Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Court Subpoena for Obama’s Original Birth Certificate Served to Hawaii Health Department
The Post & Email ^ | July 05, 2011 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 07/05/2011 7:39:19 PM PDT by RobinMasters

(Jul. 5, 2011) — A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her “to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying testing, or sampling of the material:”

original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, III [sic] issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now.

The subpoena allows Fuddy until August 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to produce the document.

The designated place of production is noted as:

Health Department State of HI 1250 Punchbowl str. room 325 Honolulu, HI 96813

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: barrysoetoro; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; fraud; hawaii; hopespringseternal; manyherare4obama; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz; taitz; thistimeforsure; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-231 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2011 7:39:21 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Well now.

Let’s see where this goes.


2 posted on 07/05/2011 7:41:44 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
To the Marxist the rule of law is useful for only **one** purpose: to be used against conservatives.

In all other situations the rule of law is to be ignored. Bet on it! Hawaiian officials will ignore this subpoena.

3 posted on 07/05/2011 7:41:57 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Finaly?? The real thing???


4 posted on 07/05/2011 7:42:43 PM PDT by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Is this a first???

Is it true?


5 posted on 07/05/2011 7:43:12 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727
Let’s see where this goes.

I think it's safe to predict where this will go.

6 posted on 07/05/2011 7:43:41 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Obama: ...”get in the back of the bus”


7 posted on 07/05/2011 7:43:54 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

How can one subpoena for something which doesn’t exist..


8 posted on 07/05/2011 7:44:23 PM PDT by EscapedDutch ("Socialism is great until you run out of other people's money" - Lady Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Out of curiosity, why didn’t they serve such a subpoena before? A lack of certificate number? Some other reason?


9 posted on 07/05/2011 7:45:56 PM PDT by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Much ado about nothing.
10 posted on 07/05/2011 7:46:47 PM PDT by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I’ve lost all hope that this issue is ever going anywhere. Congress and the non-Supreme Court has allowed this man to illegally be sworn in as president.


11 posted on 07/05/2011 7:46:50 PM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

The BC was his way of smartly testing the people’s commitment to the Constitution.

He has since escalated to rejecting Congressional input into the budget process.


12 posted on 07/05/2011 7:47:32 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Biden- No representation for Gopers, Obama-Gopers must get in the back of the bus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

One can only hope.

Yeah, I know - Hope is not a plan. But without hope, what is there?

All that’s required is 1 - just 1 chink in the armour - and then it all comes crashing down.


13 posted on 07/05/2011 7:47:43 PM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Is it an absolute rule of law that if you are served with a subpoena, you must comply?


14 posted on 07/05/2011 7:49:41 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

yeah, and the check is in the mail!!


15 posted on 07/05/2011 7:52:21 PM PDT by fish hawk (no more Barak "Dick" Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
The subpoena is signed by a deputy clerk

lol.

Oh, yeah, this is going to go far.

16 posted on 07/05/2011 7:52:41 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

“1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, III”

That’s brilliant.


17 posted on 07/05/2011 7:53:55 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping


18 posted on 07/05/2011 7:54:20 PM PDT by sweetiepiezer (I have a Pal In Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Registrar U.K.L.Lee?


19 posted on 07/05/2011 7:54:36 PM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

The subpoena is, almost certainly, filed by a lawyer and signed by the clerk.

Not quite toilet paper, but not the same as one from a Federal judge or a Grand Jury.


20 posted on 07/05/2011 7:56:52 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4. If that is granted, all else follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

I think you can go to jail for contempt of court instead. FWIW, I’m not a lawyer but I still manage to aggravate the legal so-called professon.


21 posted on 07/05/2011 7:59:24 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Well, they have almost a month to produce a new forgery.
No problem for the Messiah and his pals.

The lefties, however, are now claiming that a birth certificate has no bearing on his qualifications to be POTUS, and Obama does not have to show anything to indicate or prove that he is qualified.


22 posted on 07/05/2011 8:07:27 PM PDT by AlexW (Proud eligibility skeptic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

FYI, a postage meter is not acceptable as proof of mailing. Needs to have some form of USPS stamp cancellation of other USPS applied notation that it was deposited with the USPS.


23 posted on 07/05/2011 8:07:42 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
The state can file a motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum.
24 posted on 07/05/2011 8:11:03 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Say what you will about Orly Taitz, but I absolutely admire her tenacity. If ever there was a "little engine that could", she is it. I'm sure the Hawaii DOH will refuse to comply (once again as before), but if she has been granted discovery, this will not endear the court to the defense. As long as we keep talking about it, more and more people realize we've "been had" and anger mounts as people realize the Executive Office is in an usurper's hands. Thank you, Orly Taitz, for giving us something to talk about!


25 posted on 07/05/2011 8:14:26 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

They finally have finished Obama’s perfectly falsified BC.


26 posted on 07/05/2011 8:14:59 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

If it’s a clerk of the court and it was served properly as it appears to be so using a process server, it is legal that Hawaii must comply or try an attempt to quash.


27 posted on 07/05/2011 8:16:27 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters; butterdezillion; rxsid; Fred Nerks; Danae; Ladysforest; Brown Deer; Kenny Bunk; ...
Subtitle - U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN HONOLULU SUBPOENAS LORETTA J. FUDDY, HAWAII HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR

Last time, Fuddy claimed the subpoena wasn't served properly from the District of Hawaii.

So now, this District of Hawaii US District Court subpoena demands to examine the
original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II

What possible reason could Zero have for fighting THAT other than his April 27th 'release' being an amateurish fraud?
28 posted on 07/05/2011 8:16:46 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

But must one always comply with a subpoena?


29 posted on 07/05/2011 8:17:06 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan; doc1019

http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule45.htm


30 posted on 07/05/2011 8:17:53 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

In other words, no without involving other lawyers. Thanks.


31 posted on 07/05/2011 8:21:31 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

The media was also guilty of coverup and non-vetting of a candidate.

I hope this blows up in the face of the MSM and destroys their biased networks and newspapers.


32 posted on 07/05/2011 8:23:39 PM PDT by Aroostook25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

We’ll know it’s real if it’s handwritten. That is the one point on which the two eyewitnesses, Fukino and Abercrombie, agree. Fukino said the original was “half handwritten” and Amercrombie said that what was on file was a “notation”—something “written down”.

Makes you wonder what’s on that ‘notation’, that is so damaging they’d risk releasing a document that matches neither description. Yes, it’s a lapdog press, and Alinsky mockery goes a long way. But there was always the chance one ‘journalist’ might ask why what was released bore no resemblance to the description of what was seen in the file. For Obama to take that chance means the ‘notation’ is NOT something he can risk being seen by the general public.


33 posted on 07/05/2011 8:23:44 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Ain’t gonna happen.


34 posted on 07/05/2011 8:24:23 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

35 posted on 07/05/2011 8:25:31 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA; little jeremiah
Ping to new action in Taitz v. Astrue









P>

36 posted on 07/05/2011 8:26:34 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

.


37 posted on 07/05/2011 8:30:40 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
There is also a pending subpoena to Social Security regarding Obazo's fraudulent SS number. SCOTUS may actually hear a case on one of these two potential cases. Obazo may be sorry he insulted them.
38 posted on 07/05/2011 8:31:01 PM PDT by Grey Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EscapedDutch; All; Spunky; ~Kim4VRWC's~; ~Peter; 1035rep; 2ndDivisionVet; 3D-JOY; 4woodenboats; ...

This almost certainly means they have finally FORGED a copy that will pass muster and inspection from all aspects paper, ink, typewriter, fonts etc.,and want to introduce it via this subpoena! I’m not sure who filed with the court to view it. Ann Obama supporter?

As you say, it didn’t exist - TILL NOW! So they want to “produce” it.


39 posted on 07/05/2011 8:35:27 PM PDT by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EscapedDutch
How can one subpoena for something which doesn’t exist..

BTT! It is a forgery, probably from a late filing application (not approved because of lack of supporting records). There is no long form BC in HI for Obozo....

40 posted on 07/05/2011 8:36:52 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Unless it is the real this, someone on the internet will catch it.


41 posted on 07/05/2011 8:38:55 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FARS

... still isn’t a son of two American parents...


42 posted on 07/05/2011 8:39:06 PM PDT by himno hero ("Armageddon is well seeded, America will pay"... Barrack Obama's vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Do you think they would release a THIRD or FOURTH birth certificate??

After all this?

Who would believe it?


43 posted on 07/05/2011 8:43:23 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; Seizethecarp

PING!


44 posted on 07/05/2011 8:43:56 PM PDT by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
NEW AFFIDAVIT Dated July 4, 2011, about the April 27, 2011 News Conference and false statements made there and Plausible Deniability.
45 posted on 07/05/2011 8:49:38 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aroostook25

“The media was also guilty of coverup and non-vetting of a candidate.”

So was the Republican party, or McCain perhaps.

I supported McCain but I can’t understand why he did not challenge Obama’s citizenship publicly. It was and is an important issue. He wouldn’t touch it.


46 posted on 07/05/2011 8:53:00 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All

Ooops! If filed by Orly then it’s a genuine attempt to get at the truth. They now have time to forge and comply with typewriter etc.

Interestingly the subpoena about the Social Security numbers may be what breaks open the log jam.

I also do not think the SUPREMES will stand for any more blocks like ignoring subpoenas after how he treated them. And his appointee Kagan is reportedly being scrutinized for conflict of interest.


47 posted on 07/05/2011 8:54:50 PM PDT by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

The only person who has to believe it is the judge, and the records of these judges is dismal.

I don’t know why Taitz didn’t subpoena the embedded transaction logs and complete vital records history for Obama. That is the only way we’ll ever know what really happened with his birth record, SS number, and passport. And did she really put Obama III instead of II? (sigh)


48 posted on 07/05/2011 8:57:35 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
Out of curiosity, why didn’t they serve such a subpoena before? A lack of certificate number? Some other reason?

I think that no case had before progressed to the point of discovery where the plaintiff could issue subpoenas. I'm pretty sure HI has already said it would ignore any subpoena for documents.
49 posted on 07/05/2011 9:00:08 PM PDT by andyk (Interstate <> Intrastate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Absolutely no where, will simply be ignored.


50 posted on 07/05/2011 9:00:14 PM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson