Skip to comments.US State Dept Confirms: Obama “NOT” a US Citizen Prior to & in 1968
Posted on 09/24/2010 11:31:46 AM PDT by patlin
proof positive that Obama was NOT a US citizen prior to & in 1968...Sept. 24, 2010
Dear Sen. Thune,
As a member of the Armed Forces Committee & member of the sub-committee on Personnel, I am imploring you to please take this seriously & take immediate action...
(Excerpt) Read more at constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com ...
Does Levin think Obama is legit?
Ahhhh, now that makes more sense. I was not aware that other docs were missing. Thanks for taking the time to explain.
He’ll never admit it! It’s all “POLITICS” to them even though they scream & cry about the destruction of our nation every day. It’s all “HYPE”. They are “NOT” true constitutional conservatives. They finally revealed their inner liberal leanings. You can not cry “FOUL” & then embrace only part of that which you claim to respect & cherish.
This is a document for the mother after Zero was born. A parent’s actions can’t strip a child of birthright citizenship. He may not be NBC for various reasons, but this doesn’t make him a non-citizen.
From the US State Department:
F. RENUNCIATION FOR MINOR CHILDREN
Parents cannot renounce U.S. citizenship on behalf of their minor children. Before an oath of renunciation will be administered under Section 349(a)(5) of the INA, a person under the age of eighteen must convince a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer that he/she fully understands the nature and consequences of the oath of renunciation, is not subject to duress or undue influence, and is voluntarily seeking to renounce his/her U.S. citizenship.
Thanks, I was just looking for that...
Imagine State=run media if this entire birther and citizenship issue were about G. W. — the media would be in a collective feeding frenzy right now!!
Thanks, I was just looking for that...
Why would Stanley renounce her son’s citizenship but not her own? It is possible that she considered him to have dual citizenship either Indonesian or Kenyan as well as US and that is why she crossed out his name.
When you consider all the Irish-Americans who applied for Irish citizenship and have not lost their US citizenship, or the immigrants who became US citizens and are still considered by their native lands to be citizens, or the children born here to immigrants (like the American born children of my French neigbors, who are French citizens according to France) - it is obvious that dual citizenship does not void US citizenship in practice.
When it comes to the presidency, maybe it is a different story. But I would not hold people liable for the decisions made in their behalf while they were children. If the French-American kid down the street wants to be president someday, let him renounce French citizenship. OTOH if his parents take him back to France, raise him as a French citizen, and he lives as a French citizen after the age of 18 - too bad for his presidential ambitions.
Just another lame argument coming from one who didn't even know the difference between "analogous" & "synonymous" in the WKA deciding opinion that has been misinterpreted for over a 100 yrs.
This whole issue could be resolved in a day IF obama wanted it resolved. He doesn’t. Why? who knows. Makes no sense, but it still is frustrating that all his records are sealed up and none of his media is even halfway curious about this guy.
Frightening part is that a precedent has been set to seat a President under a cloud of uncertainty of who he is or even if he is legally qualified to be President.
Citizen or not he still sucks.
Section 349 that James quoted in 26 was passed in 1952 as part of the McCarran-Walter Act.
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part III > § 1481
Prev | Next § 1481. Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions...How Current is This?
Updates to this section of the United States Code
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/HowCurrent.php/?tn=8&fragid=T08F00311&extid=usc_sec_08_00001481——000-&sourcedate=2010-05-12&proctime=Thu May 13 07:52:43 2010
Title 8 > Chapter 12 > Subchapter III > Part III > Section 1481
§ 1481. Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions
Title 8 of the US Code as currently published by the US Government reflects the laws passed by Congress as of Feb.1, 2010, and it is this version that is published here.
A parent cannot strip a child born in the U.S. of his U.S. citizenship. That birthright belongs to the child and not to the parent.
If Aristotle Onassis had adopted John and Caroline Kennedy, they would still have been U.S. citizens .... regardless of what Jackie and Aristotle did or did not do.
F. RENUNCIATION FOR MINOR CHILDREN Parents cannot renounce U.S. citizenship on behalf of their minor children. Before an oath of renunciation will be administered under Section 349(a)(5) of the INA, a person under the age of eighteen must convince a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer that he/she fully understands the nature and consequences of the oath of renunciation, is not subject to duress or undue influence, and is voluntarily seeking to renounce his/her U.S. citizenship.
Obama is hiding his original birth certificate because it probably lists his birth name as "Barry Dunham". Since Obama, Sr. was already married in Kenya and bigamy is illegal in the U.S., the birth certificate may have even listed Stanley Ann Dunham as "Single".
If Rush and Hannity are not barking up the "not a U.S. citizen" tree, they are pretty sure that it is the wrong tree.
IKE had to show/file his birth certificate.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.