Posted on 01/30/2003 6:38:26 AM PST by MrLeRoy
Huh he voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion.(Jun 1999)
and
Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
To be fair he has voted against partial birth abortion in 2000 but that was an election year. Seems like Mr. Paul knows where his bread is buttered in election years.
In fact, Judge Kane indicated otherwise:
"I don't favor drugs at all," Kane said.
Not that the facts will stop Dane's abuse of logic and language.
Probably because the federal government has no standing on such laws, as those are state matters. But, given your position on the federal drug war and the 10th Amendment, I hardly expect you to understand the concept of limited government as it applies to other areas of society.
To be fair he has voted against partial birth abortion in 2000 but that was an election year. Seems like Mr. Paul knows where his bread is buttered in election years.
Ron Paul doesn't need to pander to his constituency to get re-elected. But trolls like you find it necessary to impunge his character by questioning his motives.
Jim Robinson is NOT in favor of the current WoD.
They have the guts to call you and me druggies, but will they take it to the logical end?
Still it seems that you want to forget the 60's when the modern drug culture got it's start. Also i can name the one person who is the main moneyman giving money for the pro-drug cause, Hillary friend George Soros.
Bill Buckley writes a couple of articles, but it is uber socialist Soros who is putting his money where his mouth is.
So, wouldn't you then conclude that cultivation for personal use interferes with interstate commerce because, as a result, no commerce occurs? Just a thought.
You're saying that growing your own has no effect in interstate commerce. Sure it does. Affects intrastate commerce, too.
Uh dude, I was referring to Ron Paul in reply #82. Oh I forgot that short term memory problem. Never mind.
Drugs are as old as humanity, Dane. Some of us can read history instead of only having the limited intellectual capacity to remember what they've seen on TV.
Also i can name the one person who is the main moneyman giving money for the pro-drug cause, Hillary friend George Soros.
Goody for you, Dane. You can name one name.
Bill Buckley writes a couple of articles, but it is uber socialist Soros who is putting his money where his mouth is.
Buckley, Friedman, George Schultz, and many others. I could compile an exhaustive list of conservatives questioning the current approach to the war on drugs, Dane, but it wouldn't sway you a bit. Enough to let your lies and propaganda on this thread speak for themselves. BTW, we're still waiting for you to document any pro-abort sentiments voiced by Judge Kane.
--- crickets ---
You guys jump to such absurd ends that it is utterly hilarious.
Again, what is the policy that makes drug dealers sell to children.?Economics 101.
Today's Lesson: Black Markets.
The government bans or limits the consumption of a product. Demand exists beyond what the law allows.
The Law of Supply and Demand is one of the Basic Rules of Economics, as unrepealable as the Law of Gravity. It tells us that demand always creates supply.
The created supply network has banned by the law. Therefore it exists outside the law.
Participants in the network have no effective legal constraints on their behavior. Any and all methods of competion may therefore be used.
The most ruthless competitors take control of the supply network. They recognize no rules or standards of behavior.
The controllers of the supply network have no problem selling to children.
-Eric
I thought only liberals tried this absolutely convoluted view of the commerce clause for justifying federal intrusion into every aspect of our lives. Are you really sure you want to trash what is left of your intellectual reputation on this conservative website?
Under that interpretation, a family's vegetable garden would be subject to Federal regulation.
You may see a 10th amendment issue, I see stopping the spread of the drug culture in which marijuana use is a big component.Statists often have trouble understanding the difference between disapproving of something and wanting it banned by law.
-Eric
Or my mom's quilting or grandma's knitting. Ammo reloading as well. Any product or item one makes for himself/herself would be.
Is anybody surprised?
Show where Judge Kane said anything remotely like "drugs are benign"; that appears to be merely your baldfaced lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.