Dead Bones = dead bones, nothing else no proof that any thing else other then another one of the same kind came from it.
This is both a complete misrepresentation of fossil evidence for evolution and completely irrelevant to my questions. You do not demonstrated that the theory of evolution is folse by demonstrating that you are wholly ignorant of the evidence that is said to support it.
I was not responding to the fact that evolution does not exist in the real world
Your claim is demonstratably false.
and I know those who worship naturalist ways will never admit that God exists.
You are now willfully lying about those who accept the theory of evolution. This does not, in any way, support your claims.
But it is another grasp at a fictional process using evidence that proves nothing.
Given that you have made no demonstration that you actually understand the information in the article, or that you have even read the article, your claim is difficult to accept as reliable.
posted on 10/29/2006 10:40:37 AM PST
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
I said, "Dead Bones = dead bones, nothing else no proof that any thing else other then another one of the same kind came from it."
Please show me evidence contrary to what I said.
Because It is true 100%, you can not prove from dead bones ANY offspring came from it. If you can show me please.
Please show me my ignorance of the theory of evolution by my demonstration of evidence. You will not.
In a court of law I would win you would lose.
Your evidence is based upon what if, could have, might be, all circumstantial at best.
You do not have a leg to stand on, but Hey faith in your religion of evolution will evolve a leg someday.
posted on 10/29/2006 11:36:05 AM PST
(If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson