unconditional love?

Dammit, he deserves better.

Radley Balko is a policy analyst with the Cato Institute.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: badcopnodonut; banglist; bongbrigade; doggieping; donutwatch; drugskilledbelushi; itchyandscratchy; jackbootedthugs; jbt; jbts; liberdopiancrap; libertarians; totalitarians; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last
To: JTN

kill the dog is standard policy on any LEO raid. a dog is considered the first line of defense of any home. the dog is silenced before anything else happens in a raid. agents are not worried about being attacked by the dog, they are worried that the dog may alert the owner.
i didn't see it mentioned yet, but randy weaver's dog was shot first at ruby ridge also.


41 posted on 04/05/2006 1:54:35 PM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

How did you know my name was Sparky? I live in Florida, grew up in Missouri (return regularly), and drive through Georgia on a regular basis. I've never had money taken from me by the police. Nor have I been detained for a search.

I do however have to chase crack heads off of my investment properties though, and never work on one anymore without being armed.
_____________________________________________________________

Did you have large sums of cash on you? Stuff a few thousand in your pocket, get pulled over for speeding and see how that works out. Over half the time...you will have to petition the courts to have your money returned. I know 3 insurance adjusters that have had to do this within the last 5 years in MS alone.


42 posted on 04/05/2006 1:54:43 PM PDT by MadeInAmerica (- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Bank Robber means Wealth Redistribution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Poincare
...before the human to human gunfight started.

Change "gunfight" to "gunfire" since it was rather one-sided.

43 posted on 04/05/2006 1:55:28 PM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: JTN
Certainly not the way they're written, no. Some of them may be downright egregious behavior... some might have considerable artistic license taken on the facts, and some might be just plain made up for all any of us know.

A dozen individual unrelated accusations gathered in one editorial is clearly designed to inflame people as if cops all over this country are going out of their way to kill puppies, apparently just for the fun of it.

I support holding law enforcement to a high standard because we pay them to do a tough job and we want them to be good at that job. I do NOT support cop bashing even when it's trying to tug at my dog-lovin' heartstrings.
45 posted on 04/05/2006 1:58:47 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Hobbit Hole knives for soldiers! www.freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

animals don't have a voice. We are their voice and the only one they have to protect them. If we won't, then who will?

I love my dogs more than most people. They'll always be true, they'll never lie, they are always there when you are down, they'll never yell at you and no matter how much you yell at them, not matter what you do to them, they will unconditionally love you. and when they die, a piece of you dies with them.

I'm a firm believer that you can judge the character of a person by the way he treats his dog. I don't have much respect for people who have no respect for an innocent life that appears to be less worthy than their own. Because it wanders around on 4 feet doesn't make it any less God's creature.


46 posted on 04/05/2006 1:59:09 PM PDT by immigration lady (Defeat is momentary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
I wonder if JBT raids are more common in "gun free" states like CA and the northeast corridor?

I don't know for sure, but I'd bet they are, for exactly the reasons you mentioned.

47 posted on 04/05/2006 2:03:49 PM PDT by jmc813 (I Thessalonians 5:9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MadeInAmerica

Why are they emptying their pockets without a search warrant? Likely something here I'd completely agree with you about.

My point is that I don't connect the dots on bad cops = legalize drugs, which is what seemed to be getting advocated. Completely separate issues. If drugs are legalized, the bad cop issue still isn't addressed.


48 posted on 04/05/2006 2:06:03 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: immigration lady

Your #46 is one of the best FR posts I've read in a long time. What you wrote was what I was trying to convey in post 17.


49 posted on 04/05/2006 2:06:13 PM PDT by jmc813 (I Thessalonians 5:9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MadeInAmerica

Gotta go coach soccer. I'll check in later.


50 posted on 04/05/2006 2:06:47 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: immigration lady

Damn well said.


51 posted on 04/05/2006 2:09:40 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
My point is that I don't connect the dots on bad cops = legalize drugs, which is what seemed to be getting advocated. Completely separate issues. If drugs are legalized, the bad cop issue still isn't addressed.

You put a different bend on it, but I think you, like me, see this whole article as a red herring.

52 posted on 04/05/2006 2:11:41 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Hobbit Hole knives for soldiers! www.freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Why are they emptying their pockets without a search warrant? Likely something here I'd completely agree with you about.

My point is that I don't connect the dots on bad cops = legalize drugs, which is what seemed to be getting advocated. Completely separate issues. If drugs are legalized, the bad cop issue still isn't addressed.
___________________________________________________________

Oh, I don't condone legalizing drugs in any way shape or form. My problem is the way they are allowed to sieze property and the citized has to "prove" it is gotten by legal means later in court. Large sums of cash carried by people...to authorities that means only drug money.

As for illegal search, when pulled over in certain areas, all they need is probable cause and they can rip your vehicle apart if they choose. Large sums of cash to them is probable cause. They just ask about drugs, weapons, large sums of cash, etc.


53 posted on 04/05/2006 2:14:11 PM PDT by MadeInAmerica (- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Bank Robber means Wealth Redistribution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: immigration lady

I agree with you. My dog Max is my best friend. More than once he has placed himself between me and danger. This single German Sheppard has ten times the courage of the SWAT team cowering behind the building at Columbine.


54 posted on 04/05/2006 2:20:52 PM PDT by TheDane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
That tyrant in Phoenix should be run out of office. Unfortunately, the gullible citizenry there equate torture and inhumane treatment for misdemeanants, petty criminals, non-paying dads, traffic ticket debtors and alimony debtors with competent law enforcement.

And, even worse, a large percentage of the inmates of any county jail is persons who have not been convicted of any crime at all, felony or misdemeanor. They have been arrested and held because they couldn't made bail. A significant number are never charged with a crime or are found not guilt or otherwise have their case dismissed. So, they walk out without a criminal record having suffered from the inhumane conduct of the Sheriff and his band of thugs. The serious felons and really bad guys go to state prison, so he's portraying a tough guy, wild west sheriff with inmates who've committed minor offenses or none at all.

It's not the baloney sandwiches or even the pink jail uniform. This cretin's pride in feeding the inmates on 40 cents a day and confining them to pup tents in the 120 degree heat during the day and 50 degree desert night is simply obscene.

The old rubric that crime has gone down in Maracopa County is an illogical deflection from the real question of humane treatment. His posturing is a disgrace and his seeming willingness to burn homes, shoot pets and children exemplifies his reign of criminality and terror masquerading as law enforcement.

55 posted on 04/05/2006 2:22:01 PM PDT by middie (ath.Tha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Gotta go coach soccer. I'll check in later.
_________________________________________________________

That in of itself makes you a good man in my book. I know the owrk that goes into it. What age? I've coached now for 10 years and this is my LAST year for my girls. Gatta love 17 year old girls worried more about how they look than how they play. ROFL I just have 2 rules...no bleeding and no crying.


56 posted on 04/05/2006 2:23:17 PM PDT by MadeInAmerica (- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Bank Robber means Wealth Redistribution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NordP

I don't like to see puppies hurt, either. But my anger is correctly directed. JBTs treat people like 'animals', and personification of animals can also devalue humans. Therefore, my anger goes in both directions (though not in equal portions).


57 posted on 04/05/2006 2:28:15 PM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Shootist
During the Clinton administration we called them "jack-booted thugs". Guess that ain't PC no more.

They're our jack-booted thugs now.

58 posted on 04/05/2006 2:38:00 PM PDT by Denver Ditdat (Melting solder since 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Have you ever seen certain parts of Phoenix?

Gang-ridden and crime-ridden. The criminals are usually armed better than the police on duty.

There are certainly times and places an APC could come in handy. I have no problem with them having one.


59 posted on 04/05/2006 2:38:34 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: immigration lady
animals don't have a voice.

Animals have teeth, claws and a survival instinct. The only ones that truly need us are the ones that were bred to need us. God provides for the sparrow.

I don't have much respect for people who have no respect for an innocent life that appears to be less worthy than their own.

Nor do I. I have no desire for the animals I eat to unnecessarily suffer - but eat them, I will. I have no desire to see a puppy shot - but I'm more concerned about the pain it causes his owner to have him shot.

I also don't have much respect for those people who elevate animals above humans. I know I don't do enough charity on my own - but I cringe every time I see a celebrity pimp for a PETA cruelty cause, when I know that there are PEOPLE that need the help MORE.

Because it wanders around on 4 feet doesn't make it any less God's creature.

Maybe not. But the Bible spends an awful lot of time telling us how to treat our fellow humans. Most of its mention of animals is to discuss preparation for sacrifice, or finding lost sheep. Again, God provides for the sparrow - but he commands us to love each other; he really didn't say an awful lot about our love for the sparrow, other than to be good stewards of the planet. Therefore, I think that the injustices done to PEOPLE take priority over the injustices done to ANIMALS. YDMV (Your Dogma May Vary.)
60 posted on 04/05/2006 2:43:31 PM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson