Captain, there be trolls here!
Posted on 02/11/2006 3:20:33 AM PST by Lindykim
She has her own website, too, complete with a photo of Linda.
http://www.lindakimball.com
Vanity, thy name is Linda, apparently.
Did poster Lindykim give you permission to publish private information about them? You seem to think you're a real smart ass for 'outing' this person.
Methinks the mods are sleeping in out there in California. It's not even 7 AM there yet.
Well, George, let me help get their attention by hitting the abuse button on your posts here, since revealing a poster's private information without their consent is considered a very serious offense.
Don't violate poster privacy - Don't reveal online another poster's phone number, address, or other information that the person hasn't already made public for everyone on Free Republic.
"Don't violate poster privacy - Don't reveal online another poster's phone number, address, or other information that the person hasn't already made public for everyone on Free Republic. "
The fact that Lindykim is Linda Kimball was acknowledged by her in a recent thread. That there is a lindakimball.com is public, not private information, as a Google search for "Linda Kimball" will demonstrate.
Linda Kimball has a website, where she has links to her articles, as published in various blogs. That is not private information, nor is her identity as the author of these postings.
Sorry, fink, but Linda Kimball outed herself a long time ago.
Linda Kimball has a website, where she has links to her articles, as published in various blogs. That is not private information, nor is her identity as the author of these postings.
Yes, George, if that's the rules then I guess it would be ok with you to post your public Google information:
MineralMan as a registered poster on various forums, some listing your email address, some have your eBay account information, some your home selling web site link (with a photo of you), your Mineral selling website (with photo of you), your phone number, and on and on. But that does not mean you want any of that PUBLIC GOOGLE INFORMATION posted here. Does it? Or are you going to be a complete hypocrite when it comes to 'your private information'?
If that was true, Mm would not have been thought himself so 'clever' for publishing the info he did.
"MineralMan as a registered poster on various forums, some listing your email address, some have your eBay account information, some your home selling web site link (with a photo of you), your Mineral selling website (with photo of you), your phone number, and on and on. But that does not mean you want any of that PUBLIC GOOGLE INFORMATION posted here. Does it? Or are you going to be a complete hypocrite when it comes to 'your private information'?"
My friend, I do not post vanities using that information, do I? It's never hard to find out who someone really is if you want to. I do recommend that you not post that information, since I have not made it public here, nor do I intend to do so.
Lindykim is Linda Kimball, and posts her own material here. She has said that she is Linda Kimball, and the information on her site includes other articles of hers, as well as links to other sites. It is a blog.
Does it have personal information on it? I don't know. I have not looked for such.
You're stretching the point here. Nothing I posted reveals anything about Lindykim that is not already public knowledge here on FR.
What you propose to reveal about me is not public knowledge, and finding it is not based on a simple Google search. Do not post it.
Further, some of that information you think you have is no doubt incorrect. Be very careful.
You think MM pats himself on the back for figuring out that a poster whose FReepname is lindykim, and who posts frequent opinion pieces authored by Linda Kimball, isn't one and the same person as the author of the opinion pieces?
You should perhaps consider that what for you is a brilliant deduction might for others be a pretty darn obvious and mundane conclusion.
First, your wrong about that. It was very simple indeed.
Second, you're very sloppy and have left all of your info 'out there'. I mean really?! You sign up here under the same name you use elsewhere, with enough 'what I do, where I am' info to make the match a virtual cinch, and are surprised? Not too smart are we?
And thirdly, rest assured, I would not post your info under any circumstances, period!
"Second, you're very sloppy and have left all of your info 'out there'. I mean really?! You sign up here under the same name you use elsewhere, with enough 'what I do, where I am' info to make the match a virtual cinch, and are surprised? Not too smart are we?"
As you have no doubt discovered, there are a lot of "MineralMans" out there. From what you have written, some of your information is incorrect. Some of it is probably correct.
You are right. Most people who believe themselves to be anonymous are not. If I really wished to be anonymous, trust me, I know how to do that. Perhaps I have done just that. Perhaps not.
I have no doubt that what you believe to be my information has been passed around in private messages. That's fine, but the information you have is incorrect, at least in part.
I do not publicly reveal my identity on Free Republic. That's my choice, as it is yours. It's possible to discover my identity, as it is possible to discover almost anyone's.
I will say this to you: If you believe you have my identity, I caution you not to use it in any way that might be considered threatening. That has happened in the past to me, and did not end happily for the person doing the threatening.
I love you madly, BB, but you couldn't be more wrong about this. Marxism's "to each according to his needs" is pretty much the opposite of natural selection.
A source that most creationists accept, the Institute for Creation Research, has this article posted at their website:
Darwin's Influence on Ruthless Laissez Faire Capitalism. Yes, ICR links Darwin to good ol' capitalism.
It is beyond dispute that Marx wrote most of his work about communism before Darwin published Origin of Species, so there is zero intellectual influence of Darwin on Marx. Marx's final work, Das Kapital, came out later, but it makes no reference to Darwin or to evolution. All of Marx's earlier writings on communism were done before the world had heard of Darwin and his theory of evolution. So I repeat -- Darwin had zero intellectual influence on Marx.
And of course, vice versa. Nothing in Darwin's work even remotely hints at anything resembling communism. The two men lived at the same time, but they no more influenced one another than did Idi Amin and Ronald Reagan
I know that you don't think much of Darwin, but to link his work to Marx is just plain inaccurate.
Can I make a simple suggestion to stop doing whatever it is that makes people want to threaten you? I mean if that is a reoccurring problem, maybe some self-examination is in order...
I have no doubt that what you believe to be my information has been passed around in private messages.
That I would not know anything about, have never participated in, in any way, shape, or form, and would not.
... a rip-off of the Beech Starship design, IMHO.
"That I would not know anything about, have never participated in, in any way, shape, or form, and would not."
Good.
Darwinian man, though well-behaved, at best is only a monkey shaved.-- W. S. Gilbert
Wow, you really need to read a little more mythology. And a lot more history.
Cool it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.