Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Can America “Thrive” with a Liar and Fraudster in the Office of the Presidency?
The Post and Email Blog ^ | Jan. 13, 2011 | Comment Left by a Reader

Posted on 01/13/2011 10:16:28 AM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009

CBS News allowed the following comment to be published on its website, following an article about Obama’s visit to Arizona yesterday:

... Who were the doctor(s) and nurse(s) at Kapi`Olani that delivered Barack? My ex-wife worked at the hospital and I understand the records at Kapi’Olani are impeccable. Where are the foot prints? What public records exist that can even demonstrate that Mrs. Obama was even at Kapi’Olani on the day of Barack’s birth? Talk at Kapi`Olani, would have been unabashed, the city of Honolulu at the time very racist towards black people.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abercrombie; certifigate; eligibility; ineligibility; kapiolani; naturalborncitizen; noaccountability; nobirthcertificate; nodocumentation; nointegrity; obama; thrive
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 351-400401-450451-500 ... 851-882 next last
To: butterdezillion; Munz
I think that was the day some really bad thuggery happened.

And another day of January 14, 2009???

401 posted on 01/14/2011 1:33:42 AM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: melancholy; little jeremiah; azishot; LucyT; All
They “get it”, they are just on the other team.

I certainly see some similarities here with the FINOs acting like the Dung Head Media and other leftists actings since Saturday morning, hmmm???

402 posted on 01/14/2011 1:39:42 AM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT; Hotlanta Mike

Still trolling, that’s what all the TTTs stand for, or Trolling ‘N Trolling ‘N Trolling!!!

How you ever thought that the applications have some questions of intent to be answered???


403 posted on 01/14/2011 2:15:17 AM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: melancholy

LOL.

And there are over 200 million Americans who feel the same way.

I am truly tored of the continuing OBama campagn, taking advantage of every crisis, and trying to manipulate the hearts of America to his advantage.

Obama is one sicko politician. Got to get rid of him and his whole set of running dogs.


404 posted on 01/14/2011 2:24:23 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com2009/05/brack_obama_the _quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

He filled in his application in November and was approved by Soros last December and Jim let him in here to practice his masochism for a later zot!!!


405 posted on 01/14/2011 2:30:53 AM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

It’s my understanding that they could not get married in Hawaii as Hawaii did not allow state marriages for a biggamist. If so where did they get married? Could it be that the missing page of the public Hawaiian divorce papers contained not only mention of a child but also mention of a marriage in Kenya?


406 posted on 01/14/2011 2:43:23 AM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

It’s my understanding that they could not get married in Hawaii as Hawaii did not allow state marriages for a biggamist. If so where did they get married? Could it be that the missing page of the public Hawaiian divorce papers contained not only mention of a child but also mention of a marriage in Kenya?


407 posted on 01/14/2011 2:43:36 AM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I can and do agree with much you say.
Were we speaking of run of the mill “normal” events/people I am with ya.
But this is the president over whom much has been made of the circumstances surrounding his birth and birthplace.
I simply have observed enough people to know somewhere somehow someone would come forward to declare they were there and remember the event.
I am not a birther but I sure do have questions.
Its all the little pieces that add up to a big pile of smelliness which could be dispersed with the opening of his records.
Its pretty strange that we can find out just about anything we want about anyone we want except for El Zee-rho.
I just can’t get over that easily.


408 posted on 01/14/2011 3:08:09 AM PST by Adder (Part 1 Accomplished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT
it is not a record of where you traveled

The question isn't really where, but when. And that US Govt knows to a certain extent as they have a record of your reentries into the country. If Stanley Ann Dunham reentered the US on say Aug 7, 1961, that would pretty much prove that Barry was born outside the US.

ML/NJ

409 posted on 01/14/2011 4:26:30 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Adder

His step-grandma in Kenya said she was there and remembered the event, right before they shushed her up, told her the “right” answer, and then put police in front of her house to keep anybody from talking to her until the election was over.

That’s the only person I know of who claimed to be there. Some gal claimed that her recently-deceased father was the doctor who had mentioned it to her because of Stanley Ann’s name. But it turned out that her dad wasn’t even doctoring in 1961. Aside from that I don’t know of anybody who claimed to be there at his birth.

Fukino said she saw the (amended and thus legally nonvalid, which she didn’t mention) vital records swearing that Obama was born in Hawaii, so SOMEBODY swore to it (if Fukino wasn’t just flatly lying, which is a possibility). I suspect it was his other grandma - Madelyn Dunham. But because the record is legally invalid it doesn’t count for anything unless and until the BC is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body who then has to evaluate the probative value (based on the evidentiary standards their office requires).

I definitely agree that there is a big pile of smelliness regarding Obama’s records. I am a proud “birther” just as I am a proud “vexatious requestor”. Someday everybody will know how we’ve been deceived by government, media, law enforcement, and the courts, and I will write a country-western song saying, “I was a birther when being a birther wasn’t cool.” lol


410 posted on 01/14/2011 5:06:12 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT

Title 10 says that for combat orders the Sec Def must have the approval of the Commander in Chief. Title 10 is precisely the law which shows Judge Denise Lind to be wrong, wrong, wrong.

Another thing which shows Denise Lind to be wrong is that actual Authorization For the Use of Force which was passed after 9-11. It authorizes only “the President” to decide what force to use in the pursuit of terrorists and/or those who helped to perpetrate 9-11.

So you’ve got general law (Title 10) and SPECIFIC CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION which both say that the President authorizing the use of force is CRITICAL to the lawfulness of the orders.

What statute, then, is Denise Lind relying on to say the exact opposite of what these laws say? What statute did she cite?


411 posted on 01/14/2011 5:15:41 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Rush has mentioned the eligibility issue positively before. If he deliberately changed the subject there must be something else going on - maybe that he’s afraid of how the media might latch on to the subject. But since the screener didn’t screen out the caller it must not have been something he communicated to the screener.


412 posted on 01/14/2011 5:21:42 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Yep. That Scalia refused to be there for. Making him the only justice at the time who was NOT guilty of ex parte communications for several cases that went to conference in the next week or so.

And 2 days later, Rush (good friend to Justice Clarence Thomas, who DEFINITELY didn’t look happy at the inauguration) said that he hoped Obama would fail because Obama WANTS to destroy the country.

Six days later Justice Stevens called Joe Biden “Mr President” after swearing him in. The same day as Chief Justice Roberts botched up the oath in public by cutting in on Obama before he was done saying the last part of the first piece he was supposed to say.


413 posted on 01/14/2011 5:32:05 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: danamco; Red Steel

“He filled in his application in November and was approved by Soros last December and Jim let him in here to practice his masochism for a later zot!!!”

It’s got to be something like that. He makes not even the flimsiest attempt to impersonate a conservative. He’s completely open and above-board about who he is—and it ain’t one of us.

The upside of your explanation is the humor factor. I don’t know if you followed Red Steel’s description of Non-Sequitur’s zot. It was hilarious. I haven’t laughed that hard in a while. N-S flew narrowly below the radar for some time, and then, as RS inimically put it, was “lured” onto a zot thread. An actual zot thread. What an image. Can’t you just picture it?

Here little troll; here trollie trollie.
Come and play on this nice, fun thread.
It’s totally safe; there’s no danger (snicker snicker) at all.

Non-Sequitur: Well, if you’re SURE there’s no danger, then why not?

zot.


414 posted on 01/14/2011 8:16:30 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

She cited the “embarrassment” statute. She didn’t want to make Obama look bad. [/s on the first part, not on the second.]


415 posted on 01/14/2011 8:42:18 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

“Obama is one sicko politician.”

Isn’t that the truth. His own closest friends and advisers have inadvertently admitted this. They uniformly affirm, in so many words, that Obama, “Thinks he is the smartest person in any room”.

A lot of people see this as just a big ego. It is far, far more and worse than that. When any person, but most especially a person wholly devoid of accomplishments [other than affirmative-actioning his way into multiple colleges, and lying and cheating his way to multiple election victories] actually believes they are the smartest person alive, it is a psychotic pathology.

Iow, it is a total break from reality. It is so far from reality as to posit a permanent residence in lala-land. ‘Sicko’ is pretty much the mildest way to express it. This guy is psycho. Yes; he must be removed. Peacefully and legally, but he MUST be removed.


416 posted on 01/14/2011 8:57:25 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: danamco

“Still trolling, that’s what all the TTTs stand for, or Trolling ‘N Trolling ‘N Trolling!!!”

It finally, actually happened to me. First time. I had just taken a big sip of really delicious Red Rose hot tea, and then I read your comment. I had a mouthful of tea and a huge, unstoppable laugh. I’ve never been so close to having it spew out my nose. It was awful—but your humorous comment made it all so very worthwhile. Thanks!


417 posted on 01/14/2011 9:03:47 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I just read your reply and first I want to thank you for going into such detail. Certainly there are points that need to be clarified and looked into but it fits.

It brings to mind a few questions though and I wonder if anyone has the answers.

Lets just suppose that all of your theory is correct. That would put the same people in charge of the next election pretty much, as they can still manipulate the same institutions. Media and Politics. They will just prop another stooge in place of Obama if they are done with him, or him again. Correct?

My other question is where does Palin fit in on all of this? I mean she must have known about McCains involvement, she still talks well of him today (which really bothers me)so if she were the pick to run, she would be doomed from the start right?

Does it not seem strange that someone like GW, who was so heavily tied with the CIA, couldn’t have the one person who was pulling his strings “fixed”. I would think that someone who threatened the collapse of the entire country would certainly be a viable target. No questions asked.

How can this cycle be broken? Is the TEA party strong enough? Why hasn’t the MSM like FOX turned upon us? If he can control them to keep off the birth certificate (certainly someone has) why hasn’t he pulled the same on the TEA party - MSLSD and the rest sure jumped on that band wagon. But Fox has really kept strong with us. Not letting us be painted as nuts like the rest.

Just thoughts in my mind.

Thanks again for the very succinct reply. It is worth thinking about for sure and greatly appreciated


418 posted on 01/14/2011 9:48:50 AM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Hey miss jamese, haven’t we just heard this same of your talking point from someone else recently, hmmmm???
“I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth.


Say what? I see from the above that English isn’t your first language. Are you an illegal alien, Mr. Dana?


419 posted on 01/14/2011 9:58:33 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: Munz

Good questions.

As long as our economy allows us to be taken hostage we can expect to be locked in this same pattern, regardless of who we elect. The House can defund a lot of stuff to try to get us on more stable financial ground, and whether they will or won’t may depend on whether Soros risks having more people know in order to silence the freshmen. It will be very interesting to see what happens. I hope I’m wrong and the freshmen effect real change which will put us on more stable ground.

I don’t think that Palin would have to know about all this. She’s said since the election that she doesn’t think McCain did enough in this regard. I think that while she was running as his VP she just did what he told her to do, and he didn’t tell her why she had to shut up about it.

I think the way that Soros did the run on the bank means that just bumping him off wouldn’t fix anything. He has hedge fund managers who work with him, as I understand it. Sort of a little army at his own command. And his allegiance with the Islamists in order to defeat capitalism, as David Horowitz has documented, also gives an army that is well able to do his bidding even if he was taken out. As I understand it, Soros’ son is also like-minded with him and would carry the torch if something happened to his dad.

So it’s a many-headed beast and the only real defense against it is for our economy to not play so near the edge of the chasm. The Cloward-Piven Plan is all about how to get us so near the edge that we can easily either fall or be pushed over the cliff and defeat capitalism. The dems have been pushing policy that puts us on the edge for a very long time, and now we’re seeing just how deadly serious they were all along, while we were ignoring it and playing politics.

Fox is gradually becoming more and more like the other “news” outlets. And Beck and O’Reilly have been very vocal in calling “birthers” nuts, although it’s been toning down as they realize that it’s not just a fringe group that has concerns.

I think Soros figures he can let us talk to our hearts’ content as long as we stay away from his jugular. That’s why of all the stuff Soros could have threatened the media heads on, he threatened them with annihilation if they addressed the eligibility issue. That is his jugular.

I believe Soros has held off the judiciary with his threats, but judging by the non-recusal of Sotomayor and Kagan in the Kerchner suit, I agree with Kerchner that there are probably 3 SCOTUS justices who would still take on the eligibility issue. The effect that the Tea Party can have is to try to influence one more conservative justice - or more probably, the Chief Justice.

The issue the judges face is how America could survive what Soros might do in retaliation. It’s a tough question.

If that’s not the question they face then they are just plain two-timing pansies who aren’t worth their salt (which is an alternate theory that could be the reality as well).

The other thing the Tea Party can do is try to pass state eligibility laws, such as I suggest at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2656925/posts (a new post that I posted today). Obama would not run if this bill was passed, because the documentation requirement would remain in effect even when the constitutionality of the rest of it is challenged, and the embedded transaction logs on both his passport and on any fake BC that Abercrombie might have come up with recently would reveal way too much, including the lawlessness in the bureaucracies and the people who knew about the lawlessness. It would blow up in the media’s face as well as Pelosi’s and a lot of other politicians.

His not running would cause more people to ask questions about why, and with the popular sentiment strongly against the lawlessness he may realize he can’t pull this all off right now.

I need to think it through more also. I wish I could figure out what that book was that somebody wrote about how to make economic terrorism nearly impossible. If more information is revealed to the public about the lawlessness that has gone on we may be able to get Congress-critters to seriously consider how to get out of this mess and maybe something can be done. It might have to wait until after 2012 since we don’t have veto override power. Or, maybe if enough blue dog dems are able to see the treason going on, they will side with the US rather than with Soros. Hard to say.

Definitely interesting times.


420 posted on 01/14/2011 10:19:47 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Munz

I am answering your Boehner post on this thread because (1) the other thread is dead, and (2) I spoke to one of your main points on this thread, in my post 391.

To elaborate, no, decidedly no; I do not think the MSM could have smeared Boehner if he’d cited Abercrombie’s statement. Rather, if Boehner had referenced Neil’s remarks re: the BC issue—and if he had done so without showing fear [not sure that would have been possible for him] the MSM could not have laid a glove on him. That was exactly the beauty of the set up. When Obama’s close friend and fellow commie affirms that more info needs to be released, the MSM *cannot* blame Boehner for reinforcing that foregone conclusion. All it takes is a modicum of media savvy and a bare smidgen of courage.

It also requires a commitment to the integrity of the Constitution. Draw your own conclusions.

As for wanting a “fighter”; no, that’s not even close to the issue. It is not conservative pols who run around relentlessly shouting they’re going to ‘fight’ for us. It’s Dems, and they don’t mean they’re going to fight the terrorists, or fight to open more energy resources on our own soil. They mean they’re going to fight fellow Americans who call themselves conservatives.

When conservatives speak of ‘fighters’ - we prefer the term ‘warriors’ - we’re talking about the soldiers on the front lines in Afghanistan and similar situations. These are the heroes fighting impossible odds due to Rules of Engagement that ensure they cannot protect themselves. What has Boehner done about this, I wonder? [Would the MSM paint him as a kook if he moved quickly to stem the massacre of young American soldiers? Is that the problem?]

No, I don’t want a ‘fighter’. I just want a Speaker who is smart enough and conservative enough to take advantage of the unique gift Ambercrombie delivered on a gigantic silver platter. As mentioned above, it only requires two things: a teensy weensy bit of savvy, and a rare, selfless moment when a pint-sized dash of courage overcomes the omnipresent political calculation long enough to let a man be a man, and speak up for the people who handed him his majority. It’s not too much to ask.

Thanks for the link you sent. I checked it out, but was unable to make the relevant connection. I wasn’t being purposefully dense; it just didn’t seem to bear on the issue at hand. I leave open the possibility that I somehow overlooked the significance altogether.


421 posted on 01/14/2011 10:46:01 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Say what? I see from the above that English isn’t your first language. Are you an illegal alien, Mr. Dana?

Nice way to deflect your constantly lies, and by your own admission we certainly know you are a PAID enabler, aka FINO, trying to keep your dear Fuehrer in office at any cost, nothing new here. You are in the same traitorous class as former NS and Drew, miss!

Illegal alien, miss? No, I'm certainly a more American patriot than you, miss. And am in possession of a "LEGAL" form N550 after pledging an oath to the Constitution, which you probably never have, miss!!

English is actually my fourth language, miss!!!

Just wonder how many language do you speak, miss???

422 posted on 01/14/2011 12:00:52 PM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
The same day as Chief Justice Roberts botched up the oath in public by cutting in on Obama before he was done saying the last part of the first piece he was supposed to say.

During his confirmation hearing, Roberts was touted as the most intelligent judge as a judge to USSC, that nobody had seen before, and he passed every questions with flying color better than anyone before him without hesitation!

Now nobody is going to tell me that he botched the oath, if it was NOT for the very seriousness that he knew/know the usurper was NOT legal eligible to march into the W.H., and when at the same time looking directly in the eyes of the devil himself and being himself (Roberts) an enabler to the biggest scam and crime being presented to the American people by this Constitutional crisis!!

This having the meeting at SCOTUS January 14, 2009 in mind, which we don't know what transpired there!!!

Hasn't it been reported that the second due-over oath (without a Bible) also had some problems???

423 posted on 01/14/2011 12:25:30 PM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
You are welcome, but I believe it's the "Gospel" truth, LOL!

I was there when NS was escorted out!!

Immediately thereafter Drew asked for and Jim escorted him nicely to the door with one or two words!!!

IIRC there was also a third zot???

424 posted on 01/14/2011 12:34:38 PM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: danamco

The other thing that is very curious is the timing of when Roberts invited Obama for the meeting - an unprecedented event that had never been done for ANY POTUS before taking office, much less one with lawsuits coming before SCOTUS, and even much much less the invitation coming from the chief justice who knew there would be cases before SCOTUS at the time the meeting took place.

IOW, Roberts in an unprecedented move specifically invited Obama for what Roberts knew would be an unethical ex parte communication.

And he did it on the exact same day as the first eligibility case came before SCOTUS. The day on which Roberts knew what the court had decided but the public hadn’t yet been notified. Roberts made sure not only that he invited Obama, but that the public got the news of the invitation before they knew what SCOTUS had decided on the Donofrio case. If I didn’t know better (cough), I’d almost say that was a deliberate attempt to make the invitation look as fishy as possible to as many people as possible. On the first day that SCOTUS actually had to decide something about Obama’s eligibility.

This was after the whole big mess with SCOTUS clerk Danny Bickel, where lots of people like myself wrote to SCOTUS to tell them there was funny business going on. Roberts probably knew there were already red flags raised by others and it sure looks to me that he made sure to raise some of his own in answer to those already raised.


425 posted on 01/14/2011 12:41:00 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: danamco

I hadn’t heard about any problems with the 2nd oath. I know that it was not videotaped, just audiotaped. I wonder why that was.

Does anybody know about the admissibility or standards for audiotaped evidence? Is it any different than the standards for videotaped evidence?

Had you heard something different?


426 posted on 01/14/2011 12:47:14 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Rush has mentioned the eligibility issue positively before.

Yes before they ALL - the three other branches was slapped with (Soros'?) the "unspeakable" NBC issue of silence threat!!

I have heard couple times when somebody past Mr. Snerdly or others, bringing up the NBC issue!!

Rush would hit the "panic" bottom, first scolding them and immediately change the subject. Very very obviously and the same on our local host, Todd Schnitt coming on after Rush at 3 PM!!!

Isn't it very obviously when ALL the blond FAUX gals and guys don't want to touch this issue with a ten foot pole and instead become very vicious IF it brought to the surface. Very very and extremely suspicious???

427 posted on 01/14/2011 12:52:35 PM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Nice way to deflect your constantly lies, and by your own admission we certainly know you are a PAID enabler, aka FINO, trying to keep your dear Fuehrer in office at any cost, nothing new here. You are in the same traitorous class as former NS and Drew, miss!

Illegal alien, miss? No, I’m certainly a more American patriot than you, miss. And am in possession of a “LEGAL” form N550 after pledging an oath to the Constitution, which you probably never have, miss!!

English is actually my fourth language, miss!!!

Just wonder how many language do you speak, miss???


Ah, English is your FOURTH language. That explains it!


428 posted on 01/14/2011 12:54:24 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
You are the one who continues to lie about Levin, and then you and your buddy Red Steel lie about what he said on a later show, and refuse to apologize. You talk about false quotes, LOL, you and your buddies need to look in the mirror.

Regarding Lakin, He intentionally disobeyed a lawful order from his CO, a Medal of Honor winner. He refused to deploy to a war zone in Afghanistan. When you are ordered to deploy, you better be on the ship, instead of pulling some birther stunt. And to top it off he has been on the internet using his stupid stunt for the past 9 months raising money for himself and his birther lawyer. I am sure there have been scores of gullible birthers who have sent this charlatan money. I am sure the owner of this site agrees with me regarding lakin's stunt.

429 posted on 01/14/2011 2:14:48 PM PST by TNTNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT

I came close to doing your two pings for you. Yes, two; one to the Big Guy whose site you are subverting, and one to Mark Levin. Then I thought I would give you one last chance to man-up and do it yourself. Here’s the issue: do the right thing:

Okay, TNTNT, let’s see to what use you are putting FR.

You used it to lie about Mark Levin. When called on it, you continued to lie about him. Do you think this site was created to give you a platform by which to smear Mark Levin? You certainly treat it that way. [If you dispute this, then post the full quote you attributed to Mark Levin, and ping him to it. Give him a chance to confirm or deny if. If you can’t or won’t do this, it confirms the fact you have been smearing him with a lie—which has been evident for some time now.]

You used the false ‘quote’ (or at least one word of it) to mock many good conservatives. You also left in the mind of many of these the idea that Mark Levin had called them ‘crackpots’. [Many who read your initial, lying post, no doubt left the thread before you were called on it. So they now believe a conservative icon called them ‘crackpots’.] Good job, TNTNT; you have taken FR and used it as a platform to smear conservatives via one of the most honorable and respected names in Constitutional Law.

The only problem being, this may not be the use the owner of this site wants you to make of it. Best to check with the appropriate party, and make sure your activities are in keeping with the intended purpose of this site.

You used this site to mock LTC Lakin. Do you think this site was set up to give you a platform from which to mock an honorable man? What gives you that idea? Have you checked with management, and alerted all concerned that you are using FR to mock LTC Lakin? Perhaps you should do so, and find out if that is the purpose of FR.

I will await the results. From what I understand, FR is not intended as a place to demean and lie about conservatives, or to mock and ridicule them. Maybe I am mistaken. I will wait and see how management and Mark Levin respond to your inquiries, and draw my own conclusions.

[Your willingness to follow through goes to your credibilty and integrity. If you refuse to take these simple and reasonable steps, then your credibility is zero, and you have a lot to answer for.]


430 posted on 01/14/2011 2:33:30 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Four languages! That is very impressive.

As to zots, I only read about them. I have yet to see a troll get ozoned in real time. I would like to see it, though.

Perhaps one of our current batch of Obamabots would like to volunteer? It’s very easy—along the lines of AA:

‘Hello, my name is [Freeper handle], and I am an anti-conservative troll. I believe everything Obama tells me, and I hope he wins in 2012.’

The rest, as they say, will take care of itself.


431 posted on 01/14/2011 2:41:51 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT

What statute says that valid authorization from a Commander in Chief is “irrelevant” to the lawfulness of combat deployment orders? It’s not Title Ten and it’s not the Authorization for the Use of Force. What did Judge Lind cite as the statutory basis for her saying that?

What law or rule forbids a brigade commander from issuing combat deployment orders to Iran this very second?


432 posted on 01/14/2011 2:52:08 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: jamese777; danamco
That explains it!

Explains what, Schmuck?

I see no problems with what poster danamco has said.

ML/NJ

433 posted on 01/14/2011 3:42:27 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Obama is one sicko politician.

I always thought it was "0bama" not "Obama". ;-)
434 posted on 01/14/2011 6:15:01 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT
Your passport records do NOT show where you have traveled.

Really? Why do the passport records show Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro in Indonesia?
435 posted on 01/14/2011 6:18:08 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

0bama vs Obama - now that is funny! I think I will opt for the former spelling in the future.


436 posted on 01/14/2011 6:21:31 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
I see no problems with what poster danamco has said.

Thank you, the trolling multiple language expert, miss jamese, as you know is an admitting paid Soros(?) hireling who also is posting on some questionable leftist forums!

After her buddies NS/Drew were "kindly" escorted out of the premises by Jim, she allied herself with a new FINO!!

Trolling 'N Trolling 'N Trolling = TNTNT!!!

437 posted on 01/14/2011 10:16:01 PM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

In any upper case, its the story of “O”, LOL.

I mean how silly can it get? I enjoy watching all of his leg tingled followers have Obasms, while being mind raped.
Fodder for ultimate ridicule.

The funny things are not really much of a joke. The right is castigated with having acurate effective debate, having truthfully scored deeply, and it is labelled vitriolic, while the left gets off with saying their vitriol is mere Obapassion. Again the story of “O.”

And last night we were treated to a show of Obamemorial in Tucson, when the tragic death rememberance became just another Obapit stop on the campaign trail. Another story of “O”.

Well I am getting ahead of this game. All of the Oba-effers can just go and Oba-eff themselves. Vitriol be damned and full speed ahead. Oba-unity is nothing but lockstep statism.
I will take good old red blooded American vitriolic debate over Oba-unity from this Liar and Fraud pretend Oba-president at ALL times, and bear no apology for it.Take it to the Oba-bank, if there are any left in a few years, that have not come here from Zimbabwe.

The Story of “O” indeed. LOL.


438 posted on 01/14/2011 10:50:49 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com2009/05/brack_obama_the _quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Photos posted January 15, 2009!!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2165181/posts


439 posted on 01/14/2011 10:51:11 PM PST by danamco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

I just want a Speaker who is smart enough and conservative enough to take advantage of the unique gift Ambercrombie delivered on a gigantic silver platter.


It’s true. The Speaker threw away a great, free, rare, opportunity.


440 posted on 01/15/2011 5:33:00 AM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

And last night we were treated to a show of Obamemorial in Tucson, when the tragic death rememberance became just another Obapit stop on the campaign trail. Another story of “O”.


Obama being compared to Ted Haggard...

“Rev. Obama’s Revival Meeting”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/01/rev_obamas_revival_meeting.html


441 posted on 01/15/2011 6:22:37 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Photos posted January 15, 2009!!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2165181/posts


This article is temporarily offline.


442 posted on 01/15/2011 6:23:40 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

And - those conservatives who have courage - if they speak up and speak out, and act on their convictions, will destroy the power of the MSM/leftist mafia. The MSM/leftist mafia have power because conservatives have abdicated. Conservatives (what to speak of RINOs) acting like scared little neutered bunny rabbits has emboldened the left. If one conservative speaks out, as you mentioned, they will do everything in their power to destroy that person.

But how about if 10 speak out? Or 20? Or 50? Or 100? All the way from State representatives and senators to governors, to Congress. Anyone who has a soap box. Mostly they’re scared, neutered, giving in - cowards!

I look forward to see what the newly elected Rs in the House will do and say. I hope they have the courage of their convictions.

It’s the cowards’ faults as much as it is the leftist slimes’ faults.


Well worth repeating.


443 posted on 01/15/2011 6:34:29 AM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Thanks Mike, that made a good read. And the comments to the article were also very worth while, most of America was not foled by this bogus memorial service. I feel so sorry for the families of the victims, and Jan Brewer, all who had to sit through this vile nonsense.

This is the kind of thing that gets people fighting mad.No good will come of it, unless it is to turf this demagogue for good.


444 posted on 01/15/2011 6:54:55 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com2009/05/brack_obama_the _quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

‘I just want a Speaker who is smart enough and conservative enough to take advantage of the unique gift Ambercrombie delivered on a gigantic silver platter.’

“It’s true. The Speaker threw away a great, free, rare, opportunity.”

I’m glad at least one other person gets it. I’m so tired of hearing what the MSM would have done to poor Boehner if he’d taken even a modest stand. No; he’d have been bullet-proof. All he had to say—and it was so simple and so obvious—is that he supported Abercrombie’s commitment to release more info. No more complicated than that. The MSM would have been over a barrel. They couldn’t attack Boehner without attacking Obama’s bff commie-gov. That in turn would have made Obama look bad—very bad—so it was not on the table.

How is this so hard to understand? If Boehner cared about the people who made Nov. happen—and who therefore put the gavel back in his hand—he could have done that much at least.


445 posted on 01/15/2011 8:57:52 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
Here's a novel thought for the birther crowd, what if Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner actually believes what he said about Obama being being born in Hawaii? OMG, that makes him an Obamabot!!!
446 posted on 01/15/2011 9:22:40 AM PST by TNTNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT

From another thread:

“Here’s what I don’t get. The Obot trolls on FR behave exactly like the MSM. They attack every scrap of information that’s harmful to Obama; they never speak one word in defense of conservatism, and they NEVER speak a word against Obama. Why are they tolerated? I thought that’s what the ‘zot’ was for? What am I missing here? It is a sincere question; I hope somebody has the answer.”


447 posted on 01/15/2011 9:24:20 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT

Only an Obama-loving conservatism-hating flaming-liberal would post what you just posted. You’ve outed yourself a hundred different ways. Unless the basic character and purpose of FR has changed—and I don’t think it has—your zot is coming.


448 posted on 01/15/2011 9:29:03 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

No, I am a proud Ronald Reagan Conservative, not a birtherbot!!


449 posted on 01/15/2011 9:31:15 AM PST by TNTNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: TNTNT

Repost, with a link, the three most conservative posts you’ve made on FR, along with the three most negative posts re: Obama.


450 posted on 01/15/2011 9:35:51 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 351-400401-450451-500 ... 851-882 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson