Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FN Contributor Maj Gen Vallely: Ret CIA Agents Look At Obama's Birth Certificate, Say it's a Fraud
obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ^ | 06/14/2011 | ObamaRelease YourRecords

Posted on 06/14/2011 6:00:44 PM PDT by rxsid

"Fox News Contributor Major General Paul Vallely: Retired CIA Agents I've Had Look At Obama's Birth Certificate Say It Is Fraudulent

Video: Fox News Contributor Major General Paul Vallely: I've had retired CIA Agents and Investigators look at Obama's birth certificate and 10 out of 10 say it is fraudulent. The interview aired on the Terry Lakin Action Fund radio show 6/13/2011.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTMv2XAUHP4&feature=player_embedded"

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/fox-news-contributor-major-general-paul.html


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: americanpatriot; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; generalpaulevallely; generalpaulvallely; honorablepatriot; lakin; naturalborncitizen; obama; patriot4america; paulevallely; paulvallely; rarepatriot; terrylakin; vallely
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: STARWISE

Veddy in-terrrr-est-ink!...and probably very plausible!

21 posted on 06/14/2011 7:36:09 PM PDT by LUV W (RUN SARAH...R U N!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

;)

We just keep praying for our dear country and precious troops. When he mentions there are active and retired military who know ... that takes it to another level of
critical mass.


22 posted on 06/14/2011 7:44:19 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If you missed Gen Vallely’s comments, he addresses the fraudulent BC at about four minutes into the tape.


23 posted on 06/14/2011 7:52:49 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: atc23

maybe. he’s definitely hiding something.
but it could be as simply as hiding the adoption by Soetoro, since he didn’t legally change his name back.
(which i think is related to why a Hawaiian has a Connecticut SSN... which is impossible to do legally.)


24 posted on 06/14/2011 7:55:17 PM PDT by Elendur (the hope and change i need: Sarah / Colonel West in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

It certainly does. I am heartened by the fact that we have people monitoring this situation that know what they are doing...and are not just crackpots.


25 posted on 06/14/2011 8:00:19 PM PDT by LUV W (RUN SARAH...R U N!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sklar

LOL


26 posted on 06/14/2011 8:09:01 PM PDT by saltus (God's Will be done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

Me too .. that gives me something ... hope, encouragement ..that even they know. But it all comes down to: just who in the right position of authority will stand up, risk all and fight for this country. That’s the 64K question. Keep praying.


27 posted on 06/14/2011 8:10:43 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
One thing that bothers me about Obama's long form birth certificate that Obama released on April 27, 2011 is this: How can Hawaii registrar Onaka now say that he is forbidden by Hawaii privacy laws to allow reporters to examine Obama's original birth certificate that is in the archives, when Obama has already VOLUNTARILY released his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011? Doesn't the phrase "in the public domain" take over here?

1. April 27, 2011, Obama releases his long form birth certificate to great fanfare at a White House press conference.

2. HAWAII REGISTRAR ONAKA: But now when reporters ask Hawaii official Onaka to allow them to examine the original birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, Onaka---as I understand it---declares that he cannot do so because of privacy laws.

3. Huh? I thought that when Obama VOLUNTARILY released his long form on April 27, 2011, the long form birth certificate became part of the public domain, that is, I thought that Obama gave up his right to hide behind privacy laws when he VOLUNTARILY released his long form himself on April 27, 2011.

4. Again, how in the world can Onaka---whose name is stamped on Obama's long form birth certificate---on the one hand, claim that privacy laws forbid him from allowing reporters to examine Obama's original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, when, on the other hand, Obama has already VOLUNTARILY released his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011?

5. It makes no sense to me.

6. To me, it seems that Hawaii officials and Obama are trying to hide something damaging to Obama that is on the long form in the Hawaii archives but is not on the long form birth certificate that Obama released to the public on April 27, 2011.

7. PRESIDENT OBAMA RESPONSIBLE FOR ONAKA'S STONEWALLING? Why doesn't President Obama simply tell Onaka to allow reporters to examine his original long form birth certificate in the HAWAII archives that should have the same EXACT information that is on the copy that President Obama released on April 27, 2011 to great fanfare at a White House press conference?

8. I think that Registrar Onaka and Obama are hiding something.

9. I wish that reporters and the public would put continuous pressure on President Obama during this 2012 presidential campaign to allow them to look at his original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, because if Obama refuses to allow reporters to examine the original long form that is in the Hawaii archives, then I can only conclude that President Obama is trying to hide something.

10. And with every day that goes by without President Obama allowing reporters to examine his original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, I say that President Obama loses another vote on election day Nov. 2012.

28 posted on 06/14/2011 8:11:08 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

***They didn’t vote to convict Clinton because the public didn’t want it.***

They didn’t vote to convict Clinton because Gore would have become president and eligible to finish Clinton’s term, and then run on his own for the presidency. If he ran and won for a second term, he would have had something like ten years as president.


29 posted on 06/14/2011 8:12:42 PM PDT by kitkat ( I sure HOPE that it's time for a CHANGE from Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I’m wondering if there is even ONE in Congress with the integrity to openly challenge this corruption? The htreat of black people rioting is not enough to allow the nation to be destroyed, so why is there not even one congress critter with the integrity to use their office to get to the facts on the late-filed selective service registration, the fraudulent use of a CT social security number, the fraudulent thing ‘released’ on April 27, the lack of even one factual college record for the bastard? I know my two Senators in Tennessee are feckless fools, and I have discovered my congressional rep, Dr. Roe, is a cowardly pawn, but surely there is one who has the integrity to use their office for discobvering the facts and exposing this sonofabitch dog to the world! If not, this Republic is dead, because the pirate Roberts has squelched any aspect of the eligibility issue, so there is no other venue to right the ship of state.


30 posted on 06/14/2011 8:16:35 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Your old tax dollars finally at work


31 posted on 06/14/2011 8:17:04 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Maybe this is going to leave a mark, hopefully.
32 posted on 06/14/2011 8:23:43 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Sounds like the guys that were discussing this in that video are some of the ones that are risking their whole careers and credibility on knowing the facts and bringing them to light.

I just hope it resonates with the ones that count that can deal with this serious situation!


33 posted on 06/14/2011 8:25:25 PM PDT by LUV W (RUN SARAH...R U N!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

One of the nitwits in last night’s debate said he was the son of legal immigrants. I think it was Pawlenty? Doesn’t that disqualify him as “natural born”?


34 posted on 06/14/2011 8:26:34 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

bookmark


35 posted on 06/14/2011 8:28:01 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Bump-mark.


36 posted on 06/14/2011 8:34:54 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

Will history ever report this despicable chapter ..


37 posted on 06/14/2011 8:38:07 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I sincerely hope so! And I hope this chapter is a short one!


38 posted on 06/14/2011 8:49:02 PM PDT by LUV W (RUN SARAH...R U N!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

What’s the downside to a Soetoro adoption? That he was, for a while, an Indonesian?


39 posted on 06/14/2011 8:49:39 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; little jeremiah; azishot; LucyT; Fantasywriter; STARWISE
Something is totally upside down with that Dunham/Obama family. The Stanley Ann Dunham's Social Security application was revised in July 1965, but she signed it in 1959.

It looks like another case of piss poor government forgery.


Article here.

Irrefutable Proof Obama's Mama's Social Security Application Fraudulent: 1965 Application Form Signed In 1959; Got Time Machine!?

40 posted on 06/14/2011 8:49:48 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson