Skip to comments.Disturbed by Beck, O'Reilly and Breitbart
Posted on 02/11/2010 8:53:38 AM PST by Britt0n
On the issue of constitutional eligibility, we are embarrassed that these smart men, whom we admire, are either unwilling or too arrogant to look closely at these serious issues. Instead they attack others for having the audacity to ask questions questions they normally would ask if they had their facts correct.
We are big fans of Glenn Beck on Fox News; we DVR his show every day. We have been following the career of Andrew Breitbart since his news website began being linked by Matt Drudge years ago. Bill O'Reilly is an institution on Fox News, and we both have appeared on "The Factor." We appreciate the frank and lively discussions that usually grace his show.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Because you can question his policies but do not question his faith, nor for that matter his citizenship. You can’t state it any more plainly than that. O’Reilly, Beck and the rest are reached. Compromised.
Malcom X was the father of Obama via rape ritual set up by Frank Marshall Davis at the Bohemian Grove.
More than likely the reason for your disappointment in Rush, Hannity, O'Really and Beck is due to the fact that all of them have the sense to realize that if the Government of Kenya produced films of Obama's birth in a Mombassa hospital along with depositions from a dozen officials who attended the birth, it would make NO difference to his eligibility for the US Presidency.
Nobody in any branch of our Gov't is going to remove him under any circumstances. That's a given. We abandoned the Constitution long before he came along.
What is your answer to the announcements in the Hawaii newspapers? More importantly, what do you think the majority of the American electorate would say o a candidiate who espoused Birther claims, having been made aware of those ads?
This issue is a loser. Period.
Article, then #22 and #26.
#22 is a comment from someone who is not on The Ping List.
What if we cant survive until 2012 in the financial sense?Then what? Some things you just cant unscrew.
I think #22 repeats a theory that I was guilty of posting on a thread a while back from some obscure blog. I didn’t intend to imply that it was factual. I did think that it was at least amusing. And, considering the persons involved, at least remotely possible.
But until obama releases his actual records—assuming that they still exist somewhere and have not all been burned and shredded, we really don’t know who he is, who is father is, where he was born, or anything else.
I don’t see why those huge gaps in our knowledge should be simply ignored, or why he should be given a free pass to hide virtually his entire life from public view. Nor do I think that the DNC or the various Secretaries of State should have signed off on him until he offered some real proof of citizenship, let alone natural born citizenship.
It’s quite possible that our courts and congress will continue to shuffle off their responsibility to look into this matter, which has become like a huge black hole in our rule of law. Half the country now doubts whether Obama was properly qualified to be POTUS. This is not a healthy situation.
But in any case, I fail to see why insisting that he prove his bona fides is damaging to the conservative cause, or why it distracts from pursuing other courses of action. Anything that throws doubt on his legitimacy is worth pursuing, whether it is asking to see his records or simply making fun of his incredible incompetence and stupidity, or his willingness to lie at the drop of a hat, or his sick love of himself and himself alone.
That’s the spirit! Wave the white flag high, before the battle even begins!
It’s only “not good politics” as long as the news/talk etc guys refuse to touch it.
Once they cover it, it becomes useful politics. Breitbart, Rush etc are the ones making it “not good politics”.
All of this is true, Hennie Pennie. Nevertheless, a lot of people still watch what these people are doing. And saying and talking about.
I agree. For the record, I, too, would like to know what he’s hiding and why. But, I’ll have to defend Beck, Breitbart and O’Reilly in this matter. They don’t have any more proof than any of us do, so, why lose credibility over the issue? Having said that, to say that birthers are nuts and kooks is out of line as well.
The only people who know the truth are zero and his minions who are hiding things from the American public.
Someday, it will come to light and I h ope the sooner the better.
FREE THE BC!...
What’s the source on that?
Please take a look at the information at my blog, starting with http://www.butterdezillion.wordpress.com and then click on the link at the end of the post to get to the real meat of the evidence we’ve got. There’s MUCH that most people don’t know, and if they were aware of the criminal elements already documented they would realize that at least for some of us, this has little to do with Obama and everything in the world to do with having a nation that enforces the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.