You are incorrect
You are free to dispute the validity of the evidence presented for the theory of evolution, but claiming that no evidence exists at all demonstrates only that you have not actually researched the subject at all.
posted on 10/29/2006 5:10:31 PM PST
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
Talkorigin is often quite deceitful & known for leaving out important info when trying to make their case- Try Trueorigin.com for rebuttles to their biased info. Free to dispute? Oh, their assertions have been prattyy thoroughly disputed with scientific evidences- the problem with talkorigins is that they present half-truths in an effort to malign I.D-ers instead of being objective scientists & simply presenting what they beleive to be evidences open to discussion- as such talkorigin often makes fools of themselves as the site I mentioned trueorigin.com takes science and disputes their site quite thoroughly- We've looked into the claims of evolutionsits Dimensio- extensively. Scientific proof for evolution has a huge barrier that they MUST jump if they are to prove evolution & that barrier is the 'kind begets kind' problem- in order for kind to beget non-kind, gene transference MUST take place- otherwise- no new information can be 'created' through mutations- mutations simply take information already present and alter it along the same line- it turns it into freak info in otherwords- in order for a nipple to turn into an eye for instance (Yes, I know- rediculous example- but bare with me- just using a 'for instance' annalogy), NEW information from an outside source MUST be introduced- No amount of manipulation of information already present in the animal will change that nipple into an eye- it can't- it goes against the law of kind begets kind- Biologically speaking- it's impossible- We've tried and tried- but have never once mutated a gene capable of this- the evidence is so overwhelming against mutations creating new species that science has fairly recently had to be herded in another direction- gene transference. Even gene transference has it's problems however- which is another argument- I'll be happy to explain more- if you like- but htis could get quite long- suffice it to say - gene transeference is similiar to the 'genetic drift' that talkorigin attempts to define as 'evidence for evolution' but it falls far too short due to every creatures built in protection mechanisms that prevent perversion of genes beyond acceptable deviances.
Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...
posted on 10/30/2006 9:53:18 AM PST
There was no evidence of evolution where is a changing animal, where is a changing human, where is a new creature forming in the ocean.
There in no evidence in that article.
posted on 10/30/2006 6:16:18 PM PST
(If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson