Skip to comments.Sarah Palin as Newsweek cover girl — again (Sexism, thy name is jourbalist)
Posted on 07/11/2011 9:16:57 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
As celebrity glamour shots go, Sarah Palins cover photo on this weeks Newsweek is danged good! The best-selling author and reality-TV star looks young and vibrant. Her devil-may-care countenance aided and abetted by the wind conspicuously blowing hair back. And while her outfit might be laid back, theres no doubt shes in total control. But when Palins cover shot is viewed through the prism of presidential politics, its a dud.
Folks want to be able to envision someone sitting in the Oval Office.
They dont necessarily want to envision them in the pages of Esquire magazines Sexiest Woman Alive 2011 or Maxim. She cant possibly be taken seriously as a presidential contender dressed like that, especially since this is the second time she has graced Newsweek in a less-than-presidential pose. But let me move away from the superficial to the substance of what the half-term governor has to say in the Newsweek interview. Im particularly incensed by the lunacy of her comments on the impending default of the United States.
It is not the apocalypse, she said, and questioned the need for the urgent negotiating sessions Republicans and Democrats were conducting in search of a debt-limit agreement (ongoing at press time). The fact is that we have $2.6 trillion in revenue coming in, and if we just use some common sense there take that revenue, service the debt first, take care of national priorities we dont have to increase debt.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Is’t that what some Gay people are?
Isn’t that what some Gay people are?
But ,But a Democrat sitting and smoking crack is OK!
You’re thinking about Gerbalists...you devil. They are usually teabaggers, too, not so co-incidentally.
Capehart is holding out for Boy George. I guess the term “sugar daddy” caught his attention.
“Jourbalist” is perhaps the greatest term ever coined to describe a homosexualist reporter.
Oh, Democrats have made good, bad and bad, good. EVERYTHING they do (which leads to nihilism, dysfunction and destruction of civil societies and freedom) is, of course, good.
Oh yeah, like this?
That, by itself, is a howler. Libs turn every single one of their presidential candidates into a sex symbol. Obama was portrayed as a sex symbol. Back in 92 Clinton and Gore were portrayed as sex symbols. Its a constant pining for another sexy, young, liberal John Kennedy clone. And remember how the Libs got all hot and bothered about JFK, Jr.--a stupid Himbo if there ever was one--running for the Senate or Congress in New York.
The rest of the article is typical Lib garbage that has been repeated over and over and over. Not worth talking about.
Ok ... Why no wedding band? Did they air brush it out?
These poor fools don’t even realize time, actual time, has passed them by....no one cares what they say or write.....they are only talking to each other
Interesting, now that you mention it. I wonder why, too.
I’ve seen lots of pictures of her without a wedding ring.
She does not normally wear a wedding band.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.