Why men should be able to sue women who lie about who's the daddy

JWR ^ | Nov. 27 , 2002 / 22 Kislev, 5763 | Dan Abrams

[jondalar]

So genetics is all?
seems that way..in new york you can raise a step-child
their entire life, but if you divorce their mom..
you have absolutely NO standing to request visitation...
family court wont even accept the petition

Pathetic, man, pathetic.
yes it is...very sad

I thank you for clarifying your
position that a baby one
might raise from birth is actually
no more than a pair of shoes to you.
It goes both ways
~~jondalar

[homeschool mama]

I don't know where you hang out...but the ladies I know, are indeed ladies. Perhaps you should change your surroundings.

[Savage Beast]

Look, these cases are neither difficult nor different. The law should force the woman to name the child's father; he and she should be forced to return all money spent on account of their fraud to the fraud victim; they are responsible for the support of their child. The fraud victim should be legally absolved of all financial obligations concerning their child. Period. It's quite simple.

[Savage Beast]

Wrong. Any statute of limitations fairly begins at the time of discovery of the fraud.

[Savage Beast]

"It's not that hard to do."

You're right; it's not. But the law cannot rightly allow anyone to perpetrate such a fraud. Any such woman must be held accountable to the victim of her fraud. She and the biological father are solely responsible for the child's support. Certainly not the fraud victim!

[RGSpincich]

The paternity test is part the discovery.

Family Law in each state has time periods during, before and after childbirth, that paternity can be questioned. After that time period, paternity cannot be easily challenged.