Skip to comments.OMG. US Supreme Court to rule on stay of Electoral College vote
Posted on 12/03/2008 12:04:20 AM PST by OL Hickory
She informed me that Mr. Donofrios application was first referred to the full Court by Justice Clarence Thomas on November 19, 2008. After that referral took place the full Court, and not Justice Thomas alone, distributed the application for an emergency stay for Conference of December 5, 2008
(Excerpt) Read more at teachers.net ...
Could there still be TRUTH, JUSTICE and the AMERICAN WAY in the USA?!?!
We’re about to find out!
Well, there should not be problem since 7 or the 9 Justices were appointed by Republican Presidents.
October 26, 2004 2004 debate with Barack Obama #3
Check out what was said about 50 minutes into the debate.
MODERATOR: Abolish the Electoral College? Yes or no?
Check this out!
Kenyans Need Not Apply! ...bump
A joy to watch!
I Believe! I Believe! ...I Believe!
If the SCOTUS fails us our freedom is lost.
If there is a shred of doubt regarding Obama’s birth certificate and it is not addressed and later it turns out that he is ineligible, the Supreme Court loses all credibility.
And for people who are worried about the reaction of the Obamabots if he is not sworn in, think about the reaction after the fact. NOTHING stays secret! Bringing down the President because he was ineligible would blow Watergate away. And as far as the Democratic party goes, they will have committed suicide, they would be done for good.
Obama did not win in a huge landslide like Reagan did. While there are some hardcore Obamabots, as we have seen, most didn’t know what the heck they were voting for. But I’ll tell you what, a lot of those so called Obama voters will be mighty angry if it turns out he knew he was ineligible and ran anyway.
Please send $5 or $10, we are only a few dollars away from being able to bring this forward......
I'm not setting myself up for Schandefraude, but if this works, I'll party with y'all.
Hey, I’ll 2nd that! Democrat news produced by ABC, CBS and NBC is no longer watched in my home.
Exactly right. I think it would be equivalent to the Dredd Scott decision. People a hundred years into the future will look back and shake their head, asking "What was that court thinking???"
Bama as the presumptive winner of election 2008 and a supposed lawyer in good standing could put alll these questions to rest in a heartbeat by telling the vault keepers in Hawaii to present his hidden birth certificate for the whole world to see.
Obama WILL be sworn in on 20 Jan.
There is a better chance that Al Gore will admit that he was wrong about global warming than the SCOTUS actually staying the vote by the Electoral College.
It won’t happen.
Both Obama and Michelle do NOT have law licenses.
the records now show that he surrendered his license at some point in 2008. The Illinois Bar Association’s web site search results say:Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year 2008.
Oddly enough, Michelle’s license records are very suspect. She was initially licensed on May 12, 1989. However, her status shows: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year: 1993.Believe me, after putting up with all the crap associated with law school and the bar exam, relinquishing one’s license a mere four years after getting it is very, very odd, particularly as Obamao had only been licensed for a couple of years or so.
BUT, without a doubt the most interesting information is found in the field related to Michelle’s malpractice insurance coverage whereby it says the following instead of the coverage details:No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.
Why would a court issue such an order?
THAT we do not know. This was sent to me. It came from the Illinois Bar Association. Things that make you go HMMMMM!
No -- if SCOTUS fails us, their credibility is lost.
This came up earlier. It was said by other Freepers that this is the way IL does it. It all goes through the court. which I think is weird but the way IL does it.
Oh, why not. Google say's it's up 30%.
Exactly right. This will just be the Supreme Court putting this whole thing to rest once and for all. Nothing more. Whether or not he is actually eligible to be president is irrelevant at this point. Prepare for the rubber stamp job.
~ SPOT ON !!! ~
I believe you are right. Many voters were caught up in the idea of a minority candidate achieving the highest office, but that doesn't mean they would have knowingly voted for an ineligible candidate.
That fact....doesn’t seem to mean much historically.
I wonder why the MSM / DBM didn't look into this...but gave Mr. Palin an anal exam.
Bookmark for later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.