Posted on 07/14/2011 9:31:56 AM PDT by truthnomatterwhat
Most people and particularly women will tell you that they do not drink enough water. Drinking healthy water is essential to health, beauty and longevity. One can survive without food for 40 days, but ones health will gradually deteriorate without water after two days depending on temperature and amount of body water loss.
Moreover, it is not only the kind of water we drink — be it tap water, bottled water or alkaline ionized water — or how much we drink. It is also however, very important when we drink it. Drinking water at the correct time increases its effective functions on the human body. So what’s the correct time for drinking water and its benefits?
Here’s how to drink water at the correct time to maximizes its effectiveness on your Body:
** Drink two glasses of water after waking up – helps activate internal organs. ** Drink one glass of water 30 Minutes before meal – helps digestion
There's more of: Benefits of Drinking Water at The Correct Time « http://www.healthalkaline.com/alkalinewater/benefits-of-drinking-water-at-correct-time/#ixzz1S641dXrG
(Excerpt) Read more at healthalkaline.com ...
As I recall, beer is about 90% water...
•Drink two glasses of water after waking up – helps activate internal organs.
•Drink one glass of water 30 Minutes before meal – helps digestion
•Drink one glass of water before taking a bath – helps lower blood pressure
•Drink one glass of water before sleep – may help to avoid stroke or heart attack.
BTTT!
And contains nutrients. My friend, the retired cardiologist, says when pulling a beer out of the fridge: "A sandwich in every bottle".
Beer is proof that there is a God, and that he loves us.
Fish poop in water. Beer is filtered and enhanced water. ;)
/johnny
Rule of 3s:
Three minutes without air
Three days without water
Three weeks without food
Three hours without Free Republic!
When you drink? Just before you are thirsty.
And then you're up in the middle of the night going to the bathroom and can't get back to sleep.
Drink one glass of water before sleep, it will guarantee you will have to get up in the middle of the night and may break your neck on the way to the bathroom....
Does single malt Scotch work?
Why not a cup, a dram, a snifter, a liter, a carton, a bottle, a thermos????
1. The discoverer pitches the claim directly to the media.
The integrity of science rests on the willingness of scientists to expose new ideas and findings to the scrutiny of other scientists. Thus, scientists expect their colleagues to reveal new findings to them initially. An attempt to bypass peer review by taking a new result directly to the media, and thence to the public, suggests that the work is unlikely to stand up to close examination by other scientists.
One notorious example is the claim made in 1989 by two chemists from the University of Utah, B. Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, that they had discovered cold fusion—a way to produce nuclear fusion without expensive equipment. Scientists did not learn of the claim until they read reports of a news conference. Moreover, the announcement dealt largely with the economic potential of the discovery and was devoid of the sort of details that might have enabled other scientists to judge the strength of the claim or to repeat the experiment. (Ian Wilmut’s announcement that he had successfully cloned a sheep was just as public as Pons and Fleischmann’s claim, but in the case of cloning, abundant scientific details allowed scientists to judge the work's validity.)
Some scientific claims avoid even the scrutiny of reporters by appearing in paid commercial advertisements. A health-food company marketed a dietary supplement called Vitamin O in full-page newspaper ads. Vitamin O turned out to be ordinary saltwater.
2. The discoverer says that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work.
The idea is that the establishment will presumably stop at nothing to suppress discoveries that might shift the balance of wealth and power in society. Often, the discoverer describes mainstream science as part of a larger conspiracy that includes industry and government. Claims that the oil companies are frustrating the invention of an automobile that runs on water, for instance, are a sure sign that the idea of such a car is baloney. In the case of cold fusion, Pons and Fleischmann blamed their cold reception on physicists who were protecting their own research in hot fusion.
3. The scientific effect involved is always at the very limit of detection.
Alas, there is never a clear photograph of a flying saucer, or the Loch Ness monster. All scientific measurements must contend with some level of background noise or statistical fluctuation. But if the signal-to-noise ratio cannot be improved, even in principle, the effect is probably not real and the work is not science.
Thousands of published papers in para-psychology, for example, claim to report verified instances of telepathy, psychokinesis, or precognition. But those effects show up only in tortured analyses of statistics. The researchers can find no way to boost the signal, which suggests that it isn't really there.
4. Evidence for a discovery is anecdotal.
If modern science has learned anything in the past century, it is to distrust anecdotal evidence. Because anecdotes have a very strong emotional impact, they serve to keep superstitious beliefs alive in an age of science. The most important discovery of modern medicine is not vaccines or antibiotics, it is the randomized double-blind test, by means of which we know what works and what doesn't. Contrary to the saying, “data” is not the plural of “anecdote.”
5. The discoverer says a belief is credible because it has endured for centuries.
There is a persistent myth that hundreds or even thousands of years ago, long before anyone knew that blood circulates throughout the body, or that germs cause disease, our ancestors possessed miraculous remedies that modern science cannot understand. Much of what is termed “alternative medicine” is part of that myth.
Ancient folk wisdom, rediscovered or repackaged, is unlikely to match the output of modern scientific laboratories.
6. The discoverer has worked in isolation.
The image of a lone genius who struggles in secrecy in an attic laboratory and ends up making a revolutionary breakthrough is a staple of Hollywood's science-fiction films, but it is hard to find examples in real life. Scientific breakthroughs nowadays are almost always syntheses of the work of many scientists.
7. The discoverer must propose new laws of nature to explain an observation.
A new law of nature, invoked to explain some extraordinary result, must not conflict with what is already known. If we must change existing laws of nature or propose new laws to account for an observation, it is almost certainly wrong.
No way! He eats 6 raw eggs upon getting up. I saw him do it in a movie....must be accurate, movies don’t lie.
“Drink one glass of water before sleep – may help to avoid stroke or heart attack.”
Uh-huh. And wet the bed!
I take an aspirin with a few sips of water.
“Fish **** in it”
If you are drinking out of the fishbowl you are doing it wrong.
“Drink two glasses of water after waking up “
Slackers. Drink it before you wake up and save time!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.