Skip to comments.JUSTIA.COM CAUGHT RED HANDED HIDING REFERENCES TO MINOR v. HAPPERSETT IN PUBLISHED SCOTUS OPINIONS
Posted on 07/01/2011 4:01:29 PM PDT by SatinDoll
The US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com is the leading resource on the internet which publishes United States Supreme Court decisions. They have been caught red handed in an Orwellian attempt to revise US Supreme Court cases which mention Minor v. Happersett as precedent on the issue of citizenship, as opposed to the other issue decided in Minor, voting rights.
I have documented two incredible examples where Justia.com has been caught in the act of taking a hatchet job to US Supreme Court decisions by removing, not just the case name, Minor v. Happersett, but whole passages related to Chief Justice Waites statements on the citizenship issue which were cited favorably in BOYD V. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER, 143 U. S. 135 (1892), and POPE V. WILLIAMS, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).
I have published my complete investigation into this fraud perpetrated by Justia.com including snapshots and evidence collected from the Way Back Machine at the Internet Archive in the comments section of my previous report, THE EXPRESS LANE TO NATURAL BORN CLARITY. My investigation was triggered by a readers comment regarding Boyd. The comment was on a separate issue. But I then noticed that the Boyd case, as currently published by Justia.com, made reference to Minor v. Happersett without properly naming the case.
This is beyond shocking. Somebody, back in 2008, just prior to the election, ordered these revisions and saw to their execution. This is direct tampering with United States law. And it is evidence that Minor v. Happersett was known to be a huge stumbling block to POTUS eligibility.
It confirms that Minor v. Happersett was seen as a dangerous US Supreme Court precedent which construed the natural-born citizen clause of Article 2 Section 1 to make only those persons born in the US to citizen parents (plural) eligible to be President.
According to binding US Supreme Court precedent, Obama is not eligible to be President. And we are obviously very late coming to this legal truth. Somebody at Justia.com tried to control and alter our awareness by hiding important Supreme Court references to Minor dating back to 2008. This is smoking gun proof of tampering. Please read my full report here.
There needs to be an investigation.
Are these Democratic Party moles pulling this shit, or what?
HolyMoly .. the reach and treachery of the cretins is beyond outrageous!
Whoa. If true, and I doubt whether Donofrio would lie about this, then it could be the smoking gun.
Obama managed to put the issue to sleep again by using Trump as an excuse to release his long-form COLB on the net and then immediately distract attention from the comments of experts who found it to be a forgery by breaking the news about the COLB immediately before the planned raid on bin Ladin.
I have said that I doubt very much whether this will permanently kill the problem. Obama has tried various means to kill it earlier, with eager cooperation from virtually the entire press, including conservative outlets that are presumably feeling the pressure. Yet doubts have continually persisted, and the story has revived, and I believe a majority of Americans still doubt whether he is really an American.
This story, of course, bears more immediately on the problem that if Obama’s story is accepted, then his father was still a citizen of the British colony of Kenya at the time he was born. So he is not a natural born citizen even if we take him at his word. Which is a big IF indeed, since he is a congenital liar, and both COLBs are obvious fakes.
So Leo was lucky enough to catch this. It makes you wonder how many more things are being edited to benefit the DNC and or others.
Mark my words, I don’t want it but I see CWII becoming more and more inevitable. God have mercy on us all.
Here is a lesson... instead of taking the ramblings of lunatics on blogs at face value... see if they are lying to you.
Go to the Justia page, and look at the Boyd case for yourself.
WAIT... what do we see?
Oh yes... As remarked by Mr. Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 88 U. S. 167:
And what about the Pope case that Leo is rambling about?
YEP, Minor is clearly referenced throughout the case.
Now Leo was hoping that you wouldn’t do what I did, and click on the Justia link and see if he was lying. He wants you to take his word for everything. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if he deliberately doctored his screenshot himself to make it look like a CONSPIWACY!!!! exists where it doesn’t.
Next time, check for yourself.
Oh wait... let me guess, the Lizard people were scared because Leo boy called them out, and then they quickly went back and fixed the links in the Justia stuff, because we all know that JUSTIA IS THE BE ALLZ AND END ALLZ OF SUPREME COURTZ MATERIALZ!!!!
Think about this for a second people... Justia isn’t an official repository of anything. It’s an unofficial cite that links people to Court cases.
If the Lizard People really wanted to “scrub the record” of Minor, because “it is such a devastating case for Obama”, why didn’t they touch Findlaw or Open Jurist? (Two other unofficial repositories). Moreover, since all of these are unofficial web sources, couldn’t people just go down to their local law library and look up the cases in an official reporter?
What about Westlaw and Lexis, do the Lizard People have to go there too?
I’ve already shown you that Leo is lying at worst, or delusional at best regarding his “VAST CONSPIWACY INVOLVINGZ JUSTIAZ!!!” if he can’t even get this right, why take anything else he says at face value?
Go read the article. He took snapshots and investigated it back through early in 2008.
The conspiracy to get an ineligible candidate elected president is unraveling.
He’s lying. I just linked you to the Justia pages, which has the references to Minor that he claims the “EVILLZZZ CONSPIWACY” took out.
You can take what he says at face value if you want, but it won’t make any of it true.
You go freedomtroll....ping your backup.
Did you use the wayback machine and check the case during the time D mentioned? He’s NOT talking about now, he’s talking about in 2008...
"The comment was on a separate issue. But I then noticed that the Boyd case, as currently published by Justia.com, made reference to Minor v. Happersett without properly naming the case."
“Here is a lesson... instead of taking the ramblings of lunatics on blogs at face value... see if they are lying to you.”
Nice self description. You stink of desperation.
Somebody, back in 2008, just prior to the election,
WOW!!! 2008?!? ...thanks for posting this.
...that’s a pretty convincing smoking gun that they KNEW even back then.
(just like that paper from Obama’s law firm, that argued against the natural born clause, showing they clearly understood it was to a citizen father.
(in spite of the deniers here.)
...good points by detective also.
but theres lots more than can be mentioned. the forged Selective Service form, the impossible Connecticut SSN, the missing page 14 from the divorce records, lost kindergarden records in Hawaii, etc. Virginia Sunahara being in the birth index, but Hawaii officially saying they have no record of her... (I’m sure Satindoll could add much much more...)
They certainly are editing the history that is put forth in the public school textbooks.
Only an O-bot would do this! O-Bot!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.