Skip to comments.Napolitano Investigating Pro-Lifers, not Terrorists!
Posted on 02/09/2010 12:40:30 PM PST by Peter Andrew Conservative
In keeping with Barack Obamas administration position that pro-lifers are radical right wing extremists or Right wing domestic terrorists, Janet Napolitano is spending time investigating pro-lifers in Wisconsin instead of underwear bombers over Detroit!!!
This is pure insanity
Homeland Security improperly conducted a threat assessment of Wisconsin pro- and anti-abortion rights groups before an expected rally last year. The department said in a memo released last year that it destroyed or deleted all of the copies of the assessment after an internal review found it violated intelligence gathering guidelines about protest groups which posed no threat to homeland security.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeamerican.org ...
Or are they filled with ‘fellow travelers’
Here is the memo that Napolitano/DHS hurried to get out immediately after obama took office.....they dropped it like a hot potato.....I’m guessing that the current story is more redux of just what went on in earliest 2009
I thought destroying a government document after it had been generated was against the law. After all,the people paid for the information on that document. IF IT IS SO SENSITIVE, IT SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED SECRET BUT STILL NOT DESTROYED.
The nerve of these Chicago thugs, It ticks me off.
They are Federal Employees — America’s Haitians — you can’t have expectations of anything but misery, incompetence and failure from them, yet from you they expect large entitlements.
Apparently people who DON’t want to kill babies are terrorists to Janet ‘From Another Planet’ Napolitno
Destruction of the evidence was a coverup. Someone needs to spend some prison time over this.
I do not believe it was 'destroyed'.
Reclassified. Hidden under a different title.
But not destroyed.
First off, these people are professional liars. That is an established fact. What makes you think they wouldn't lie about destroying it?
What makes you think they did not keep it, and are still using it?
That is a laugh. While technically true, Homeland Security is involved (improperly) in a number of avenues that carry no threat to homeland security:
Big Media Meets Law Enforcement at White House; Biden Announces Focus on Intellectual Property Theft (BroadbandandBreakfast ^ | December 16th, 2009 | Andrew Feinberg and Eli Evans )
The U.S. is committed to an inter-agency process for combating piracy of American intellectual property, Vice President Joseph Biden said Tuesday during a press availability with top law enforcement officials.
Appearing at the White House complex with U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, the directors of the FBI, Customs and Border Protection, and the United States Secret Service, as well as the chief executives of the nations largest entertainment companies.
The meeting was followed by a closed-door, roundtable discussion on international intellectual property theft.
not surprising, since their first assessment under the 0bama administration listed the pro-life movement, and returning war veterans as possible “right wing terrorists or extremists.”
Pro-Life is dangerous to the Democrat agenda. Terrorists only endanger American lives. We know which is more important to the Obama administration, right?
Now I know why I call them Loony Liberal Leftists (L^3)!
Anyone who disagrees with a Leftists is considered an enemy of the state.
Not destroyed? You must be reading a different article than I did:
“The department said in a memo released last year that it destroyed or deleted all of the copies of the assessment after an internal review found it violated intelligence gathering guidelines about protest groups which posed no threat to homeland security.”
No, same article.
However, can you positively identify the person whose name is 'The Department'?
Can you hold that person accountable?
Do you think that a government agency would not LIE to you, or the media?
Do you think the media would purposefully print what they know to be a lie?
"THE DEPARTMENT" issued a memo to the media stating they 'destroyed' the document(s).
What gives you the slightest reason to even believe that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.