Skip to comments.Question for Palinistas. What will you say when...
Posted on 01/08/2010 2:07:44 PM PST by Bob J
...Palin endorses John McCain?
1) She's just "playing the game". Standing on principle and voting the RINO's out is fine as long as it doesn't interfere with Sarah becoming prez.
2) If Sarah says supporting RINO's is okay, that's good enough for me. The Messiah is infallible and what do I know?.
3) She's not being inconsistent, she's making a tactical retreat, but hey that's politics.
4) A smart move by the smartest woman in the world.
5) She didn't want to but the dims threatened to file an ethics complaint if she didn't.
6) She's not quiting, she's reloading.
7) What endorsement? That wasn't an endorsement she was repaying a political favor. Everyone does it.
8) That was part of her master plan to make dims and the MSM fear her even more...if that's even possible.
9) C'mon, McCain wasn't THAT bad...
10) Who cares? Look at those LEGS!
Can you procide the link to that statement as it doesn’t look “right”.
My point was McCain has been pro life his entire life and has always received good marks from pro life grups. My objection was that if McCain didn’t pick the “correct” running mate pro lifers would desert his campaign ensuring a pro abortion President.
McCain would have made the right choices conerning this issue, why throw it all away based on the choice of running mate?
To me that is cutting off your nose to spite your face. Disagree if you will but my reasoning was solid.
Sarah Palin will endorse McCain against that “lightweight”
Hayworth and she will help McCain win.
JD Hayworth is an incompetent boob.
To 197 - I don’t doubt you actually feel like that. You’re probably the most prominent freak on this site.
You are on a conservative, prolife, proGod forum and you have a problem understanding why conservatives would not want McCain to pick someone as liberal, or even more liberal than he is for veep, and you were pushing that view before the choice had even been made, already insulting freepers and FR in general for having the principles of this site?
Your “reasoning” is what makes you more like a DU troll than a freeper.
Your remarks are in post #8 at this link.
No oneis without blemish. I like Sarah very much. Honestly, her statement months ago that she believes that Chairman Mao Obama loves America is far more upsetting to me. I WILL support whoever wins the nomination against Obama, and so should every other American. Bob
I call that becoming a liar, crook and accomplished bullshit artist.
I really don't want Sarah to become that.
Don't play that card Bob. Someone who's been a freeper since 2001 has earned his stripes.
No matter what she does, Palin bashers will find something negative to say about it. If she endorses McCain, it’s payback; if she endorses Hayworth, it’s ingratitude; if she declines to endorse either, it’s cowardice.
If she wants to show leadership, she will do what’s best for Arizona and for the rest of us. If she fails to do so, it wouldn’t convince me she could never make a right decision in the future, particularly based on her Alaska record, and even more particularly, when put up against some of the other candidates we saw last time around.
I second that.
Sounds like a Commie term to me.
I’ll deal with stupid political moves when they come. My attitude towards Palin is cautious optimism. But I’ll never go to Mitt’s camp.
It's on my resume.
1999 - 2010: Most Prominent Freak on website known as Free Republic.
Duties included salivating over hot pictures, making passes at every single woman, and posting the phrase "I'd hit it".
Since I don’t expect Palin to be in office again until 2013, it might be a bit early for you to worry about holding her pretty little feet to the fire.
You should probably change your screen name to Quagmire.
Giggity, giggity, giggity...
Beats me, all I get is the video.
Your family looks ill. How did you get them to pose like that?
Nice breaking news material...Hey, this thread **is** now in the Breaking News sidebar!
And, the thread's TITLE has now changed, too!
Question for Palinistas. What will you say when... Bob J's Sad Opus [update #187]He must have got SOMEBODY'S attention...
No kidding! I started laughing the minute I saw this latest thread.
Doesn't Bob owe you an answer to to a question youasked him...oh say....three "Sarah" threads ago??? Hmmmmmm??? What say you Bob, you still a MittBot?
OH! LMAO! Are you freaking serious?!
...whewwwwwwww!!... you are OUT there...
It's a tough job, but somebody's got to do it.
I am laughing at these threads.
I guess this is the only way some people can
get stimulated in Wyoming.
I would actually think less of Sarah, if she were to be asked, did NOT support McCain.
That type of disloyalty is not Sarah’s style at all.
Dude, your post #187......
....You need rest.
Hey, darkwing, what say you?
This is worse than something A+Bert would post when he was drunk.
Hysterical attacks followed by calls for you to be zotted.
You know, these fights are so sad. I know this site "officially" disapproves of some Republicans, yet I can't really get myself into bashing any of them. I'll just state my preferences, and let it go at that. Its a shame we couldn't all refuse to personally insult another Freeper for his preferences. This place would sure be a lot nicer.
For the most part your contributions to this site are negative, whiney and bi!tchy.
No idea is a good idea unless it was thought up by you, in your not so humble opinion.
You seek attention at any cost like tila tequila, good or bad and, I curse myself for giving you 15 seconds of mine.
I always figured the A stood for alcohol.
Alcohol + Bert = A+Bert posts.
You know Bob J....you actually legitimize Sarah because of your Obsession with her, you make more fans of her since you act crazy and don’t give any coherent responds but DU talking points and Huffington Post revelings
Can you elaborate?
Was BobJ banned? I didn't see a message saying so when I clicked on his name.
I don't recall BobJ titling this as an Opus. Did you do this on your own?
Please explain why this is now in Breaking News, too.
Hey robertpaulsen. This is a very target-rich arena for you to step in. If I were you, I’d start going anti-Sarah; in that way you can get all the online fighting you crave. ;)
They may be talking it over amongst themselves.
Keep in mind that Bob J wrecked the Free Republic network by disregarding all the help of all the interested FReepers who worked hard to develop such an organization. Bob j’s “not invented here philosophy” destroyed the organization and drove away many many good Freepers.
He is at it again. He doesn’t like her, therefore she and all who adore her must be destroyed. Don’t patronize him by arguing. he is not worth the effort
Coming from the likes of you, that’s quite the badge of honor.
So Bob J posts this crap non-stop and we are all just supposed to “walk on by”?
This is a discussion forum. Somebody posts and others discuss, not just agree to be nice.
You should know this by now.
Is it not an opus?
Is it not breaking news that an opus of epic fail is up for all to see?
What’s taking so long?
- - - - - -
No clue. Mod conference?
post 187 is waay beyond appropriate!
No, you wouldn't. She doesn't support legalizing dope,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.