Skip to comments.Disturbed by Beck, O'Reilly and Breitbart
Posted on 02/11/2010 8:53:38 AM PST by Britt0n
On the issue of constitutional eligibility, we are embarrassed that these smart men, whom we admire, are either unwilling or too arrogant to look closely at these serious issues. Instead they attack others for having the audacity to ask questions questions they normally would ask if they had their facts correct.
We are big fans of Glenn Beck on Fox News; we DVR his show every day. We have been following the career of Andrew Breitbart since his news website began being linked by Matt Drudge years ago. Bill O'Reilly is an institution on Fox News, and we both have appeared on "The Factor." We appreciate the frank and lively discussions that usually grace his show.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Where did you come up with that?
We have proof of a lot of foul play. See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
The jury is still out on the birth announcements in the papers. You’ll either hear more on that, or not. lol.
And you’re just going to hand over the keys to the nation without a fight?
As Theoden said in “Return of the King” when told that too few Rohanians had come to defeat Mordor - that they could not win. He said, “No, we cannot. But we will meet them in battle nonetheless.”
If wanting the laws enforced is a losing issue with the American people, then there is no hope for this country. I don’t think we’re there yet. I think our battle is to get the facts out so people know what the issue is really about. I think we have even worse than a usual time with that because the conservative talkers have also had the snot threatened out of them. Hannity and Beck have little kids they don’t want to lose. Those guys are like soldiers filmed saying they’re being treated well. What are their other options when they’ve got a gun pointed at their gut off-camera? See http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373
November 24, 1992 - Women's groups and Oregon Democrats yesterday called on the Senate ethics committee to investigate allegations from 10 women that Sen. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.) made unwelcome sexual advances to them. There also were calls for Packwood's resignation.
I really believe you have a point Grace. I’ve been terribley discouraged by both Beck and O’Reilly on the birth issue but on the other hand I also feel that they are under “some kind” of pressure. It doesn’t excuse the excoriating part but Beck, in particular is a really good man. He gets it. He’s on the money all the time and yet “this issue” is such a stickler. I feel like there is definitely something behind all of this. The owners of the networks have been threatened that they will be taken off the air if they mention this. This has GOT to be a GLOBALIST backed thing. It is something that even they cannot fight. Beck in particular wants to get his message out and if the network shuts down well...... there will be Keith Olberman and Chris (the spit machine) mathews. YUK. CO
It is certainly not pointless/ The TRUTH can never be pointless. There is an absolute reason why Obama continues to FIGHT to keep himself a BLANK SLATE. Since when has Wmerica ever elected a Blank Slate as their Commander in Chief??? This is totally unbelieveable. There is a whole lot more to this thing than folks want to admit. But it is America and her people that will have to decide, whether they are going to allow this abomination and usurpation of absolute power to go on or whether they will rise up and take back control. ALL branches of government are subject to the PEOPLE under that little document called “The Constitution”. Exercise it or be taken over and RULED. And ruled by tyrants. I guess the choice will be known before long. My American cousins and their families are going nuts. They want to rise up. But too many folk are depending on the mid-term elections and the ballot box. What a sorry mistake. Obama will create a crisis long before that. That election will likely never take place. Laugh if you want. But something BIG is going to happen. Perhaps they are rigging the election now or they are arranging legislation to change “election laws”. One way or another, Obama will NOT ALLOW HIS puppets to be reoved from office. Y’all will see. CO
I believe you fish hawk! The one thing I will say is that last year in Mexico I met a “couple” that were my sister and brother in laws friends from Oregon. They were like little children when the inauguaration took place. I was sickened. They would listen to nothing. They acted like they were celebrating the second coming. I couldn’t take it. I made my points known that’s for sure but they were in heaven. I hope they are rueing hat day now. If not, they soon will be. CO
I’m surprised at your reasoning penowa. I know you from another thread. You really are surprising me here. I thought you would react quite differently . CO
I agree. They aren’t going to remove him. It would be too chaotic, cause mass hysteria and make us look like complete and utter fools to the rest of the world. However, I think he will not run again and they won’t allow it if he does. That is when he will be exposed if he tries it.
It’s the O’bigmouth’s influence on Beck.
Andrew...he’s our next Andrew Sullivan. His girly hormones are out of wack when he has to deal with people in his circle he disagrees with - who are “beneath his wonderfulness”. Worse, his disagreement it toally emotional; not based on logic and fact from an honest study of the question.
What does it serve Beck and Andrew to berate and demonize a large portion of the base? Hormones or drugs for Andrew and for Beck it is the hope of riding on O’Dummy’s coattails at Fox, is all I can think of. He could be back on the booze...
Otherwise, wise men would just agree to disagree rather than acting like...Meghan McCain and Twinkletoes Graham.
“A way for commie libs to divide us.”
That makes Andrew and Beck commie libs who are doing their best to divide us. Anyone ever heard of the idea to agree to disagree? Andrew and Beck want to lead their own tiny bands cause they are special, you see.
Lucy, I believe that we allowed the MSM to “Alinsky” us on the BC issue. “Birther” reeks of a Time Magazine cover. We should have been all-inclusive of our demands on Obama....
1. Certified copy of original birth certificate
2. Columbia University transcripts
3. Columbia thesis paper
4. Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5. Harvard University transcripts
6. Illinois State Senate records
7. Illinois State Senate schedule
8. Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9. Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
10. Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11. Occidental College Transcripts
12. Parent’s marriage Certificate
13. Record of baptism
14. Selective Service registration records
15. Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16. Scholarly articles
Obama is far, far dirtier than just a birth certificate. He may indeed be a felon from fraud alone!
It's reality, unfortunately. We have NO elected officials who would stand up for our Constitution. Between the gov't schools brainwashing instead of educating, the lack of an honest press reporting nothing but propaganda for years, we have lost the Republic that so many have died for. Wish it were not so.
Unfortunately, once we abandoned the Constitution, years ago, we became a country, not of laws, but of men. Obama is a prime example of where that leads, and we have yet to reach the end of the road.
I had never seen the article that you linked. It doesn't surprise me in the least if it's fact. I think many were sufficiently warned before and shortly after he was sworn in what would happen to them and their families if they were not to get with the program. (Remember his visit to the SC?)
It remains to be seen if all of us who are awake and aware will quietly go down with the ship or fight back. If we do, it will have to be in ways other than with words broadcast on the radio or written on internet message boards.JMO
<-------------------------DU is thataway
DU is this away:
The transcript does not support your claim.....
The facts are not in your corner....
Birtherism hurts conservatism.
It all comes down to the Hawaii newspaper account of a birth. That’s what puts them all off the scent on the BO citizenship thing. Beck and O’Reilly have said as much. No one has cared to examine what other explanations there might be for a mistaken, falsified, or forged newspaper account of a birth.
Isn’t it possible that BO’s mother thought his life would be enhanced by a US birth (whether she was correct or not)? And, reported the birth in Hawaii to accomplish this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.