Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 04/29/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Enough noise from this damn thing.



Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter weighs in on Darwinism
uncommondescent.com ^ | William Dembski

Posted on 04/27/2006 8:01:57 AM PDT by Tribune7

I’m happy to report that I was in constant correspondence with Ann regarding her chapters on Darwinism — indeed, I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters. :-)

(Excerpt) Read more at uncommondescent.com ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; bewarefrevolutionist; coulter; crevolist; darwinism; evolution; godless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 961-962 next last
To: Right Wing Professor

hear=here


321 posted on 04/27/2006 2:57:56 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

bump


322 posted on 04/27/2006 2:58:24 PM PDT by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I push back to you to prove God didn't create life using my creationist rules.

Nobody can prove that.

And that is why creationism isn't science. Do you get it?

323 posted on 04/27/2006 2:58:33 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Consider yourself ignored.

Oh boo hooo, like i care.

324 posted on 04/27/2006 2:58:39 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
All because I ask questions like, if man evolved from apes why are the still apes...

If you ask questions like that you should expect some ridicule. If you descended from Europeans (or whatever) why are there still Europeans?

325 posted on 04/27/2006 3:00:02 PM PDT by js1138 (somewhere, some time ago, something happened, but whatever it was, wasn't evolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: js1138

so humans had sex with apes?


326 posted on 04/27/2006 3:00:59 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: js1138

true definition of monkey love.


327 posted on 04/27/2006 3:01:40 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Hey mlc9852, do you agree with Casey Luskin's classification of apes vs. humans that you linked to in #222?


328 posted on 04/27/2006 3:04:14 PM PDT by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: "The Great Influenza" by Barry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Explain how you derrived this conclusion. It sounds to me like you have a morbid obsession with sex.

The short answer is that evolution does not involve mating between species. No offspring is ever of a different species.


329 posted on 04/27/2006 3:08:42 PM PDT by js1138 (somewhere, some time ago, something happened, but whatever it was, wasn't evolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

Level Of Discourse Datapoint Placemarker
330 posted on 04/27/2006 3:08:58 PM PDT by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Junior
"Who has denied the existence of God?"

Previously...Several evo posters on this website.

And, it was an outright denial of existence...not a debate relative to taking Genesis literally.

Some of these posters have even stated that they do not believe that we have God-given rights (as in endowed by our Creator...), which according to Jim Robinson's recent post is a conservative must.

Sometimes God's existence isn't just denied...it is mocked (FSM references, and so forth).

331 posted on 04/27/2006 3:11:11 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: ml1954
Level Of Discourse Datapoint Placemarker

Given where we started (Ann Coulter/Bill Dembski's 'thoughts' on evolution, I don't think you can argue the thread's gone downhill.

332 posted on 04/27/2006 3:11:12 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Explain how you derrived this conclusion. It sounds to me like you have a morbid obsession with sex.

Just joking around and it was aimed at this comment you made

If you ask questions like that you should expect some ridicule. If you descended from Europeans (or whatever) why are there still Europeans?

333 posted on 04/27/2006 3:12:51 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

Tony Snow also.


334 posted on 04/27/2006 3:13:24 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

ROFLMAO. You nailed it.


335 posted on 04/27/2006 3:13:56 PM PDT by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

But when you start at the bottom, every direction should be up. We seem to have found a wormhole.


336 posted on 04/27/2006 3:14:05 PM PDT by js1138 (somewhere, some time ago, something happened, but whatever it was, wasn't evolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
"Do you have to be a Christian to be a conservative?"

Ann Coulter certainly thinks so. I was watching her on CSPAN one night speak to this, that being a conservative is based on Christianity. I completely disagree with her on this ( and many other things ). Does a person who wants lower taxes and less government get excluded from conservative club just because they have a secular outlook? Comments like this might help her sell books to vast number of "social conservatives" but it alienates anyone else.

337 posted on 04/27/2006 3:16:34 PM PDT by stacytec (Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Skull spam placemarker

So Mamzelle, in post 300 where do you draw the obvious, insurmountable line between "just an old ape" vs. "just an old human"?

338 posted on 04/27/2006 3:16:45 PM PDT by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: "The Great Influenza" by Barry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
Unfortunately, you're right.
339 posted on 04/27/2006 3:23:47 PM PDT by DaveLoneRanger ("You're not going crazy! You're going sane in a crazy world!" - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Angry are we not?

Yoda, is that you?

I never said "evo is junk science".

I never said you did.

Having looked all those people you said were, what was it, stupid or ignorant, can not remember

I am in awe of your ability to focus your razor-sharp mind on a discussion and not lose track of it over the course of an hour or so.

but I read all their bios and they are all in the scientific field.

ROFL!! Look again. Even if they were, however, so what? You have failed to address what I actually said about them.

Yet, they disagree with you, huh ... goes back to my original statement, anyone who disagrees with you is stupid, ignorant, an idiot or whatever word you use on any given post.

You're really stuck on this false accusation, aren't you? Look, I explained why exactly I point out that certain anti-evolutionists are ignorant of the field they attempt to critique. Hint: It had something to do with the fact that they didn't know much about it, and keep making the most elementary mistakes about it, the kind that a first-year student wouldn't even have made.

Just how poor is your reading comprehension?

You see I am very confident in what I believe, you can agree with me or not, no skin off my nose, the chose is yours.

Yes, your arrogance in your unsupported and unsupportable (and false) presumptions about me are quite clear, and "the chose [sic]" I make is to conclude that you're unable to have your prejudices swayed by any of those pesky "facts" or anything I might actually write. You came into this thread with your mind already made up, your mental fictions about "evolutionists" already set in stone, and the fact that you keep saying things in direct contradiction to what I've actually written shows that you're going to run with your wild guesses about me while not bothering to pay any attention to what I really say, or who I really am.

You on the other hand are trying way to hard to convince me you are right,

Ah, yes, the old "if you're confident in your conclusions and attempt to explain them, you're 'trying way to hard'" ploy, used as a laughable and obviously fallacious attempt to discredit something by pointing out something ludicrously irrelevant.

usually done by people who are not that sure in what they are espousing.

Yes, right, being really confident of something proves my lack of confidence in it! ROFL!!!

Come back when you know how to have a rational discussion, and are willing to deal with what I actually write instead of what you wish to pretend I'd written.

340 posted on 04/27/2006 3:26:29 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 961-962 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson