[cpdiii]

Suze Orman is a very talented business woman and knows what she is talking about in relationship to finance and investing. What she does in bed is her damn business and I do not care. I do not care if she is “married” in the eyes of the law. I would care greatly if she was married in the eyes of the church. Marriage has been a function of the church for over 2000 years. It is only of recent that it is also function of civilian law. As long as the civilian law does not interfere with the doctrine of the church, I do not care!

I do find it odd that Suze Orman is advocating a vote for an individual that is the opposite of her in relationship to wealth creation. She wants to create wealth and Obama wants to take the wealth.

[oh8eleven]

Suze Orman is a very talented business woman ...
Is she a successful business woman or does she just give advice?
And her advice is little more than common sense: pay off debt; max annual payments to 401(k); live within means.

[wbill]

Suze Orman is advocating a vote for an individual that is the opposite of her in relationship to wealth creation

No real surprise, IMHO.

If more people were successful, then she'd be out of a job. Tough times make people look for "easy" answers, which sells her books.

[Baynative]

Suze Orman is strong on eliminating credit card use and funding personal saving accounts.

Well, DUH! But, in fact Orman is often wrong on other advice according to financial advisers and market watchers. I think it is because as with many liberals, she is a liberal first and that takes precedent. It influences the way she thinks on every subject and she can't separate her politics and professions.