Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama and his attorney are acting like frightened 5 year olds.
Orly Taitz web site | January 25, 2012 | Orly Taitz

Posted on 01/25/2012 1:40:28 PM PST by jcsjcm

Obama and his attorney are acting like frightened 5 year olds. In his letter he ignores the other 2 attorneys, but is pretty much saying ‘I am afraid of Orly”.

See the letter attached. What Obama is asking now, is totally insane. He is asking the Secretary of State of GA to take the trial away from the judge on the eve of the trial. He is mostly crying on the shoulder of the Secretary of State of GA and saying that Orly is bad, because she issued all of those subpoenas. So after the judge told Obama, that the subpoena, that I issued was perfectly valid and he had to appear in court tomorrow and bring with him all of the documents, that I demanded, Obama decided to go behind the back of the judge and send the same complaint about me to the Secretary of State and he is asking the Secretary of State to take the trial away from the judge.

Does this look like a behavior of an innocent person? An innocent person would have come to court and showed all the valid documents with the embossed seals, which are verifiable. Instead he is acting like a 5 year old brat, saying “I am afraid of Orly, I want the Secretary of State of GA to act like my mommy and protect me from Orly.” Some leader of a free world…


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: certifigate; challenge; georgia; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-114 next last
To: humblegunner
Go forth and vote against Obama. Sin no more with fantasies of having him removed.

Whether he is removed or not is mostly irrelevant at this point. What is relevant is that he be exposed as never having been a legitimate president in the first place. He needs to be mentioned in the History books with an Asterisk next to his name. (* This man was not a legitimate President, and all his actions were illegal.) Also, it is very important that everyone who refused to question his legitimacy be demonstrated to be fools and idiots.

This effort is now for the History books and object lessons to those who would weaken the restrictions on Presidential eligibility.

51 posted on 01/25/2012 3:00:49 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Are you such a coward you can’t even say it?

Protecting your man - your only option is to name calling. Orly's fighting a good fight for America and you call her a clown and asking me if I'm a coward when YOU KEEP saying VOTE HIM out and then question me 'WHO' he is. Lay off the barry kool aid for a while.

52 posted on 01/25/2012 3:02:31 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Orly Taitz is a nut.
Nothing she does (or misspells or misfiles) will make
a poot’s worth of difference toward anything. If she
is eligible, she may be able to cast a vote though.

Just like everyone else.

And if you aspire to cast me as an Obama supporter, I welcome you to give it your best shot.


53 posted on 01/25/2012 3:03:02 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Crazy ole coot

Better not make humblegunner mad, he will tell Jim that you were mean to him.


54 posted on 01/25/2012 3:03:41 PM PST by coon2000 (Give me Liberty or give me death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Also, it is very important that everyone who refused to question his legitimacy be demonstrated to be fools and idiots.

Couldn't agree more.

55 posted on 01/25/2012 3:04:45 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Yeah, that birther stuff is really going to work. Just look at the stellar record so far.

You mean look at the utter turds in our legal system who use legal tricks to run from the truth. The problem with this issue is not the birthers, it is the utter corruption of our legal system. We need to spank some judges and teach them better respect for the interest and will of the people.

56 posted on 01/25/2012 3:07:20 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Orly's fighting a good fight for America

She's an incompetent loon.

Lay off the barry kool aid for a while.

AHA! You admit that you think I support Obama because I feel Taitz is a clown.

If Bozo showed up with a seltzer bottle when your house was on fire,
would you consider yourself pro-fire because you questioned Bozo's competence?

57 posted on 01/25/2012 3:08:30 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
I IGNORE LOSERS.
58 posted on 01/25/2012 3:09:39 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: coon2000
Better not make humblegunner mad, he will tell Jim that you were mean to him.

You needn't worry about that.

Rather worry that I'll tell Justin Bieber that you released "those pix".

He's got lawyers, I hear.

59 posted on 01/25/2012 3:12:26 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

“I IGNORE LOSERS.”

Praise the Lord.

If that’s true, explain this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2837796/posts?page=58#58

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2837796/posts?page=52#52

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2837796/posts?page=50#50

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2837796/posts?page=48#48

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2837796/posts?page=33#33

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2837796/posts?page=20#20

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2837796/posts?page=18#18

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2837796/posts?page=6#6

Eight posts on one thread.. to someone you ignore?

You lying puke.


60 posted on 01/25/2012 3:19:03 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

“Sorry, I can’t believe that some incompetent skank like Taitz can take down a sitting president.”

The Lord uses the foolish to confound the wise. A third-rate burglary brought down a sitting President of the U.S.


61 posted on 01/25/2012 3:26:27 PM PST by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

THANKS! Just a bit from your link and something I learned in 5th grade. It’s amazing it’s even a question and in the courts!....

Barack Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally ineligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama was born to a FOREIGN NATIONAL FATHER who was NEVER a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. For no other U.S. President in the history of the nation since the founding generation (who were exempt from the natural born Citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution via a grandfather clause in Article II Section 1) was that the case, i.e., having a foreign national father who was never a U.S. Citizen or even an immigrant to this country. Obama being seated as the putative president is an outrageous violation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, the presidential eligibility clause. Obama was not born with sole allegiance to the USA. Sole allegiance and unity of Citizenship at birth was the goal and purpose for putting the natural born Citizen clause into Article II Section 1 of the Constitution as to who could serve as president once the founding generation has passed away. Obama (II) was born a British Subject via his foreign national father Obama (Sr.) who was a British Subject. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to constitutional standards since he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship. The founders and framers did not want anyone with foreign allegiance to ever get command of our military, i.e., be the president. Obama is constitutionally not eligible to be president and commander in chief of our military.


62 posted on 01/25/2012 3:27:49 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; presently no screen name

Please refrain from personal insults! We realize there is a difference of opinion, so just ignore each other rather than accuse and insult!

Just asking as a favor! Thanks....


63 posted on 01/25/2012 3:31:04 PM PST by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
She's an incompetent loon.

She's certainly had her problems, but this is one time where the judge upheld her subpoena and now the attornery is trying to go over the head of the judge. The criticism doesn't fit this time. It only makes you look uninformed on this issue.

64 posted on 01/25/2012 3:34:20 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

So is your Mom.


65 posted on 01/25/2012 3:34:20 PM PST by Manic_Episode (Politics is fake. I think it's owned by Vince Mcmahon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
“If I think that a house fire can't be put out with an arguement that the matches were stolen, does that make me in favor of stolen matches? Or house fires?”

No just in favor of putting a non-NBC communistic black nationalist in charge of 5000 nuclear weapons for *another* 4 years by attempting to use alynskyite methods to silence anyone who dares to try to raise the alarm that the candidate has shown only computer files at the end of Internet url’s as ID (instead of a physical paper legal document with a raised seal in a Georgia court when challenged legally) and used a SSN from a state that that he never lived in.

What could possibly go wrong? sarc.

66 posted on 01/25/2012 3:38:36 PM PST by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode
So is your Mom.

Kiss my butt. Prove it, cite any posts she made supporting your assertion.

On any site.

Or admit you are just spouting bullshit.

Yeah, you help the birthers by making up total crap.

Help 'em some more, fireball.

67 posted on 01/25/2012 3:40:22 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Are the proceedings tomorrow only based on the filings of Orly Taitz, or are other people involved?


68 posted on 01/25/2012 3:40:38 PM PST by freedomlover (Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm
"So after the judge told Obama, that the subpoena, that I issued was perfectly valid and he had to appear in court tomorrow and bring with him all of the documents, that I demanded, Obama decided to go behind the back of the judge and send the same complaint about me to the Secretary of State and he is asking the Secretary of State to take the trial away from the judge."

So, where, did you, learn, to punctuate, sentences?
Or do you, get paid, by the, comma?

69 posted on 01/25/2012 3:43:51 PM PST by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

From Black’s 7th:

improvident

[...]

2. Of or relating to a judgment arrived at by using misleading information or a mistaken assumption.


70 posted on 01/25/2012 3:46:25 PM PST by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Looks like tomorrow morning’s hearing (if not postponed because of the tactics of the “we’re above the law” Obama attorneys) will be streaming live. I’m planning on following it if my schedule allows. See the linked material for more info.

http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2012/120125/frontpage-Obama.html


71 posted on 01/25/2012 4:00:28 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Tomorrow could very well be a historic day.

If Obama gets thrown off the ballot it will make history and the damn could bust.

If that happens you and another certain FReeper will go down as the biggest losers in the history of Freerepublic, as the wrongest FReepers ever.

If that happens I will start the thread and the size of the crow you will eat will be as large as your mouths.

By all means keep on shooting your big mouth off, it may be your last hurrah and will make the crow that much tastier.

We'll find out tomorrow....

72 posted on 01/25/2012 4:02:13 PM PST by Manic_Episode (Politics is fake. I think it's owned by Vince Mcmahon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Taitz is such a loon, all her motions in every court have been denied.
I can’t believe anyone here still backs her efforts.


73 posted on 01/25/2012 4:02:41 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode
If that happens you and another certain FReeper will go down as the biggest losers in the history of Freerepublic, as the wrongest FReepers ever.

Good luck with that.

74 posted on 01/25/2012 4:04:20 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

OK, you win. Please don’t tell!


75 posted on 01/25/2012 4:15:07 PM PST by coon2000 (Give me Liberty or give me death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
I can’t believe anyone here still backs her efforts.

You fail to account for heavy eye make-up.

And the accent. Eye make-up combined with an accent trumps all manner of reason.

It even trumps documented lunacy.

Try to pay attention, please.

76 posted on 01/25/2012 4:20:46 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Crazy ole coot
The B/C may only verify that his father was not a citizen which makes obama ineligible.

Right. Where he was born makes little difference. The important, provable part is: that it can be shown that he is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution, since his father was a British subject at the time of his birth.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President...
-Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States

77 posted on 01/25/2012 4:37:59 PM PST by Max in Utah (A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

“Taitz is such a loon, all her motions in every court have been denied. I can’t believe anyone here still backs her efforts.”

Really? The hearing(s) will be live-streamed tomorrow morning early. Maybe folks should try to follow this to develop an informed opinion not nurtured solely by the selective information available in the mainstream media. The following link provides the information needed to get the live-streaming.

http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2012/120125/frontpage-Obama.html


78 posted on 01/25/2012 4:51:43 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Hey Hummygobbler, this document is a hoax.

My president has balls and he will go to court and show them his original BC, from the binder, and his college records.

My president has respect for the American people, Kenyan constitution, and judicial system.

This hoax of a letter can't be from Obama and his lawyer. Only a scuzzbag would have his lawyer write a letter like that, maligning the ALJ.

79 posted on 01/25/2012 4:54:11 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

Yeah,... OK.
Your president is obviously awesome.

What’s his name, and what country is he president of?

(Take another hit, breathe out, relax)


80 posted on 01/25/2012 4:59:19 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

I will not diss Orly, since I believe her heart is in the right place. But, she isn’t doina any of us any favors by being in the limelight on this subject. Her case is not the case I am watching. I really don’t believe she understands that this is not about the certificate.

The whole issue is about the Natural born citizen clause. And if you have read any letter that has come out of any office including the DNC or his lawyers, they always talk about him being an American Citizen or a citizen or doubting his citizenship. They never divulge the constitutional issue of being a natural born citizen as per Article 2. They refuse to make any statement as to natural born. That is because they know that this is the issue that most of us are arguing on. Not the Birth certificate. I could care less about that.

yada yada yada - yeah he’s an American citizen, but so is Rubio yet he could never run for President.


81 posted on 01/25/2012 5:01:49 PM PST by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

I think her batting average is still better than Larry Klayman’s. ;)


82 posted on 01/25/2012 5:03:21 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Just some FRiendly advice. Take your comments that have no factual backing to the echo chamber at fogbow, you will gain FRiends....


83 posted on 01/25/2012 5:10:13 PM PST by GregNH (I am so ready to join a brigade of pick up trucks......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

OK, but is used as an adjective by the inclusion of ly. So am I to assume that this attorney is suggesting that the SoS issued the order for a hearing by mistake? So he will “withdraw” because this attorney says he is mistaken? I think not.


84 posted on 01/25/2012 5:15:52 PM PST by GregNH (I am so ready to join a brigade of pick up trucks......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
Just some FRiendly advice.

Yeah? What's that?

Take your comments that have no factual backing to the echo chamber at fogbow

Never heard of it.
Wait, let's see.. AHH! You're a 2009 n00b!

Maybe you should STFU and go back wherever you came from.

Have a blessed day and don't be a tard so much.

85 posted on 01/25/2012 5:16:52 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

I am still surprised by how many people think this can be fixed by voting. I highly doubt there will be any kind of fair election, even if there was, do you honestly think anything will be that turned around? The reset button needs to be hit, and return to the original constitution, before any additions, and start over. This ship is too far beneath the waves to be re-floated and sailed.


86 posted on 01/25/2012 5:17:25 PM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

You’re the low level scumbag!


87 posted on 01/25/2012 5:22:47 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

“There is no right against self-incrimination in an Administrative Law Hearing.”

Wow! What’s the authority for that? The right against self-incrimination is constitutional. It’s hard to imagine a regulatory body being granted extra-constitutional powers.


88 posted on 01/25/2012 5:24:46 PM PST by JewishRighter (Anybody but Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
You’re the low level scumbag!


89 posted on 01/25/2012 5:28:33 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

I’m not getting involved in the “debate” pro-birther, anti-birther, etc. I just want to point out that you shouldn’t really harbor any hopes of a decisive result of any kind tomorrow. At best, the Court will briefly convene, review the procedural status, including Jablonski’s letter, offer Taitz and any other counsel for the parties who appears to weigh in on the situation and then give some guidance on a procedure going forward. Even if he outright rejects Jablonski’s suggestions and his refusal to appear, he would, at best issue some kind of order for another date to hear why he shouldn’t hold Obama and possibly Jablonski in contempt for knowingly disregarding the subpoena.

Look, to one and all, there are valid arguments for and against pursuing these issues. I pray that it doesn’t have to be so contentious among the good patriots on this website. Leaving aside the political wisdom of pursuing the question of Obama’s eligibility to run for or to be President, isn’t it a burning question that should bother us no end? In legal circles, we use the phrase “colorable claim “ to describe a claim that has legs, has some apparent basis to be subjected to scrutiny and adjudication. It may seem, in some respects, unusual, even strange, but there is enough there there to clearly understand that it is not just concocted out of thin air.

So it is with Obama’s eligibility. Although the birth certificate issue has been awfully muddied, the question of NBC status seems like a very clear-cut issue. There is substantial precedent for the principle that NBC requires two American citizen parents and we know that Obama does not meet this definition. Obama’s spectacularly hypocritical lack of transparency regarding so many of his personal records only adds fuel to the fire of doubt about his status.

Please don’t flame me for this. I’m just saying that politics aside, isn’t the question a real question?


90 posted on 01/25/2012 5:44:26 PM PST by JewishRighter (Anybody but Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Hummergobbler could start his own thread.


91 posted on 01/25/2012 6:00:48 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Like this?:
snip-”New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the ’08 election. My prior report documented the scrubbing of just two cases. But last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all US Supreme Court cases which cite “Minor v. Happersett” as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present.”

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/

Seems Harrison J. Bounel (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, Barak Hussein Obama, Steve Dunham) may be just a skosh nervous.


92 posted on 01/25/2012 6:03:23 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

You got spunk tonight Hummy.


93 posted on 01/25/2012 6:04:14 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Suz in AZ

Yes thats the rub. I hope they can drag it out long enough that Obama never gets on the ballot.

I think the Sec of State just torpedoed the SS Obama on their cry baby letter.


94 posted on 01/25/2012 6:06:12 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
Hummergobbler could start his own thread.

Could he now?

On what topic specifically?

Come on, speak up with some specifics.

Don't just hang behind and talk about folks behind their backs.

Puss-dripping cowards do that.. don't be one of those.

Or is it too late?

95 posted on 01/25/2012 6:15:01 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

On the topic of drinking alone.

Alone does one drink top shelf or rotgut.


96 posted on 01/25/2012 6:18:03 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
If you ever start a "Have a few drinks and start Orly ass-spanking on birther threads" ping list...put me on it.
97 posted on 01/25/2012 6:21:53 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
"Sorry, I can’t believe that some incompetent skank like Taitz can take down a sitting president."

Believe it, obot. It's just a matter of time before you get your well deserved ZOT.

I will make sure I post that jpg of Nelson doing his HaHa.

98 posted on 01/25/2012 6:26:03 PM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Whatever.
Anybody who thinks Taitz is a loon is an “obot”?

Really?

So.. she’s going to take down Obama any day now, right?
Gets all of her legal stuff done right too? No errors?

Look, Jack..

Folks can think Taitz is a loon without supporting Obama.

Just because she has an anti-Obama cause does not automatically make her correct or smart or sane.

She is none of the above.

Maybe you should find a COMPETENT lawyer to run the case.
Then nobody would make fun.


99 posted on 01/25/2012 6:34:59 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: jcsjcm
http://​obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspo​t.com/2012/01/​obamas-attorney-jablonski-slapp​ed-down.html snip if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.
100 posted on 01/25/2012 7:23:23 PM PST by Crazy ole coot (Mr. obama will be tried, but as a British Citizen or American Citizen? Who knows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson