Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Wins Big in Alabama(Landslide Republican Victory
Ron Paul (2008) ^ | August 18, 2007

Posted on 08/18/2007 1:36:47 PM PDT by Captain Kirk

Ron Paul received 216 votes for a commanding first-place finish in a straw poll today sponsored by the West Alabama Republican Assembly. Mitt Romney came in second with 14 votes.

The poll was open to Alabama residents.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.ronpaul2008.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: al2008; asseenonstormfront; howlongolord; iowa; makeitstop; paul; paulestinian; paulestinians; ronpaul; strawpoll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Hillary cannot win without a Ross Perot type of candidate in the race as an alternative for conservative voters and she knows it. In my opinion, the current dissatisfaction with the GOP sets the stage for an alternative party like Perot in the ‘90s.

Will it be Ron Paul? I don’t know. I wasn’t aware that he has stated he wouldn’t run 3rd party.

As to being nervous. Anything that increases Her Heinous Hillary’s chances of winning makes me very nervous indeed.


101 posted on 08/18/2007 3:51:20 PM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Us bra burning, baby killin’, wealfare homos in the rest of the party will stick with a winner...

You're voting for Hillary?
.
102 posted on 08/18/2007 3:52:46 PM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: lfrancis

Yes I do. Spent more than a bit of research time with their papers in my day. Indeed I used them to support my own conservative arguments. How far they have drifted from their original path. I know there is a core still there, but time has usurped the cause. Robert Welch is a name I have not heard in some time though. Canadian wasn’t he? To far back in the cob webs...


103 posted on 08/18/2007 3:54:48 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: deport

Well normally I don’t either, but calling out a kooky fringe group under these conditions...


104 posted on 08/18/2007 3:55:54 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: radioman

Only if she shaves her pits...

Oh, she has...

Ick...


105 posted on 08/18/2007 3:56:55 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
You don't know what the Hell you're talking about.

Your argument is just as incoherent as your screenname.

106 posted on 08/18/2007 3:57:22 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Drango

It’s not getting any funnier.


107 posted on 08/18/2007 3:59:18 PM PDT by JTN (‘We achieve much more in peace than…unconstitutional, undeclared wars’ - Dr. Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
No, I mean his stubborn dogmatic isolationism (whether appropriate or not), and failure to appreciate that we interact in a world that is MUCH more interconnected than it was back in the days of the privateers going after the pirates.

Paul supports interacting with nations, via trade.
That's much different than meddling in the affairs of other nations, giving them massive foreign aid boondoggles (which will be used against us) and such.

108 posted on 08/18/2007 3:59:55 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Bingo!


109 posted on 08/18/2007 4:00:50 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Wouldn't that mean that his numbers are just bunk?

No, it simply means that a loud-mouth minority of kooks from the far left & right are trying to drown out the decent folks from all walks of life who make up Paul's base of support.

110 posted on 08/18/2007 4:02:00 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
The only way Hillary will win is if the GOP stupidly nominates ultra-liberals Rudy or Romney for President.

You have nothing to fear from Paul, and in fact should be grateful that he's in the race. He is drawing a lot of people who never cared for politics before, independents, and small L libertarians back into the old Reagan coalition.

111 posted on 08/18/2007 4:05:19 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

“How far they have drifted from their original path.”

I don’t know if they have strayed that far.

I used to read back editions from the ‘60’s of “American Opinion” when I should have been studying calculus. I subscribed to the “The New American” up until about a year ago. Thought it was a pretty good conservative magazine at times. Then they would have an edition about all the conspiracy BS.

I know Ron Paul always is/was the lone U.S. Representative with a 100 rating on their conservative index.


112 posted on 08/18/2007 4:05:53 PM PDT by lfrancis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: JTN
Isn't it amazing how a single ping to a RP thread, probably the first in over a week, and suddenly we've got over a hundred posts?

I checked the three FredThreads on his little appearance in Iowa. Those threads had 67, 33, 22 posts on them. The Romney threads are even more anemic. Threads for Huckabee and Tancredo hardly exist.

So for all the blather from the Paul-haters, RP must be doing something right.
113 posted on 08/18/2007 4:06:12 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

>> Paul supports interacting with nations, via trade. That’s much different than meddling in the affairs of other nations

I see.

So Dr. Paul’s response to 9-11 would have been to /trade/ with Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq?

Sounds like another leftist position to me. “We’ve got to understand why they hate us” and all that baloney.


114 posted on 08/18/2007 4:06:37 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Humor is often lost on fools and ignoramuses.

Well, humor is humor, isn't it? Still, on the other hand, water is water! And east is east and west is west and if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb does. Now, uh... now you tell me what you know.
.
115 posted on 08/18/2007 4:07:15 PM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Only if she shaves her pits...
ROFL!!!
.
116 posted on 08/18/2007 4:11:37 PM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

216 votes? And how many people of voting age live in that state? You’re excited about 216 votes? How pathetic. The delusional will grasp at straws even when the straws are on fire.


117 posted on 08/18/2007 4:11:50 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
There was a landslide in Alabama? Was it caused by an earthquake or flash flood?

Neither. It was the

118 posted on 08/18/2007 4:12:14 PM PDT by JTN (‘We achieve much more in peace than…unconstitutional, undeclared wars’ - Dr. Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk; Allegra; dighton; jdm
I made a typo and said Iowa instead of Alabama. Gee whiz, it wasn’t on purpose.


119 posted on 08/18/2007 4:14:14 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
No, it simply means that a loud-mouth minority of kooks from the far left & right are trying to drown out the decent folks from all walks of life who make up Paul's base of support.

If the "load-mouthed kooks" were drowning out his "base of support"...wouldn't that mean that his base is very quiet? Or, does that mean that his numbers are wrong and those voting for him are "loud-mouthed kooks"? Which is it??

120 posted on 08/18/2007 4:23:45 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson