Skip to comments.
Dinosaur Shocker (YEC say dinosaur soft tissue couldn’t possibly survive millions of years)
Smithsonian Magazine ^
| May 1, 2006
| Helen Fields
Posted on 05/01/2006 8:29:14 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 1,701 next last
To: AndrewC
I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable. Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed.
This is a contradiction.
801
posted on
05/02/2006 4:28:03 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
To: ml1954
This is a contradiction.You have the floor.
802
posted on
05/02/2006 4:40:26 PM PDT
by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: DaveLoneRanger
"If she thinks creationists are rude and unkind..."
Then assertions such as "they are chronic mysoginists" would prove her right?
803
posted on
05/02/2006 4:43:28 PM PDT
by
Sofa King
(A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
To: AndrewC
You have the floor.
No need.
804
posted on
05/02/2006 4:49:06 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
To: ml1954
No need.As you wish. I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.
805
posted on
05/02/2006 4:51:50 PM PDT
by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: AndrewC
As you wish. I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.
You said something else as well.
806
posted on
05/02/2006 4:56:20 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
To: ml1954
You said something else as well.Yes, and it was still a contention not a proof. BTW, you contradicted your reply.
807
posted on
05/02/2006 4:58:27 PM PDT
by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: AndrewC
AndrewC: I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable. Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed.
Me: This is a contradiction.
808
posted on
05/02/2006 5:04:11 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
To: ml1954
Me: This is a contradiction.Yes you made that statement. And what you were replying to was a contention.
809
posted on
05/02/2006 5:05:39 PM PDT
by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: AndrewC
Yes you made that statement. And what you were replying to was a contention.
You have the floor.
810
posted on
05/02/2006 5:08:02 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
To: LukeL
Yeah, it does kind of read like the beginning of a Literotica story...
811
posted on
05/02/2006 5:08:55 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
("Patriotism is the highest form of dissent." - Mark Steyn)
To: ml1954
You have the floor. Statement one - I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable. (a contention that includes the word contend)
Statement two - Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed. (another contention which does not include the word contend).
812
posted on
05/02/2006 5:13:12 PM PDT
by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: ahayes
AIG gave the impression that Dr. Schweitzer was essentially scooping raw marrow out of a fossil femur with a spoon.I don't know if it was AIG, but I distinctly remember hearing the words "hamburger meat" being thrown about...
813
posted on
05/02/2006 5:13:19 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
("Patriotism is the highest form of dissent." - Mark Steyn)
To: AndrewC
"Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed."
If there exists evidence that is contrary to what the ToE says then it can't be unfalsifiable, by definition.
814
posted on
05/02/2006 5:15:35 PM PDT
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
To: mlc9852
I don't use the term "heathen". I prefer atheist.You might want to rethink that...
Signed, a Gnostic Buddhist
815
posted on
05/02/2006 5:17:26 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
("Patriotism is the highest form of dissent." - Mark Steyn)
To: 2nsdammit
"May I have ten thousand marbles, please?" placemark
816
posted on
05/02/2006 5:17:37 PM PDT
by
dread78645
(Evolution. A dying theory since 1859.)
To: CarolinaGuitarman
If there exists evidence that is contrary to what the ToE says then it can't be unfalsifiable, by definition.Yeah right /sarc
817
posted on
05/02/2006 5:19:56 PM PDT
by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: AndrewC
Statement one - I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable. (a contention that includes the word contend)
Statement two - Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed. (another contention which does not include the word contend).
Your second statement did not include the word contend. Agreed.
818
posted on
05/02/2006 5:22:14 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
To: AndrewC
"Yeah right /sarc"
Sorry if you failed basic logic, but my statement is correct. You can't say that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND that evidence exists that goes against it.
819
posted on
05/02/2006 5:27:57 PM PDT
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
To: BrandtMichaels
Possibly you've heard that Hebrew is/was the most highly-evolved of all known languages?What makes one language more evolved than another?
820
posted on
05/02/2006 5:28:54 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
("Patriotism is the highest form of dissent." - Mark Steyn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 1,701 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson