Skip to comments.Ryan is a good man, but does not redeem the abortionist/homosexualist statist Romney
Posted on 08/11/2012 4:42:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Except for his unfortunate go along to get along support of TARP, bailouts, stimulus spending and the increased credit limit, etc, Ryan is a pretty good choice. Probably the best choice of the RINOS that were on Romney's short list. I support Ryan for the vice presidency. Wish he were at the top of the ticket, though.
But I still cannot and will not support the grand father of ObamaCare. Romney still loves and brags about his bastard brainchild, RomneyCare, even today when he knows what an anti-liberty socialist POS it is.
And the fact that he advocated that abortion should be safe and legal in America for over three decades of his adult lifetime and even advocated that Roe v Wade should be supported and sustained as settled law precludes any consideration whatsoever by this pro-life Christian for Myth Romney for the presidency.
And the fact that he boasted that he would be better for "gay rights" than Ted Kennedy, and proved it just increases my resistance.
That, and his penchant for gun control, his continuing support for global warming, gays in the scouts, gays in the military, and his record of appointing liberal judges makes it all but impossible for me to support him.
Lastly, we're having a bit of changeover on our moderator staff. At least two moderators resigned this afternoon after I flatly refused to rein in a so-called anti-Mormon "bigot" on FR. Well, if being in opposition to false prophets and false prophecy makes a Christian believer a bigot, then I guess I'm a bigot. I've posted before that I flat do not believe that the Book of Mormon is the true word of God. Nor do I believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God. The Christian bible warns us to be weary of false prophets and that I am. Romney being the presumptive Republican nominee does not change that fact.
You needn't do any such thing, if it isn't the normal way for you, hon.
The heraldic logo, directly underneath my family's ancestral coat-of-arms! ;)
Well; it was GOD's fault!!
"Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?
The man said, The woman you put here with me she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it.
Colorcountry, in discussions with another Freeper, pinged me and asked me to point to any post that they had made that I deemed an attack or offensive. I did so, sincerely, but also directly. Since that post, colorcountry has contacted me offline and sincerely apologized, which I equally sincerely accepted, and we have resolved the difference and misunderstanding...for the which I have respect and apprciation for colorcoountry.
Given your tone and accusative spirit, sadly, I cannot say the same for you. I have neve mentioned my status as FOTY on these threads...only you and others have done that. I did not seek it, campaign for it, and was not even aware that such a vote or contest even existed until the day I was pinged to a thread here on FR and was informed I had been voted it.
Back then, and now, I credit all the people who worked with me and helped me at Klamath Falls and its Water Crisis in 2001 the summer before the 911 attacks. Many of them right here on FR.
So, you raising that topic is simply a red herring and a straw man. Thanks...but no thanks.
No victimhood, no pity...as I stated on my response to colorcountry. If you are tired of my posts...you have a simple solution. Just do not read them. That is wholly within your power to do.
If you think I will stop witnessing of and for my Savior and what He has done for me through those experiences when I feel moved to do so...then you are sadly mistaken. I shall not.
God bless you in your own life's walk.
As some one who has experienced the call of death (stage 4 caner, really no need for going into detail) and was divinely healed, I found the testimony lovingly presented.
The real question is why has this testimony angered you so.
I see you’ve replied to 3952.
Have you somehow missed the question put to you in 3901?
And for the record, the difference is 51
The first recorded instance of passing the buck?
Man oh man
You sure do talk about yourself a lot and really whiny to boot
I wonder if Churchhill had any thoughts on MORMONism...
One more thing I forgot and I’m sorry. Mr. Resettozero said you would know how to translate something in to Jewish for him that he wants to post to someone on world wide web Free Republic dot com sight when he returns. I wrote it in Spanish first because my short hand in English has been so slow since the mudslide and then I switched it back to English and here it is. “Go do 16 ounces of salt.” I hope I got it right because his talking manner is not like the English I learned from the missionaries. He said he was born a native southern American country boy but he didn’t say which South American country. I’m sorry to bother you and I think that’s all he asked me to do before he left suddenly with that shapely young wife of his. Flourine
Yes, i know you have “2” or “1.” Funny how history keeps repeating itself.
That is why it is important to read the true Word of G-d as given to Moses... the original, often imitated, but still around a lot longer than anything else... The Torah!
So again... Since you still haven’t answered... Do your beliefs match up to the Noahide laws?
Fixed it for you.
Let's not forget President-in-exile Sarah Palin's trip to Israel.
Again, her love of Israel radiates off her.
You hyper purists ....
I guarantee you you will find some moral flaw in the positions and or actions of every single politician according to your standards that would mean we shouldnt vote for anyone.
***That’s a fantastic argument against hyper purists. The only problem is, there are very few hyper purists on FR, if any. It is a straw argument, setting up someone into a position that they don’t hold so that you can argue against it.
You objectively pro-Obama hyperpurists will lead to the death of this once great country.
***Hyperbole. You pro-librul prostitutes will lead to the death of this once great country, starting with killing off conservatism, which is obviously your goal. Otherwise, why are you here rather than converting 0bots to mittbots? Because you intend to sow discord among conservatives on this conservative (NOT REPUBLICAN) website. Your first claim to being a conservative is false. You aint a conservative when you do such things. Obama thanks you for your efforts to sow discord among conservatives on this conservative website.
My personal problem with what you, and the Religion Moderator, are doing is singling out Mormonism for special abuse.
For instance, Mormons are not allowed to have "ecumenical" and "caucus" protections on the Religion Forum. If there are individual Mormons who misbehave they individually should be sanctioned. If others repeat the bad actions, them too. The categorical ban is wrong.
There are other religions that have been called cults such as Christian Science, Jehovah's Witnesses,Worldwide Church of God,Unity School of Christianity or Scientology that do not have to take the constant assault you allow on MormonISM.
Let me tell you the distinction between attacking Mormons or MormonISM is specious. Mormons will take this personally, and should. Only people with a grudge would crusade like this. Hate has a smell anyone can recognize. That you allow it is all the worse.
We went over this many times on Abuse Report pages over a long time. Mormons are generally peaceful and socially Conservative who don't deserve this abuse. I won't be a part of it.
Quote: “IMHO, your latest post is wholly undeserving of a reply”
religion spawning from another, and people getting angry over new books written as an appendage or replacement for the original texts...
***In the mormon case, it’s a religion based upon lies against christianity. In the christian case, would you say it’s based upon lies against judaism? If so, where is the lie?
Go smite yourself.
The biggest threat to you is currently occupying the White House.
For instance, Mormons are not allowed to have “ecumenical” and “caucus” protections on the Religion Forum.
***because they abused it, per the religion moderator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.