Skip to comments.
DU Tactics at FreeRepublic
FreeRepublic
| 4/3/07
| Reaganesque
Posted on 04/03/2007 7:24:18 PM PDT by Reaganesque
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 841-852 next last
To: auto power
....there you go.....again.....Time after time, a few Rudy boosters (the ones leading the personal attacks against Rudy critics) deny posts they have made. When confronted with the past posts, they parse them. That is documented.
It's getting as predictable as Hillary saying "uuuhhh" ever other sentence in her responses to questions.
461
posted on
04/04/2007 10:21:28 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
To: Fierce Allegiance
Wideawakes is an AntiFReep site and is populated with several Clown Posse members as well. All members there should be block-banned from FR.IMO, that's preposterous. You should be ashamed of yourself. You should know better.
463
posted on
04/04/2007 10:22:00 AM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: My2Cents
Please don't give up.
The signal:noise ratio is already high enough. This place can't afford to lose any more reasonable posters.
464
posted on
04/04/2007 10:23:04 AM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Future Former Freeper)
To: wagglebee
What does that have to do with my post to you? Talk about a change in subject.
But if you want to discuss minority status, did it bother you in the least that such a majority of freepers supported Alan Keyes in 2000 when it was clear he wasn’t out of double digit status?
Haven’t you noticed how most of the nastiest posters who pretend to be perfect conservatives don’t ever support candidates who have actually announced or could actually win? There’s something a little off there.
465
posted on
04/04/2007 10:23:07 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons' pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Peach; All
Oh, thats an intelligent reply. But when its all youve got...
Sweet Peach, you abandoned the thread in question when confronted with the fact that you had NOT been accused of trashing Duncan Hunter's wife, but had only received a 'CC' from Apocalyptus. And then you had to face the fact that your pal Veronica was the one who first started sneering about Mrs Hunter for NO REASON.
You and your fellow Rudyphiles seem to have a problem with facts, especially when they don't cooperate with you.
Now toddle on along and whip out some of those talking points, you're going to be way behind your quota if you don't step it up.
466
posted on
04/04/2007 10:23:18 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: veronica
If you feel you must resort to that kind of attack thats your business.
So, you're saying that 'bot' isn't quite so offensive then eh?
467
posted on
04/04/2007 10:24:18 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: Corin Stormhands
The others don't really have a prayer of gaining the nomination. According to the Democrat controlled MSM, they are not frontrunners, right?
We make whomever we want into front runners, by deciding to back them, by getting their names out, by sending links to friends and asking them to pass them on, check them out, etc.
This is the new media. It has brought down old media icons, but that is just strutting around the edge of the nest flapping a fledgeling's wings.
Time to really fly.
We can ill afford to let the Dems tell us who our candidate will be. Hunter looks best to me, but who ever is well enough backed by the grassroots could attract money--which comes to people who look promising.
Let's pick a candidate on the issues, and then push for the exposure.
Granted, some media viability has to be inherent (or taught) the candidate, but someone who resonates with conservatives who can work the whole conservative field.
People who vote party line Republican will get on the bandwagon, and anyone dissatisfied with the latest liberal antics, loss of soverignty, open borders, and who wants to be as secure as we can against terrorism will jump aboard too.
If the significant 'anyone but Hillary' crowd means that, their votes count as well, and there is a chance of bringing in some of the third party right wing on the basis of conservative principles.
Can it be done? Why not?
Who else would you want to get the nomination and why?
468
posted on
04/04/2007 10:24:33 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: Fierce Allegiance
I doubt there are CP members at Wideawakes. It's more like Lucianne.com, if it's the forum I think it is. Another Conservative forum, and no threat to FR whatsoever.
To: Wormwood
The signal:noise ratio is already high enough. I believe a high SNR is a good thing, signifying a lot of signal (numerator) and little noise (denominator).
470
posted on
04/04/2007 10:25:13 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(FRED!)
To: auto power
Ahhh - you join in the slime campaign. So typical of Rudy boosters - you claim to take the high road and then make a post like that.
471
posted on
04/04/2007 10:25:29 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: LimberJim
” This is the difference:”
Feh.
All the other GOP candidates say the same thing, but no others are as liberal as Rudy.
Rudy is more like Hillary than like them.
472
posted on
04/04/2007 10:25:49 AM PDT
by
GovernmentIsTheProblem
(Capitalism is the economic expression of individual liberty. Pass it on.)
To: mkjessup
So, you're saying that 'bot' isn't quite so offensive then eh?Not so much offensive as immature.
To: Petronski
Yeah, I just caught that.
*shakes head* Pathetic.
474
posted on
04/04/2007 10:26:59 AM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Future Former Freeper)
To: My2Cents
Because of my public support here for Rudy Giuliani, I'm surprised I haven't been banned yet. So, I'll save the Mods the work of monitoring my posts for some "banning offense," and simply ask that they delete my account at FreeRepublic. I don't want to be associated with this site any longer.
Oh wah wah wah, don't be such a drama queen, if you don't like it here, as I've said to any poster who suddenly thinks FR isn't for them:
GTF *OUT*!
And spare us the tearful theatrics.
475
posted on
04/04/2007 10:27:19 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: dirtboy
To: My2Cents
That about sums it up. My phrase for those described by you above is the "Rigid Right." They are a catalyst for the far Left (whether they recognize it or not) though they fancy themselves the cure.
LBT
.....
477
posted on
04/04/2007 10:28:34 AM PDT
by
LiberalBassTurds
(The Painful Truth: All the World Terrorists are Muslims! -- Abdulrahman Al-Rashed)
To: My2Cents
I’m sorry to see you go, My2Cents. I agree with what you’ve written and stated many times that, thankfully, not one Republican I know, including the most socially conservative among them, talks the way these few maladjusted freepers talk.
However, I refuse to let some maladjusted people who don’t like the Republican I like run me off the forum. They can continue to whine to the owner and the ultimate decision is up to him.
478
posted on
04/04/2007 10:28:52 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons' pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: veronica
So, you're saying that 'bot' isn't quite so offensive then eh?
Not so much offensive as immature.
And gawd knows you've never been immature, eh? ;)
479
posted on
04/04/2007 10:29:09 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: Petronski
Shhhhh.....please don’t confuse him with facts,,,,”HE WAS ON A ROLL”!!!...lol
480
posted on
04/04/2007 10:29:58 AM PDT
by
stockstrader
("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 841-852 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson