Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Eyes Unclouded

I believe a question mark was inserted after ‘sabotage’; however, I can’t understand how you could reject the theory out-of-hand without contradictory evidence unless......


9 posted on 05/02/2010 2:37:31 PM PDT by IbJensen ((Ps 109.8): "Let his days be few; and let another take his position.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: IbJensen

It is not the North Koreans and here is why;
http://www.theusmat.com/ has links to FR contributions


12 posted on 05/02/2010 2:42:40 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (Corps vs Corpse? Why naturally, Obama was talking about the White House Press Corpse.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

I’m not ruling it out 100% because there hasn’t been proper analysis or recovery of wreckage. I can say it is many many times more likely to be an rare accident than any kind of sabotage or attack.

You know I wonder if Gore was president on 9/11 would FR have hosted truther threads?


13 posted on 05/02/2010 2:44:27 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded ("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

Sabotage is extremely unlikely. But I can understand how those that either have not worked offshore or thought too much about what all is involved could get carried away with speculation. This is dangerous stuff and it’s more likely that some sort of accident happened. But none of us know exactly what happened so nothing is off the table.


14 posted on 05/02/2010 2:45:34 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson