Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bailout Consensus Beginning to Crumble?
NetRight Nation ^ | May 5, 2009 | Isaac MacMillen

Posted on 05/05/2009 9:19:59 AM PDT by NetRight Nation

It appears that the much ballyhooed “bailout consensus” is finally starting to crumble. But, only time will tell.

In a shocking turn of events, a nearly a dozen long-standing Democrats broke ranks with their party leadership—and the high-riding Obama Administration—to give the Republicans enough upport to turn back what could have been a deadly contractual crisis, one that plunged the courts into a bureaucratic abyss.

The Senators joined forces in opposing a cloture vote on H.R. 1106, a bill that would have licensed bankruptcy judges to “help” banks and debtors who find themselves unable to fulfill their financial obligations. In an unprecedented judicial power grab, the bill would have granted the courts authority to renegotiate mortgages, reset contracts to allow borrowers to avoid foreclosure—and force their banks to eat the cost. And for those banks that are risking collapse, the judges could perform their own mini-bailouts—taxpayer-subsidized, of course.

(Excerpt) Read more at netrightnation.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bailout; bailouts; bho44; economy; obama; tarp

1 posted on 05/05/2009 9:19:59 AM PDT by NetRight Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NetRight Nation

There was a consensus?


2 posted on 05/05/2009 9:21:47 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

There’s hope. If there’s a dozen D Senators that realized that this gunpoint negotiation with bondholders was a suicidal idea for everyone, then there really is a bit of hope.


3 posted on 05/05/2009 9:23:57 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NetRight Nation
In an unprecedented judicial power grab, the bill would have granted the courts authority to renegotiate mortgages, reset contracts to allow borrowers to avoid foreclosure—and force their banks to eat the cost. And for those banks that are risking collapse, the judges could perform their own mini-bailouts—taxpayer-subsidized, of course.

But when you spread other people's wealth around, it's good for everyone. Obama already said so. Does this mean some democrats actually disagree with The One?

4 posted on 05/05/2009 9:26:38 AM PDT by TurtleUp (Turtle up: cancel optional spending until 2012, and boycott TARP/stimulus companies forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurtleUp
Does this mean some democrats actually disagree with The One?

Nope, it means they want to get re-elected next year, and the financial industry is the source of substantial campaign contributions. Individuals going through BK... not so much.

5 posted on 05/05/2009 9:34:12 AM PDT by gieriscm (07 FFL / 02 SOT - www.extremefirepower.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NetRight Nation
Max Baucus and Jon Tester (both MT)
Mark Pryor and Blanche Lincoln (both AR)
Ben Nelson (NE)
Mary Landrieu (LA)
Tim Johnson (SD)
Thomas Carper (DE)
Robert Byrd (WV)
Michael Bennett (CO)
6 posted on 05/05/2009 9:42:17 AM PDT by BubbaBasher ("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson