Skip to comments.Should we trust George W. Bush?
Posted on 08/29/2002 1:00:30 PM PDT by feelin_poorly
Shortly after 9-11, TV talk-show host Sean Hannity said, "Thank God, we have an honest man in the White House!"
And when you think about it, a great deal of what you might believe about the so-called War on Terrorism is based on statements from George W. Bush. You have only his word, or that of someone in his administration:
Since America is endangered by the "you're either with me or against me" tactics of the Bush administration, it becomes vital to know whether we can trust the man in charge of our government.
So does George Bush's record inspire confidence in his honesty?
Unfortunately, this is the same man who has referred to trillions of dollars in budget surpluses even though the federal government hasn't had a budget surplus since 1956. (The appearance of any "surpluses" was created by taking excess receipts from Social Security and applying them to the general budget, even as the politicians swore they were protecting Social Security.)
Mr. Bush even has the chutzpah to refer with a straight face (well not exactly a straight face, he loves to smirk) to corporate executives "cooking the books." He neglects to mention that many of the corporate bookkeeping methods the politicians are so incensed about today were motivated by rules imposed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
And George Bush is the same man who in 2000 said he believed in "limited government." Most people assumed he meant a government limited by the Constitution. In fact, he took an oath in which he swore to uphold the Constitution.
But he's violated virtually every one of the first 10 Amendments especially the Ninth and 10th Amendments, which are meant to impose precise limits on his power.
So his belief in "limited government" apparently means government limited to what he wants to do.
George Bush is the same man who in one breath tries to ingratiate himself with you by saying, "It's your money, not the politicians' money" but in the next breath, he says he's entitled to one third of "your money."
George Bush is the same man who said he has learned more about political philosophy from Jesus of Nazareth than from anyone else. But he's proven by his actions that he doesn't really believe such things as "Blessed are the peacemakers." And "the meek" who Jesus said would inherit the earth are in Mr. Bush's eyes really just "collateral damage" in his plans to tell the world how it must live.
Is honesty important?
In these and in so many other ways, George Bush has proven that he's not an honest man and that we shouldn't trust him with the safety of America.
In fact, Thomas Jefferson understood that we shouldn't put our trust in any politician. He said we should bind them down from mischief "by the chains of the Constitution." And a truly honest man wouldn't even ask you to trust him.
Contrary to what you might have thought, this isn't an article about George Bush. It's an article about you. Are you going to demean yourself by putting your faith in a man who has done so much to demonstrate the folly of such faith?
Are you going to let politicians stampede you into throwing away the Bill of Rights, based on "evidence" you never see, reassured by politicians who have proven that the truth is secondary to their own ambitions?
Don't you have enough respect for your own mind to make your own decisions, refuse to accept conclusions without evidence, and be something better than a cheerleader for a politician or a political party?
Jefferson was right about the chains of the Constitution. Unfortunately, it no longer applies.
First of all, no one is dying to invade Iraq.
Second, I get the impression that Browne thinks the only way he can get some people to turn an ear towards his policy grievances is by questioning Bush's trustworthiness (and implicitly, his patriotism.)
Once again, Harry Browne proves why he's more politically irrelevant than Cynthia McKinney.
Junior has violated nearly the entire Bill of Rights consistently, since he's been in office. Only one I can think of, offhand, that he HASN'T violated is the article about quartering troops in our homes.
But that's OK. After all, he's a born again Christian. And a Republican.
100 Trillion more times than ANY liberal's level of honesty. That enough for you?
I guess as long as it's "our man" doing the end-run against this Nation's founding principles, it's okay.
This is exactly how I feel. I do trust George W. Bush! I'm not ashamed of it and I don't care what you think about it.
I think at this very moment Saddam is trying to think of a way to kill more of us.
Would you rather live here with Bush or in Iraq with Saddam?
.0000000000000003 X 100,000,000,000,000 = .000003
Yep, you're absolutely correct.
What is it with these guys? It says something about a politician when he can't get his point across without snide little remarks like this.
Give 'em time my friend. They're working diligently to overturn posse comitatus even as we speak. Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war!! I just hope that we're not the ones that end up being dog meat!!
Yeah, well, the "also rans" never quite let go of the dream, it seems to me. He's not the only one.
I have no idea what his spiritual life (or lack thereof) consists of. Perhaps someone else can provide that information.
Neither, given current conditions. One is becoming a monarchy while the other is a dictatorship. I'd MUCH prefer the Country that we had just 40 short years ago before the federal government starting sticking its nose into every facet of our private lives. The lesser of two evils is still evil, after all.
Don't pee on my head and tell me it's raining.
With venom like this he ought to start a snakebite treatment facility.
You mean the one that's plastered all over FreeRepublic? Yes, I got it. Over and over and over again.
Not surprising. feelin_poorly is just following in the footsteps of many of thinkers who have dared to question the Bush administration here. It's a sad commentary that a civil discussion can't be carried on with a person who doesn't tow the party line.
If I were you, I'd get out now. There ae no walls or people with guns keeping you here.
Take Alec and Cher with you when you go.
Yes, I know. I realized this man was completely insane when he made public his position on military action after 9/11. The only reason I didn't know it before that was that I paid no attention to him.
Oh REALLY? Then kindly explain to me why so many posters (many of which had been posting here a LONG time and were well thought of) have been banned during the last few months for nothing more than posting something that questioned something the current administration is doing? I didn't like those in DC ignoring and rewriting the Constitution to suit their own purposes and visions when the Dems were in the white house and I'm not hypocritial enough to tolerate the same things just because the Republicans are doing it now.
"Not surprising. following in the footsteps of many of thinkers who have dared to question the Bush administration here. It's a sad commentary that a civil discussion can't be carried on with a person who doesn't tow the party line."
So why havent you received the Left-foot of Fellowship?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.