Posted on 06/01/2005 8:07:19 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Forgot to on this thread...I did on the other one.
And besides....she butted in on a conversation I was having on the other thread with someone else about the AndyScam money totals why return a courtesy to someone who didn't show any in the first place?
I love that word!
Panglossian, a view held predominately in DUmmie land.
prepares for defenestration
How about "formicarius" to describe DUmmieland?
I always wanted to use that word, "defenestrate," but never had an opportunity.
I have however used "copacetic," which describes the situation opposite that of what the Grand DUmbo "Skinner" calls "the Andy situation."
I saw that. Thats all you will get from him. Remember that this morning he had all the truth and would post it shortly. Also remember AndyScam was supposed to post his answers from JH along with a somewhat neutral 3rd party, as of last night.
crickets chirping loudly
Someone needs to remind both of them.
You can add not being able to or refusing to answer my question about how Scamdy could have known 14 hours in advace of his appointment when he was going to have surgery to the refusal to answer questions about the lie that Pitt, gruntled and badboy told about the date of the surgery and the reason for it's cancellation.
And what is with Jack Daniels decreasing their alcohol content?
Economics. It was either that or raise the price. It already costs and arm and a leg compared to others. Problem is none of the others have quite the same taste or buzz. When I'm not "on the scotch" I drink R&R (Rich and Rare). Has a similiar taste for a lot less dinero.
Funny how Pied Piper Pitt has remained mostly silent about those documents ever since they were shown to be BOGUS. I look forward to watching Pitt's testimony at the AndyScam trial.
Well, I guess I'm guilty of bad-mouthing CU. Cracks me up since they have an entire section dedicated to making fun of the DUmmies. Of course, how would they know they were being bad-mounted if they weren't over here reading the thread. Looks like a case of can dish it out but can't take it. At least I don't go to their neighborhood and call them names.
They loved having everybody over there until they got bored. It's like inviting people to come play in your sandbox and then throwing sand on them. I don't care about the bad words it was the attitude that we were their little playthings and when we didn't dance to their tune they started a flame war.
From my observations, most of the JD drinkers mix it in coke, as in Jack an Coke. Hell iffin you gotta drown it in soda, you might as well order the bar brand. 90% of the Jack and Coke drinkers wouldn't know the difference.
Years ago I came home from work (bedspring factory 2nd shift while attending college) to find my wife and her friend drinking my Johnny Walker Black with coke. I confiscated the bottle and kept it locked up after that.
He did his part....found some willing accomplices at CU that allowed him to get his message to the DUmp.
Now he's turned his lapdogs "Gruntled" and "badboy" loose on CU to keep the spin going.
"It is proof unless you assert that is is forged."
This is from gruntled talking about the document that is supposed to 'prove' this whole thing is on the up and up. Do you think he 'answered' your question txradioguy? LOL!!!
Yup. Thats the definition of Alchohol Abuse.
I think all he's doing is making all of us dizzy with his spin!
Economics. It was either that or raise the price.
JD went from 90 proof to 86 in the 1970s. Now they've gone to 80. You're basically paying the same price for less kick.
Most manufacturers have removed a cup from their "half gallons" of ice cream and just try to find a 33-gallon trash bag that hasn't been downsized to 30.
Meanwhile, the fries at McDonald's and the basic unit of Coca-Cola keeps getting bigger.
SD
For those of you not looking in on the Gruntled fiasco at CU....he's reverting to threatening to know people's "real" IP address and litigation to try and avoid answering questions and to try and intimidate the folks at CU asking the questions and questioning his "proof".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.