DUmmie FUnnies 04-12-10 (Impeachment back on DUmmies' table!)

DUmmie FUnnies ^ | April 12, 2010 | DUmmies and Charles Henrickson

[little jeremiah]

I love you like a brother!

Still laughing. Almost choked on my water.

Will read it again tomorrow.

It’s fine and beautiful how you eviscerate them so neatly.

[kevkrom]

wait for the justices in question to die quicker deaths – along the lines of John F. Kennedy, his brother Bobby, or Martin Luther King.

Despite the "fig leaf" of hypothetically assigning this as an "unlikely" read of Feingold's statement, this is clearly a case of this particular DUmmie's desire to inflict violence on those whose political views differ.

And as such, today's winner of the coveted Peace, Love, and Tolerance™ award.

[Budge]

They sound like they normally do.

Like the little communists they are.

[jla]

LOL - I’d love to sit amongst the congregation and listen to one of your homilies. (Do Lutherans use the term ‘homily’ or do they prefer ‘sermon’?).

[Arrowhead1952]

He didn’t specifically use the word “impeach” – But what else could he have meant. . . ?

[Maybe something like American Idol, where we call in and vote them off.]

Swinegold was just dreaming about something that will never happen.

---

Of course, impeachment of our public officials must not be taken lightly.

Still can't get over X - 42 being impeached.

---

The Bush v. Gore decision of December 2000, which mandated that the counting of votes for President cease, and thereby handed the 2000 Presidential election to George W. Bush . . .

[Bush, Bush, Bush!!! ARRRGGGGGHHHHHH!!!! OUR HEADS ARE ABOUT TO EXPLODE!!!!!!!]

BDS will continue for many years at the DUmp.

---

I understand you are angry, and this decision is very bad, but it in no way violates any law that I know of.

[LOUSY FREEPER TROLL!!!]

DUmmies always have problem when the truth is presented.

[rockrr]

All of us have hopes and aspirations to one degree or another, but what sick, twisted pathology would compel these DUmmies to set themselves up for repeated failure again and again?

They work themselves up to a fever-pitch over the goofiest of crap only to crash & burn. Then they find something else to obsess about......or like a broken record return to their last failure and try to “fix” it, certain that *this* time will be the charm.

Thanks Charles!

[Charles Henrickson]

I’d love to sit amongst the congregation and listen to one of your homilies.

I post all my sermons here on FR. (I even have a sermon ping list for that.) Do a search for "sermon," and you will find them. Also, you can find all my sermons at my church's website, stmatthewbt.org.

(Do Lutherans use the term ‘homily’ or do they prefer ‘sermon’?)

Usually we use "sermon," but sometimes "homily." "Homily" implies something a little shorter than a regular-length sermon (and maybe a little less formal).

[mikrofon]

Fascist 5

The DUmmies probably think of the remaining Justices much as the "Fantastic Four", who they hope will defend the world against the advance of right-wing hegemony and make the country safe for Progressivism.

In fact, let's make a comparison between this group and the comic characters (the F4, that is)-

Mister Fantastic: The soon-to-retire J.P. Stevens, "Liberal Lion" of the Court.
Human Torch: Stephen Breyer, never averse to setting fire to the Constitution when necessary.
Invisible Woman: Sonia Sotomayor- not much to see there, but the 'wise Latino' will undoubtedly come through.
The Thing: Well....

[nina0113]

Please try to hang in there till Election Night, or even a day or two after. Every time they lose, they lock out all but paid subscribers, and we NEED spies.

[Cyber Liberty]

There are a lot of FReeper Trolls today. Did they pass a hat for your supreme pizza? Peach ice cream? Are you pregnant?

[Ballygrl]

I’m not a paid subscriber though, no way would I give them a dime of my money.

[Charles Henrickson]

Since they're a DC-Comix production, I'd go with "Justice League":

[loboinok]

IF illegal corruption is clearly proven in a court of law and not blogs -absolutely agree

You let this one get by you. ;0)

[supercat]

I can understand why honest Supreme Court judges might feel a need to maintain civility, but I do sometimes wish that they would point out in dissents that the authority to "say what the law is" referred to in Marbury v. Madison does not imply that the law conforms to whatever they say. The Supreme Court is can only legitimately make decisions consistent with the Supreme Law of the Land. Any decisions contrary to the Supreme Law of the Land are illegitimate, and citizens have a right and duty to recognize them as such.

Incidentally, I'd also like to see a judge mention that judicial precedents don't even rank on the "supremacy" scale (with the Constitution, treaties, statutes, etc.). The only time it's worthwhile to consider precedent is when those other laws would be ambiguous. If the law would clearly require judges reach a particular decision, any precedent would either be redundant (if it supports the decision), inapplicable (if it doesn't fit quite the same situation as the current case) or illegitimate (if it would fit the current case, but disagrees with what the law requires).

[infidel29]

What the people need to do is protest in front of the SCOTUS day by day.

HA!!! LOUSY FREEPER TROLL!! We all know DUmmies use the abbreviation USSC (they seem to LOVE the USS... something) abbreviation.