Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/05/2011 7:51:37 PM PDT by Triton42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Triton42

another question... of those in tonight’s debate; whose webpage would accept the smallest credit card donation?

Whose “minimum donation” is the most thought out?
hint... it is $20.12
LOVE IT!!!

Which ones don’t want Donations of less than $35?


57 posted on 05/05/2011 8:19:41 PM PDT by PizzaDriver ( on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

Shannon Bream. Herman came in second.


61 posted on 05/05/2011 8:20:52 PM PDT by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42
It is all rhetoric.
63 posted on 05/05/2011 8:23:00 PM PDT by verity (The Obama Administration is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42
Herman Cain. He has experience as a CEO, has been responsible and accountable for meeting payrolls, thinks on his feet, is devoted to the founding principles underlying our Declaration of Independence and Constitution, and is the only candidate among those on the current lists who would expose and demolish the Democratic contender in a debate. He could do that while, at the same time, making the predictable charges of "racism" by the "progressives" appear to be what they are--racist.
66 posted on 05/05/2011 8:25:19 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

I called BS on FOX and Shannon for saying Ron Paul was the father of the TEA party..

That would Be rick Santelli as far as I’m concerned.


69 posted on 05/05/2011 8:31:13 PM PDT by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42
I thought they all did well. It's refreshing to hear a more conservative voice coming off the tube.

I think I agree most with what Ron Paul says. He's better informed than most, and has courage and integrity. He appeared a little old and frail and stumbled in his closing but I think he has more depth than any of the others.

Rick Santorum held up his end nicely. He was solid and consistent throughout.

I thought Johnson a little strange at first but he sort of grew on me.

Pawlenty was okay, but I found him forgetable.

I don't get the Herman Cain thing. Maybe it's because I'm a racist.

Of the five, the only one I would care to see as president is Ron Paul. But overall, a refreshing night.

74 posted on 05/05/2011 8:33:30 PM PDT by Do Be (The heart is smarter than the head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

1. Johnson might as well go home.
2. I think Cain gets kudos because he seems so personally affable.


82 posted on 05/05/2011 8:45:21 PM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

Herman Cain hands down. Ron Paul is however, starting to grow on me.


85 posted on 05/05/2011 8:53:45 PM PDT by Lucky2 ( NObama - Done in One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

Herman Cain is undoubtly the best Republican Tea Party (non GOP) canidate we have. We would be most fortunate to have him as our President. He would destroy Obama in an election. GO CAIN!!!


86 posted on 05/05/2011 8:54:18 PM PDT by rwoodward ("god, guns and more ammo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42
Free Republic conservatives and teapartiers are the Big Losers.

-Cain will soak up a bunch of support from grassroots populist conservatives. -Santorum getting enough attention from pro-lifers. -Paul gets his populist following. None of the 3 will be nominated.

All of this will detract from the ability to get support for the serious conservative contenders. The GOP establishment will not split into 5 candidates ... they will quickly unite behind one, maybe 2, candidates.

RINOs win, we lose.



Regardless, I am off to NH mountains to fight Daniels & Romney.
88 posted on 05/05/2011 8:56:50 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Palin '12 begins in '11. In western New Hampshire pour moi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

Santorum—because he absolutely knocked the Mitch Daniels question out of the park.


89 posted on 05/05/2011 8:57:20 PM PDT by Antoninus (Hey Obama--Nice job taking out Osama. We're still going to run you out of DC in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42
HERMAN CAIN

92 posted on 05/05/2011 9:01:43 PM PDT by Savage Beast (Truth is the first casualty of American journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

I like Ron Paul for consistantcy, I disagree with some of his take on foreign policy. Economic policy he is a home run hitter, the Government needs to be decreased by 1/2 and our Defense budget can’t stay it’s current size either or this country is sunk. Now that Bin Laden is dead a big objective of the last decade is complete. Iraq and Afghanistan must stand on their own now, the boogieman is gone. Gary Johnson says bring the troops home now, and I think we can move in that direction now. We have to fund the defense of this country not all our allies as well that is their job to do.

We will hit the debt ceiling next week and Reagan was right on Peace through Strength in the Cold War, but the Soviets were financing a lot of our debt and making our products. The Chinese are much smarter and better at Economics than the Russians ever were.


94 posted on 05/05/2011 9:04:17 PM PDT by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42
Pawlenty and Cain did the best overall.

Johnson was thoughtful but uninspiring.

Paul gave his routine answers and remains a kook.

Santorum came in a loser for the Senate, but wanted people to think he was a winner. Instead he came across pompous and sanctimonious.

97 posted on 05/05/2011 9:08:36 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42
Obama won.

Any "Republican" debate with Santorum is full of crap.
100 posted on 05/05/2011 9:10:00 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

I’d stand in the rain
for Herman Cain!


103 posted on 05/05/2011 9:10:25 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

Herman Cain won hands down. Very articulate and true-blue conservative.


128 posted on 05/05/2011 9:47:17 PM PDT by Huddled Masses ("There you go again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42

Ron Paul is someone who, out of respect for his stature, depth of integrity and value, and wisdom, is sort of like the Rabbi in the room, where you walk into the room of family, neighbors, friends, and even if you cannot totally agree with him, when he speaks, you stop and you don’t say anything. You listen. You then contemplate what he had said. You certainly don’t argue with him, in that first off you cannot go one on one with him anyway and besides you sort of have this gut that he is right anyway even if you are not going to do what he said.

So that is what Ron Paul is to me. I don’t agree with, for example, his stand on legalization of drugs – yet I listen with total respect to what he has to say, and I consider that I may be wrong on the issue. But, the problem, to me, with his candidacy is that, even if he were to win the Presidency, he represents a deep, and foundational, principle of human politics that could only succeed if his ENTIRE package is implemented, and not piece meal. That is the problem. It would be a grand, historical, success beyond our wildest dreams for not only our nation, and the world, but it would only be successful if it were fully implemented, that liberty as he represents was entirely implemented according to the principles he stands for. And, unfortunately, I believe what would happen is only bits here and there would be implemented – for example legalization of drugs – but not the entire program, the entire package of liberty ... and thus it would fail. I am sorry. I respect him so much. I could only wish that he would become President and that the Congress and the nation would understand and fully engage his agenda of freedom, but I think it would not.

Of course I respect, and will continue and always respect him. I will listen and not argue (with him). I will take time to think about what he has to say. But I think that is the best I can do at this time in regards to his candidacy, because like it or not, I guess I am a life-long Republican. And perhaps not a total libertarian, and in my own shame perhaps really do not mean totally what I say when I say I support liberty.

Of the remaining candidates, they were all very, very impressive. As a Republican, I am proud of their affiliation with the Republican Party. I suppose when I am dead, they will say, here is Brian, he’s dead. He was a Republican.

I suppose it would be better if they were to say, he was an American. But, in reality, what they are probably going to say is, he was a husband, and a Republican.

I think I have less respect at this juncture for those who did not show up to the debate. It is not true that this was about South Carolina. No. The audience was all of America, and certainly all Republicans. It would not have mattered if it were in Greenville or Los Angeles. I would not have mattered to me. I wanted to see them all.

Of those who came, I really liked what businessman Herman Cain and Rick Santorum had to say, and their demeanor and presence. But having said that I was impressed with their message, what I was also thinking was, “Which of these can defeat Obama?”....

My conclusion is that Herman Cain can defeat Obama. He take him on one on one, both in stature, message, presence, delivery. And watching Santorum, I believe he can also defeat Obama.

To me, this is also important.

So at this juncture, I am supporting these two. Cain, whom I knew nothing before tonight, and Santorum, whom I have known for some time.


134 posted on 05/05/2011 9:57:55 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Triton42
Herman Cain was powerful, I would vote for him.

Can't figure how Johnson thinks he has a shot at anything, save your money.

146 posted on 05/05/2011 11:55:16 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; Triton42
For reference Republican Presidential Debate #1 - May 5, 2011 - Greenville, South Carolina (Live Thread)
154 posted on 05/06/2011 2:13:30 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Stay focused: Debt, Deficits & Immigration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson