Posted on 05/04/2005 10:34:48 PM PDT by President of HSCCA Tim Bueler
bump
Jeremiah 1:5
"Before I formed you in the womb I knew [ Or chose ] you, before you were born I set you apart;
One third of those who would have been born after 1973, are not here today. One third of my generation has been aborted.
One of the underlying resons the boarders are open ... the population has to grow some how...
sick, sad .... and speechless
Ping to self for later pingout.
Great, great article.
Hard to believe you're just in high school, or just out of it...
Knowing that there are young people like you gives me hope for the future.
Excellent, cogent piece. Any argument against the above is an exercise in self-delusion.
Well said.
The fight against abortion is a battle for justice for the youngest members of our species who face a cruel and grissly death at the hands of abortionists.
If people would start debating with cold, hard facts and not their emotions we would win this war. Good for you for planting the seed. You forgot one point though. Fetus is Latin for Unborn Offspring and the definition is... : an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind; specifically : a developing human from usually three months after conception to birth. The word Fetus does not prove or mean it's not a Human.
If it's not your DNA, it's not your body and therefore not your choice.
Environment: Again, the unborn are located in a different place, but how does location suddenly change you into a non-human? The only difference between a newborn baby, and an unborn baby is 8 inches of birth canal. How does moving 8 inches, suddenly change a blob of tissue into a human?
From a liberal standpoint, there could be the argument of symbiosis (I know, a stretch) and how if a parasite was attached (hang on) that you would want to remove said parasite (such as a leech) and not think twice about it.
Sadly, many women are duped (or more like delusional) that the cells growing in their womb is parasitic, and needs to be removed. If such women are convinced that they are removing something that isn't human, than they can assure their morality (how brutally ignorant it is.)
Last, Degree of Dependency: If viability is what makes one human, then everyone who is dependent on a pace maker, or some form of medication would be declared non-human. Perhaps you heard about the Siamese twins from Egypt who were in the news last year. One of the twins was physically dependent on the other twin; does this fact mean that one of the twins was not human? Dependency is not a criterion for being human.
The state of Florida has made it where people who are dependent on others for care - the infirm, the elderly, the handicapped, the ones with no voice - can be terminated according to judicial order. This process of dehumanizing the people who are the most vulnerable will lead to a destabilization of the society, such as what happened in the 1930's in Germany.
So, since the liberals won't realize the issue at hand, there has to be an infusion of people to maintain the current population status quo. Since 40 million of my peers have been aborted - and that constitutes actual abortions, not even counting the birth control pills, which is for another smokey back room there has to be adequate population paying into the system to maintain the current spending of the government. If you can't have it by natural population expandsion - children - then you import them. Importation is risky, because the imports don't necessarily assimilate into the society. Sometimes, they force the society to assimilate to them.
Best of luck, and remember to wear your Flame proof jammies when confronting irrational people.
Very true. and, yes, the unborn are persons (notice i choose the term "persons" instead of humans for certain purposes0.
a friend kept repeating to me a phrase to this effect: "it's Fetus, NOT a person."
i pointed out in response that the terms "Fetus" and "person" are no more mutually exlusive than the terms "adolescent" and "person", or "adult" and "person".
The term "Fetus", like "adolescent" and "adult", refers to the stage of developement of a person, NOT to the absence of personhood.
When i first made the point years ago, he just responded "but it's a fetus, NOT a person."
I explained to him the petitio principii/circular reasoning fallacy--he was assuming a fetus meant "non-person" in order to prove a fetus is a "non-person". he still had that attitude, "don't confuse me with facts; my minds already made up."
recently we went over that point again. he seemed a bit softer on his position (he seemed to have doubts), but he may have merely been acting polite.
latinwarrior, see post 12 as well.
btw, do you realize that you have the same FR registration date as freepers java guy and lavender?
Please stop posting your Blog editorials in Activism. Thank you.
it's just a coincidence. java guy and lavender don't post. they (mainly java guy) lurk.
because i'm from Fresno, lol, and so is java guy and lavender.
I searched for java guy and couldn't find him. Are you wondering if I have multiple screen names or something?
lol! no, no, no, don't get nervous on me :o) i know you're not java guy or lavender. i just know them, and i know they signed up on 911. not too many people sign up on 911.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.