Skip to comments.O'Reilly vs. Salon's Joan Walsh, The Part Where It Really Got Heated (Video)
Posted on 06/12/2009 11:56:29 PM PDT by Talkradio03
I know there was a UFC fight tonight, I didn't know it was on Foxnews, Joan Walsh gets blasted after she said people like Bill were creating the atmosphere for the violence that we've seen on the news. This really got heated,... I'm surprised she went on....
(Excerpt) Read more at hotairpundit.blogspot.com ...
I am completely against the killing of this guy, but it truly is amazing how people like this Salon person blithely dismiss his multiple murders of the unborn.
That was a great exchange, what a sick, demented, twisted, female ditz!
I don’t always care for Bill, but he took her to the mat. Her only answer was the procedure was legal. Lots of things are legal, but that doesn’t make them morally right. I’m looking forward to reading the next issue of Salon.
Ditto that Darkwolf, I think O’Reilly has recently said some dumb things about FR, but MSNBC has been trying so very hard to link the violence on the news to talkradio and anyone on the right, they are really shameless...
Today on Hardball, Sarah Palin’s benign comments about the government were highlighted by Chris Matthews as inciting hate..
Wonder if Matthews has ever seen a “Special Comment”
Lefties like this woman and Garafalo and Olberman seem like cultists to me, and I have worked with people with mental incapacity, so I know of what I speak.
Liberal can’t face the truth. They always create “diversions”.
We’re in a battle and we’d better realize it and deal with it!
Nice. And I like the line about blood on her hands. All pro-choice activists have blood on their hands.
In one case, a money-hungry abortionist was murdered by a radical abortion foe. Even though pro-lifers denounced the killing, the media blamed it on them.
In the second case, a soldier was shot by a Muslim opponent of our involvement in Iraq & Afghanistan. This got less media attention than the murder of the abortionist, and there was zero effort to blame all liberals or all Iraq War opponents or anti-war commentators such as Olbermann & Schultz for the killing.
In the third case, a security guard was murdered when an aged loon shot up the Holocaust Museum. This got a ton of coverage, just like the abortionist killing, but unlike the soldier killing. The nutcase killer holds a variety of views. He hates both Obama & Bush. He hates Jews, but also hates Christianity. He's a 9/11 “truther”. He's a registered Democrat. But somehow the media are calling him “right-wing” and blaming his rampage on conservative commentators, none of whom share the beliefs which apparently motivated his violence.
Obviously an organized effort is underway to demonize conservative dissent in America with outright lies and smear tactics, and selective reporting.
Geez, thanks FRiend, think I’d rather see Helen Thomas.
Ping for home viewing.
The Liberal Left: Direct evidence that there’s been a Taliban in this country for a long, long time.....they just don’t smell as bad.
All I want is a Constitutional Amendment that says I have the same freedom of speech as liberal/commie/Alinskyites do.
White trash can’t use the ‘N’ word, but nothing wrong when black trash so-called rap’artists’ use it; and liberal elitists can call anyone they want the ‘N’ word (or anything else for that matter) - when the ‘N’ stands for Nazi.
This country needs a Constitutional Amendment outlawing Political Correctness and Hate Speech/Crime laws.
Here’s the regular youtube link for those who, like me, always get that annoying “operation aborted” popup (ironic, huh?) whenever they go to the hotairpundit site:
Leave the "new constitutional conventions" to the libs. We need to exercise our freedoms, and not allow THEM to set the agenda and decide what is "OK" speech and what isn't. We're no better than the libs if we start fine-tuning the rules when the rules are on our side already.
Don’t you wish you hadn’t said that? You know what we are going to get, sooner or later.
that is rock bottom ;)
wth happened to her? she really look like that? photoshopped?
Watching Walsh say “it’s legal” (late term abortion) is looking into the face of Mengele and his fellow nazis. They are one and the same. She’s heartless and has no conscience.
Please tell me that’s phtotoshopped because if it’s not, her plastic surgeon doesn’t like her much, either.
Walsh went on a tirade about BOR inciting violence. She ought to look in the mirror.
What does that mean?
What I believe it consists of is a misleading and false defense mechanism she has constructed for her public image and for own conscience.
By defining herself as a "Pro-Choice Catholic" - she can try to dig her fingernails into some modicum of Christian morality and authority, without ever really following God's word, Christ, or the teachings of the Catholic Church.
A good gig if you can get it. Essentially "I speak for God, my way."
God will not be mocked.
There is no such thing as a pro-choice Catholic.
Only those who hav fallen from their religion.
Which aparently is quit a few of them.
She also lost by 1) not answering the questions asked, as typical of liberals of her ilk, and 2) by justifying the murder/killing of nearly 42 million worldwide and 1.37 million in the US because it is “legal”.
I have stated this before in varying threads on this subject matter or the like: how can one profess to be a Christian and believe that abortion is ok?
Maybe, I am clueless or perhaps I fail at understanding God, but I do not believe one can make such a ludicrous claim....a claim that she used when she said she is a “pro-choice Catholic.”
I see them every Sunday.
I liked the part where she said she was a “pro-choice Catholic.” O’Reilly let that pass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.