| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/29/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Enough noise from this damn thing. |
Posted on 04/27/2006 8:01:57 AM PDT by Tribune7
Is this scientific evidence, or...
Go snuggle up with your pal David Irving.
Ahhh, the straws some people grasp at. Its one of the reasons I enjoy these threads.
"a OSS propaganda document from 23 years later."
"Go snuggle up with your pal David Irving."
You are a real pig. I am reporting you for abuse, you asshole.
God help your students, if you really are a professor. (Which I hope is another one of your fantasies.)
And tell me, what in Hitler's speech of 12 April 1922 was different in any respect from what Martin Luther preached in 'The Jews and their Lies'? Lose the distractions, and answer the questions.
"Is this scientific evidence, or..."
Yes and no. It does however explain my viewpoint alittle better regarding my statement of "open your eyes and look around".
"You are a real pig. I am reporting you for abuse, you asshole."
Certainly qualifies for one of the most ironic posts of the year.
Yes, but how many "prentenders" are there? More than two?
Oh, but I was just being 'sarcastic'. Couldn't you tell?
I thought it was more than two.
"I thought it was more than two."
A whole Adam's Family.
Episode 1: The God Delusion | Episode 2: The Virus of Faith
How is it, asks [arch-darwinist] Richard Dawkins, that despite science having exposed old religious myths, militant faith is back on the march? The mechanism for perpetuating beliefs that Dawkins describes as leading to murderous intolerance, is by imposing religion on children who are too inexperienced to judge it for themselves
We wouldn't categorise children according to their parents' political stance, says Dawkins, since they are too young to make up their minds about such matters. But we segregate them in sectarian religious schools, where they are taught superstitions drawn from ancient scriptures of dubious origin, which promote a 'contradictory and poisonous system of morals'.
From generation to generation
[Arch-darwinist]Dawkins compares this to a virus, which infects the young and is passed down the generations. Visiting an ultra-orthodox Jewish school, he describes the British-born headteacher Rabbi Gluck's Yiddish accent as testament to the isolation of his community. Gluck says that it's important for members of minorities to have the space to express their own beliefs and traditions. He describes science as one tradition, and Judaism as another. His students are taught about evolution and if only a minority end up believing in it, he says, this is not out of ignorance.
The number of faith schools is increasing. More than half the Government's proposed City Academies will be run by religious organisations and there's a growing number of private evangelical Christian schools. ACE – Accelerated Christian Education – has developed a curriculum which includes a mention of God or Jesus on every page of its science text book. The head of a school which uses this material argues that if there were no lawgiver, there would be no reason to see rape and murder as wrong.
Hellfire and damnation
Transmitting such a 'warped reality' to young people, says [arch-darwinist] Dawkins, amounts to indoctrination. Children are uniquely vulnerable and if they fail to question and shake off such superstition, they remain in a state of perpetual infancy. He talks to a woman brought up in a strict Christian sect who describes the terror of eternal damnation, which dominated her childhood, as a form of abuse.
Hellhouse movies are a new growth industry in the USA today. Graphically filmed, they demonise abortion and homosexuality with the explicit aim of scaring the viewers. Pastor Keenan Roberts explains that the aim is 'to leave an indelible impression on their lives that sin destroys … and Jesus saves'. The result, says [arch-darwinist] Dawkins, is a mindset which can justify the murder of a doctor who carries out abortions on the grounds that he is destroying a being created in God's image!
Innate morality
Physicist and Nobel prizewinner [arch-darwinist] Stephen Weinberg describes religion as an insult to human dignity. 'Without it,' he says, 'you'd have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, it takes religion.' [Arch-darwinist] Dawkins agrees. It is more moral, he says, to do good for its own sake than out of fear. Morality, he says, is older than religion, and kindness and generosity are innate in human beings, as they are in other social animals. The irony is that science recognises the majesty and complexity of the universe while religions lead to easy, closed answers.
Is there no more than just this life? asks [arch-darwinist] Richard Dawkins. How much more do you want? We are lucky to be here, he says, and we should make the most of our time on this world.
(My point in posting this left wing atheist mind manure isn't to start a debate on the points raised, but to call attention to the fact that darwinists constantly make faith claims masquerading as science. But darwinist faith claims are blessed, subsidized, and enforced by the state.)
Yes and no. It does however explain my viewpoint alittle better regarding my statement of "open your eyes and look around".
Appreciate your response. I see where you are coming from.
However, adapting the trappings of science (or any other field) does not constitute doing that science.
It still appears you are coming from a religious viewpoint, not a scientific one.
L O L, L O L, busy busy little fingers......
"religious viewpoint, not a scientific one."
I suppose it seems that way. I understand the workings of science as do many of the scientists who have come to the conclusion that it all just "didn't happen", the happening had help.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.