Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orly Taitz Flock Shootin'
Lame Cherry ^ | 0/19/09 | staff

Posted on 09/19/2009 9:56:00 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-273 next last
Interesting
1 posted on 09/19/2009 9:56:00 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant
Seems that Orly has been given a "wedge issue" ...the silver spike to drive into the beast.

Let's hope she takes up the hammer (que Apple 1984 video)

2 posted on 09/19/2009 10:02:15 PM PDT by spokeshave (Obama can't unjump the shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Before the zombies can devour her.


3 posted on 09/19/2009 10:02:55 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Frankly, I wouldn’t trust Orly Taitz to get me out of a jaywalking ticket. She’s an embarassment and only serves to embolden those on the left, not those who would rightly question the policies of Obama and the liberal left.


4 posted on 09/19/2009 10:03:03 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Policies are one thing. Legitimacy is another. Obama is a marxist quisling and a fraud. You can accept that POS as your president if you want.


5 posted on 09/19/2009 10:07:21 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Fine--but she's going about it the wrong way. Oh, and do you think for one second that even if Obama were to be removed from office, that Slow Joe or Stretch Pelosi would be any better?

I don't WANT him as my president, but it is what it is. This is no different than the DU "selected not elected" crap we had to listen to for eight years. I challenge you to tell me otherwise.
6 posted on 09/19/2009 10:11:11 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: OCCASparky

Fine. I said go ahead and accept the marxist quisling. That’s your choice. THe rest of us will expose this fraudulence.


8 posted on 09/19/2009 10:13:53 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The records will eventually come out. I pray that it is soon, and would just as soon have Orly get the job done. She has been flogging this for a while. Not sure she has the stature of reputation to handle this, but she might just nail him.

If this scherade is allowed to go on the damage to the nation may be terminal. This must not happen.

Because of the apparent scale of the coverup here, I am beginning to think the tinfoil hat crowd are not as crazy as some think. I cannot understand why most of the Pubbies are so silent on this. I know some of them want to see a global government, and the little thing of our Constitution stands in the way. If they are a party to this, then Treason will apply to them also. Very Serious accusations.


9 posted on 09/19/2009 10:14:06 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from what source it may. -Sam Houston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
pissant, you're betting on the wrong horse. She's not even qualified to be an ambulance chaser. Whatever her motivation besides blind hatred of Obama, she doesn't care who she has to screw over to get what she wants. You'd do well to avoid this woman and her agenda at all costs.

http://www2.wrbl.com/rbl/news/local/article/10000_sanction_proposed_against_birther_lawyer/93364/
10 posted on 09/19/2009 10:16:20 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Oh, and do you think for one second that even if Obama were to be removed from office, that Slow Joe or Stretch Pelosi would be any better?
***In that scenario, the constitution wins. So, yes it is better.


11 posted on 09/19/2009 10:17:11 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
Frankly, I wouldn’t trust Orly Taitz to get me out of a jaywalking ticket. She’s an embarassment and only serves to embolden those on the left...

In that she is doing the frontal approach that is necessary to expose the judiciary protection racket, I think she's okay. But her lack of emotional discipline is stripping away her gains by making her histrionics the focus, rather than her court results. In this, she's playing right into the governments hands, by diverting attention away from the legal inconsistancies she's uncovering. It's very frustrating to watch her keep messing up her own legitimacy, and empowering her own dismissals.

12 posted on 09/19/2009 10:18:17 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
This is no different than the DU "selected not elected" crap we had to listen to for eight years. I challenge you to tell me otherwise.

Otherwise! There was no evidence that W was not constitutionally qualified to hold the office of President. Obozo by his own actions indicates that there is great doubt that he is. When the truth is finally know about him, there will be a lot of collateral damage. The protective cover for him is so enormous, that it begs for the enormous answer.

13 posted on 09/19/2009 10:18:50 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from what source it may. -Sam Houston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

No need to link anything for me. I’ve read everything there is to read regarding Obama and the cases against him.

I’m not betting on ANYBODY. I’m instead encouraging EVERYONE to learn about the malfeasance and help expose this marxist quisling.


14 posted on 09/19/2009 10:19:49 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Fine. I said go ahead and accept the marxist quisling. That’s your choice. THe rest of us will expose this fraudulence.

Like I said, "selected not elected". The whole "nirther" movement is sounding just as unhinged as the DU/Kos/Huffpo crowd. Elections DO have consequences. Just because you don't like the results doesn't mean 1--it wasn't legit, 2--you're going to change it.

Lemme guess--the REAL long form BC is in a Diebold machine which Karl Rove has stolen with help from the PNAC and Halliburton? If you want to be totally honest, you sound THAT unhinged.

Again, focus more on his POLICIES. Perhaps the reason we're not see a resolution to this issue is that the Democrats WANT you to chase your tails and waste your energy on this issue, rather than prevent their agenda from being implemented. Did you stop to consider that for a moment?
15 posted on 09/19/2009 10:20:05 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Seems that this judge could be hoisted on his own petard. Wouldn’t that be sweet.


16 posted on 09/19/2009 10:20:48 PM PDT by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Then accept your overlord. Fine by me. I happen to know he’s a marxst quisling, so I won’t.


17 posted on 09/19/2009 10:21:27 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
In that scenario, the constitution wins. So, yes it is better.

So tell me, what exactly does the Constitution say should happen in this case, pray tell? Have ya'll thought that far ahead yet? Lemme give you a little food for thought:

The whole BC issue was brought up well before the election. The American people didn't care, and a majority voted for him. It sucks, but they did.

The Electoral College (i.e., the states) OFFICALLY elected him in December. Congress validated the results. One procedural issue was that one Senator and one Representative COULD have challenged the results. No such challenge occured.

Even Chief Justice Roberts has determined that there is no legal standing for any of this.

Like I said, chasing your own tails.
18 posted on 09/19/2009 10:23:41 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

IOW, you’ve already made up your mind, and you refuse to accept anything that would challenge your beliefs. Got it. Wow. I sure hope you don’t go around pointing out the left and their unhinged behavior. Hypocrisy and all that, dontcha know?


19 posted on 09/19/2009 10:25:27 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Might, might, might, how many accusers. Just like the book of Job. (the old testament.)Job had many accusers and what did God said:...read it you’ll find out.


20 posted on 09/19/2009 10:25:59 PM PDT by Lily4Jesus ( Jesus Saves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson