Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov Perry: “there's no bigger endorsement in the Republican universe” then Governor Palin
http://governorpalin4president.blogspot.com/2009/06/gov-perry-theres-no-bigger-endorsement.html ^

Posted on 06/20/2009 8:23:21 PM PDT by MaxCUA

Governor Perry had harsh words for Republicans in Washington, projected confidence that Republicans can make a comeback in 2010, questioned why Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison would challenge him in the primary race for governor, and talked about Governor Palin's endorsement of his campaign.

Clearly, Governor Perry is proud of his record as governor, and his talking points reflect that. During our interview, he often guided the conversation toward his record as governor of the Lone Star State. For example, he told me: We continued to cut taxes ... to pass the most sweeping tort reform in the nation in 2003 ... we balanced our budget, we left $9 billion in our rainy day fund, we passed the most sweeping eminent domain for private property owners in the history of the state ... We did all that with a recession going on.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2009endorsements; governor; palin; perry; texas; tx2010

1 posted on 06/20/2009 8:23:22 PM PDT by MaxCUA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

So does Palin endorsing a rino like Perry make Palin a rino too ?


2 posted on 06/20/2009 8:26:52 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

In the next few years, Palin will be collecting IOUs and friends. Come 2012 or 2016, they will be cashed in.

They’re not calling Mittens or the Huckster....they’re calling PALIN.


3 posted on 06/20/2009 8:29:32 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

If Perry is a RINO, then KBH is da Mother of all RINOS

....just sayin


4 posted on 06/20/2009 8:30:40 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Not a question a conservative would ask or contemplate.


5 posted on 06/20/2009 8:31:19 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ak267
In the next few years, Palin will be collecting IOUs and friends. Come 2012 or 2016, they will be cashed in.

If Sarah Palin doesn't get the nod in 2012 I predict she's through. Just like Hillary will never get the nod now.

6 posted on 06/20/2009 8:31:41 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

I think Rick’s got a thang for Sarah.


7 posted on 06/20/2009 8:33:31 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( Don't mess with the mockingbird! /\/\ http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA
And I'd vote for Ma Richardson first. She was just a used up old alky. He ain't got my vote.

/johnny

8 posted on 06/20/2009 8:33:55 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (God Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ak267
They’re not calling Mittens or the Huckster....they’re calling PALIN.

Right on! Because "There is no bigger endorsement in the Republican universe"!! And they ALL know it.
9 posted on 06/20/2009 8:34:06 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

At this stage, I would call Perry smart. He know the effect Sarah has on the base, and even some “independents”. I’m not all that sure about his policies as governor, but if he starts acting like Sarah on fiscal issues, I’m sure he can count on large swathe of the social-conservative base that follows Sarah.


10 posted on 06/20/2009 8:34:20 PM PDT by ABQHispConservative (A Blue Dog Democrat is an oxyMoron!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

Follow Gov. Perry on Twitter
https://twitter.com/GovernorPerry


11 posted on 06/20/2009 8:36:33 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Right on! Because "There is no bigger endorsement in the Republican universe"!! And they ALL know it.

Just ask Saxby Chambliss.

12 posted on 06/20/2009 8:41:35 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

“If Sarah Palin doesn’t get the nod in 2012 I predict she’s through. Just like Hillary will never get the nod now.”

Not quite following the Hillary analogy. Sarah is 15 to 20 years younger and Hillary is overshadowed by Obama. Palin is not overshadowed (at the moment) by anyone she would have to run against.


13 posted on 06/20/2009 8:41:58 PM PDT by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

I respectfully disagree. Hillary’s age, her baggage, and the fact she’ll would have to fight “O” in 2012 (who will have the advantages of being an incumbent with a large war chest, support base and ACORN) has made her a “one and done” candidate.

Sarah’s options are a little more varied. She could run for President in 2012, wait to 2016, run for Senate or stay the govenor. She’s still young and has popular support with the conservative base.


14 posted on 06/20/2009 8:42:37 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA
GO SARAH GO!

HOW SARAH PALIN TRUMPS LIBERALISM



MANY MORE STICKER DESIGNS HERE

15 posted on 06/20/2009 8:43:51 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

16 posted on 06/20/2009 8:58:34 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
“I think Rick's got a thang for Sarah.”

I'm not sayin’ that it's right, I'm just sayin’
that I can certainly see why he'd have a thang
for Sarah.

BTW, the last time I used the word “thang” on this site,
a lynch mob came after me.

17 posted on 06/20/2009 9:02:33 PM PDT by Markos33 (Third World trickle up poverty, will lead to cascading Third World tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

" Governor Perry: “there's no bigger endorsement in the Republican universe” then Governor Palin "

Huh?

Isn't that "THAN"?

Go SARAH!!

18 posted on 06/20/2009 9:06:20 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

No, its payback for Kay Bailey.


19 posted on 06/20/2009 9:08:38 PM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

it’s like the GOP is playing to lose.

odds are good that the GOP will not ‘give her the nod’... since they are about as left as the middle of the road dems. they have demonstrator numerous times that they are not interested in conservatives.

not a shock to me. my congresscritters have done nothing for 10+ years, except do the bare minimum to get re-elected.

as for being represented... LOL... not only am i not represented, me and my kind are vilified and attacked regularly in the media and by government officials.


20 posted on 06/20/2009 9:43:41 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
To quote old Ma Richardson at the demo. convention a few years back...”poor George, he can't hep it, he was born with a silver shoe in his mouth:” I had to laugh because poor George's son sent her packin.....at the next election..
21 posted on 06/20/2009 9:45:49 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ak267

Palin will be a party bigfoot and viable Presidential candidate for the next twenty or thirty years. She need not rush things. She might find a turn as Senator, Energy Secretary, or talk show host to her liking for a while,and not as hard on her family. The day she decides to run for the top job, I’m all in for her, be it in 2012 or 2032.


22 posted on 06/20/2009 9:49:11 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

.........by the way, that's a bogus website which apparently is a haven for bugs. It just replicated itself 50 times (opened 50 Browser windows) on my computer.

Bogus.

23 posted on 06/20/2009 10:05:41 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

Ann Richards, not Richardson


24 posted on 06/20/2009 10:12:15 PM PDT by brushcop (SFC Sallie, CPL Long, LTHarris, SSG Brown, PVT Simmons KIA OIF lll&V, they died for you, honor them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: brushcop

Thanks for the correction, I was close...:O)


25 posted on 06/20/2009 10:20:27 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

I thought it was “silver foot.”


26 posted on 06/20/2009 10:29:56 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ak267
Sarah’s options are a little more varied. She could run for President in 2012, wait to 2016, run for Senate or stay the govenor.

Why would she wait until 2016? She's popular now and needs to strike while the iron is hot. There is no Republican incumbent to run against in 2012, which might not be the case in 2016. B Hussein is making a terrible mess of things so 2012 would be her best chance and certainly the logical choice. By 2016 there would probably be some up and coming Republicans to contend with should the Rats win in 2012. And if she runs in 2012 and loses, forget about 2016. Anymore, it's a one-time shot. I don't see a Richard Nixon comeback ever happening again in my lifetime.

As for a Senate run, I really don't think she'll try to fracture the party and run against Lisa Murkowski in 2010 and then turn right around and run for president. Murkowski is not as unpopular as her father was. And the seat held by Democrat Mark Begich won't be in the running until 2014. No way is she going to run for that and turn right around to run for 2016, assuming she wins. And a loss would doom her for 2016. The only way she would run for the Senate is if she runs for president in 2012 and doesn't win. Then the Senate seat would be her consolation prize in 2014.

27 posted on 06/21/2009 12:23:24 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
It's confirmed that Palin is not running for Murkowski's seat. She is planning to campaign with Murkowski in 2010.
28 posted on 06/21/2009 1:16:07 AM PDT by DJ Republica (Sarah Palin is my commander-in-chief. Obama can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

LOL Since you are the second one to correct me on old ma Richards, I guess I am dumber than I though..


29 posted on 06/21/2009 1:35:19 AM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

I remember some of the sheer nastiness from folks like her and “Lord” Bentsen. In those days, the media would call it funny or “feisty.” If a Republican had made comments like that about Democrats, it would’ve been described as sardonic and mean spirited.

Rush used to do an impersonation of Ma’s line, “Pooooooorrrrr Geooooorggggge, heee cayynnt hayp eet, heee wuzz boooooorrnnn wuth a seeelllverrr foooooooooot eeen heees moooooowwwthhhh !”

Imagine George, Sr. responding with, “Poor Ma, she can’t hep it, she was born with a silver flask in her purse.”


30 posted on 06/21/2009 1:55:49 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Your last line is a beaut....chuckles to you..


31 posted on 06/21/2009 2:13:37 AM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
So does Palin endorsing a rino like Perry make Palin a rino too ?

Giggle.

...I’m readin’ on my Starbuck’s mocha cup, okay, the quote of the day? You’ll never believe what the quote was. It was Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State, and U.N. Ambassador. And Madeleine has as her quote of the day for Starbuck’s — now she said it, I didn’t — she said, ‘There’s a place in hell for women who don’t support other women.’
- Sarah Palin, Rally Carson CA 10/04/08

Gee, Sarah, I guess you really didn't take the Starbucks cup to heart.

32 posted on 06/21/2009 5:11:45 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA
Gov Perry: “there's no bigger endorsement in the Republican universe” then Governor Palin

"then" Governor Palin?

try "than"

33 posted on 06/21/2009 12:02:54 PM PDT by IDontLikeToPayTaxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson