Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary Cheney's pregnancy affects us all
Townhall ^ | 12/07/2006 | Janice Shaw Crouse

Posted on 12/07/2006 7:16:54 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 461-472 next last
To: linda_22003
so if they didn't want people to "invoke" such stupidity later, they shouldn't have done it.

Falwell's comments belong to him, Robertson's words belong to him.

My words belong to me.

Post 92 belongs to me as well, not Falwell, or Robertson; I am not yoked to them. So what say you?

121 posted on 12/07/2006 9:27:39 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

....and let me add that you should thank your lucky stars that you live in a society where your views aren't an automatic death sentence. You don't get it, do you?


122 posted on 12/07/2006 9:29:46 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse

Well, what's the point of #92 in relation to this thread? Are you saying our enemies perceive us as weak because Mary Cheney is pregnant?


123 posted on 12/07/2006 9:30:22 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
Are you saying our enemies perceive us as weak because Mary Cheney is pregnant?

It's small piece of the overall puzzle. Please remember that drjimmy made the statement that I responded to.

Disingenuity will get you nowhere fast, that I promise.

124 posted on 12/07/2006 9:32:51 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse

I do indeed, and my family has prized that about this country for the nearly three hundred years we have been here. My views are not permitted to me by you; they're outside your control. And I'm by no means alone.

I have been here for some time, interested in conservative values in government containment and fiscal responsibility. I have never disguised the fact that most social conservative issues are not a reason to have Big Government. Sorry if that bothers you, and sorry if it bothers you that several people agree with me.


125 posted on 12/07/2006 9:33:24 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
I do indeed, and my family has prized that about this country for the nearly three hundred years we have been here.

Rome had its patrician families. Not impressed.

My views are not permitted to me by you; they're outside your control. And I'm by no means alone.

That was precisely the point. You can live in your present state of denial, but America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and I have a feeling that is why your family has flourished for 300 years. I doubt Mohammed would be as kind.

I have been here for some time, interested in conservative values in government containment and fiscal responsibility.

Right.....but you conveniently leave out liberal mores as part of the package.

Sorry if that bothers you, and sorry if it bothers you that several people agree with me.

...oddly enough, the only thing I hear is crickets at the moment. I hope your friends haven't abandoned you.

126 posted on 12/07/2006 9:40:20 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Pietro
I'm not recommending any gov. action at all, but I have a right to my opinion and in my opinion anyone that purposely brings a child into the world w/o a father is selfish.

I completely agree... but I can't figure out the seeming obsession of many Freepers w/ a woman who does not hold public office and who (so far) is not making a big public deal of the matter.

127 posted on 12/07/2006 9:40:22 AM PST by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse

Let me ask you something, then. Since you're so unhappy about Ms. Cheney's decision, what do you propose should be done about it?


128 posted on 12/07/2006 9:44:58 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
Didn't really answer my question but I'll give you points for cleverness.

If you didn' think I answered your question, here it is: Yes, I very much doubt that they are laughing at us over Mary Cheney having a baby. Now a question for you. Since it seems you believe they are laughing at us, and therefore perceive us as vulnerable, what do you propose be done about it?
129 posted on 12/07/2006 9:46:30 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

She is extremely selfish.

1: She will be bearing a child out of wedlock.

2: She will be raising a child in an unwholesome environment, with another woman. There will be no father figure.

3: She was likely responsible for destroying embryos.

Not to mention the anguish she is causing for her mother and father...


130 posted on 12/07/2006 9:49:37 AM PST by angelicap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The only way this baby affects me is if they hit me up for a baby shower gift.


131 posted on 12/07/2006 9:50:09 AM PST by linn37 (Love your Phlebotomist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

Nope, you're transparent, linda! Cheerleading for the homosexual agenda and any kind of moral relativity [sic] as usual, and then, as usual, waffling about it!

Carry on!


132 posted on 12/07/2006 9:50:56 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Don't say (sic), you spelled it right, Jeri! :)


133 posted on 12/07/2006 9:52:07 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
I have never disguised the fact that most social conservative issues are not a reason to have Big Government.

Who has said anything about using gov't, Big or otherwise in this case?

Stop beating up strawmen.

My views are not permitted to me by you; they're outside your control.

We'd tell you the same thing. Don't we have the same right to expres our views, mainly that this is lamentable?

134 posted on 12/07/2006 9:53:09 AM PST by SoothingDave (Are you on the list?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Certainly you can. :)


135 posted on 12/07/2006 9:54:08 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

moral relativism is extremely lamentable.


136 posted on 12/07/2006 9:54:56 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz

Yes, the fact that homosexuals are also adopting and being foster parents and often given preference over normal married couples means squat. Nothing. Even though there is overwhelming evidence that children raised by homosexuals have many more problems (drugs, misbehavior, school problems, "gender identity" problems, promiscuity problems) than other kids.

Tne normalization of homosexuality, what to speak of its promotion, affects everyone who lives in such a culture. If you don't see that you are either singularly ill-informed and don't read up on FR, or think it's a good thing.


137 posted on 12/07/2006 9:55:30 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
Let me ask you something, then. Since you're so unhappy about Ms. Cheney's decision, what do you propose should be done about it?

It doesn't include stoning; is that satisfactory?

138 posted on 12/07/2006 9:56:10 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

You REALLY have your panties in a knot over (the fact that people consider the normalization of homosexuality not a good thing) this, don't you?


139 posted on 12/07/2006 9:57:16 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

She is extremely selfish.

1: She will be bearing a child out of wedlock.

2: She will be raising a child in an unwholesome environment, with another woman. There will be no father figure.

3: She was likely responsible for destroying embryos.

Not to mention the anguish she is causing for her mother and father...


140 posted on 12/07/2006 9:57:38 AM PST by angelicap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 461-472 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson