Skip to comments.
Lies our drug warriors told us
Reno News and Review ^
| August 24th, 2006
| Dennis Myers
Posted on 08/25/2006 6:26:19 AM PDT by cryptical
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-309 next last
I've seen most of these lies repeated by drug warriors here on FR, just thought I'd toss this out for a Friday morning.
1
posted on
08/25/2006 6:26:20 AM PDT
by
cryptical
To: cryptical
plasters it into the pipe much as a Christian would fill a hole with putty Hmmm - I didn't get the memo on that - is there a "Christian way" to fill a hole with putty?
2
posted on
08/25/2006 6:36:05 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: cryptical
Some people say Pot makes you forgetful. I say that, umh, I, umh...
3
posted on
08/25/2006 6:36:44 AM PDT
by
outofsalt
("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
To: cryptical
I'm going to go get some popcorn. Back in a minute.
4
posted on
08/25/2006 6:39:23 AM PDT
by
dljordan
To: Izzy Dunne
Hmmm - I didn't get the memo on that - is there a "Christian way" to fill a hole with putty?Well, Roman Catholics use rhythm.
5
posted on
08/25/2006 6:40:50 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
To: cryptical
"The reporter, Mark Twain, whose Victorian sensibilities made him uncomfortable when faced with the scenes in Chinatown, nevertheless was one reporter who did not use his coverage of opium use to demonize the Chinese. Others were less principled. They set the pattern of much of the news coverage of drug use that followed in the next century and a half."
Sheriff Behan from the movie, "Tombstone" "I'm also Chairman of the non-partisan anti-Chinese league."
6
posted on
08/25/2006 6:42:17 AM PDT
by
RayStacy
To: cryptical
The controversy arose at a time when both Democrats and Republicans in Congress and President Reagan had sliced apart the "safety net" that had long existed for poor families. By 1985, prenatal care and nutrition were less accessible. Federal deregulation of the insurance industry had cut low-income families loose from health insurance. Federally funded medical care had been slashed
If I had been willing to give the author the benefit of the doubt on this article, the above paragraph was enough to erase it. Typical Leftist twaddle.
To: cryptical
This poo-pooing of efforts to explain the devastation of drug abuse is popular among most conspiracy theorists. Dismissing efforts to dissuade children from experimenting with addictive drugs is a fool's errand.
Certainly truth telling is critical to believability. For those trapped in a lifetime of addiction, however, no amount of reason will suffice. Nor will hand holding therapies.
Overcoming the attraction of trance inducing drugs is best pursued by debunking myths about such drugs as a means to deep spiritual experience, instant serenity, ecstatic pleasure and their ilk. Those are the lies that kill.
8
posted on
08/25/2006 6:45:50 AM PDT
by
Louis Foxwell
(Here come I, gravitas in tow.)
To: cryptical
Plenty of lies on both sides of the issue.
9
posted on
08/25/2006 6:45:55 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: cryptical
I'm a bit confused here...and really trying not to hijack the thread...prolly just rhetorical question, but maybe one day the SCOTUS might face the same question...if it hasn't already (not certain)...
Why is it that the same folks who cry about "the right to choose what one does with one's own body"...it's a privacy issue when it comes to killing the unborn donchaknow...are the first to say that the argument doesn't apply to drug usage. Hypocracy.
I don't use drugs, but just the same...inquiring minds wanna know...
10
posted on
08/25/2006 6:46:04 AM PDT
by
woollyone
(Preacher; "If there was more love in the world, there'd probably be a lot less dyin'")
To: PaxMacian; WindMinstrel; philman_36; headsonpikes; cryptical; vikzilla; Quick1; gdani; ...
11
posted on
08/25/2006 6:46:47 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Lazamataz
Well, Roman Catholics use rhythm. Brilliant.
To: woollyone
In the pursuit of hypocracy, that's probably not the best windmill to tilt against. I suspect a larger portion of the abortionists are pro recreational drug use.
13
posted on
08/25/2006 6:55:57 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Peace In Our TimeĀ®)
To: cryptical
Show me the successful societies that tolerate legal and widespread recreational drug use.
14
posted on
08/25/2006 6:56:00 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: cryptical
I think the refusal to get serious about defending the border does more to debunk the federal WOsD than anything else. We talk about the illegales but we rarely talk about the cheaper, more potent coke and pot that gets ferried across.
15
posted on
08/25/2006 6:57:28 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Peace In Our TimeĀ®)
To: woollyone
Why is it that the same folks who cry about "the right to choose what one does with one's own body"...it's a privacy issue when it comes to killing the unborn donchaknow...are the first to say that the argument doesn't apply to drug usage. Hypocracy. Because the Drug War makes money for those on both sides of the political aisle. The Drug War is about control; a lust for control is one thing that Democrats and Republicans have in common.
To: cryptical
HHoooooooWeeeee Talk about opening a can of worms.....
17
posted on
08/25/2006 6:58:23 AM PDT
by
SouthernBoyupNorth
("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
To: Moonman62
Show me the successful societies that tolerate legal and widespread recreational drug use. The United States of America, from 1620 to 1937.
To: Izzy Dunne
19
posted on
08/25/2006 7:00:20 AM PDT
by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
To: Izzy Dunne
I found that observation to be a little flaky myself. Why use Christian? Why not Muslims, Hindus, or Atheists? Totally distracted me.
20
posted on
08/25/2006 7:00:31 AM PDT
by
mother22wife21
( NO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EVIL FOOLS)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-309 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson