Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

E-Verify says Obama not eligible for employment in the United States
The Steady Drip ^ | Sunday, September 11, 2011 | Sam Sewell

Posted on 09/11/2011 4:20:26 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

E-Verify is an Internet-based system operated by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA). E-Verify is currently free to employers and is available in all 50 states. E-Verify provides an automated link to federal databases to help employers determine employment eligibility of new hires and the validity of their Social Security numbers.
If you were an employer and entered Barack Hussein Obama’s social security number 042-68-4425 into the data base to verify that he was eligible for employment in the United States you could not legally hire him.

Here is what e-verify would tell you about hiring Mr. Obama:





TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Education; Government; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: barrysoetoro; birthers; certifigate; ct; elections; eligibility; everify; fraud; idenitytheft; identity; illegals; immigration; naturalborncitizen; nbc; noteligible; obama; obamacrimes; obamafraud; palin; perry; sheriffjoe; undodumented; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2011 4:20:31 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

How is that SS# known to be ozero’s ?


2 posted on 09/11/2011 4:23:26 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

someone will soon be receiving a visit from men in dark suits and glasses...red


3 posted on 09/11/2011 4:24:38 PM PDT by rednek ("Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Is this a gag? How do we know what Obummers SS# is?


4 posted on 09/11/2011 4:24:45 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

but he’s black! (sarc/)


5 posted on 09/11/2011 4:25:15 PM PDT by max americana (FUBO NATION 2012 FK BARAK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Interesting, but we all know this will go nowhere, cause it’s Obummer, not Bush!


6 posted on 09/11/2011 4:25:26 PM PDT by blondee123 (Obama-The Wanna-be Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

The bammers been usin’ Harrison J Bounel’s SSN the last few years. Check out Harrison J Bounel on Facebook


7 posted on 09/11/2011 4:26:54 PM PDT by stickywillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

NO, it is not a gag...that is the number barry uses and has used for years. HE IS AN ILLEGAL...


8 posted on 09/11/2011 4:26:54 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shield

Maybe, but this is NOT what a SSN rejection from everify looks like.....this is a hoax


9 posted on 09/11/2011 4:28:56 PM PDT by mpackard (Read my Lip-Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mpackard

OH OK....I see, thanks.


10 posted on 09/11/2011 4:33:19 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knarf
I know this is preaching to the choir, but really, seriously.... let your mind free to imagine what CBS NBC ABC NYT WAPO MSNBC would be saying and doing if this came up during GWB's Presidency.

Just take a minute and let yourself really truly imagine it.

11 posted on 09/11/2011 4:34:40 PM PDT by sklar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mpackard

Can you show us what one looks like, then?


12 posted on 09/11/2011 4:39:15 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (We still hold these truths to be self-evident...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Another look at Obama's Social Security number

"They were stupid to use the CT number on the [Selective Service] card," Daniels adds, "because now there is no way for [Obama] to back out of that number."

Other than the 1980 Selective Service registration, the first time Daniels could find Obama using the "042" number was in 1986 in Chicago.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2442166/posts

13 posted on 09/11/2011 4:39:41 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

14 posted on 09/11/2011 4:50:52 PM PDT by KevinDavis (What has Ron Paul done in Congress??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Why the democRATs are adamantly against E-Verify? Could be.
15 posted on 09/11/2011 4:50:55 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana
but he’s black! (sarc/)

It's the reason nothing he does (or orchestrates), or has done in his past (which is essentially verboten to human eyes) can be held against him. For that matter, add the New Black Panthers and flash mobs of "youths" destroying businesses, theme parks, and anything else they select.

16 posted on 09/11/2011 4:51:41 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

If we only had Conservative’s version of Dan Rather...


17 posted on 09/11/2011 4:54:49 PM PDT by corlorde (NH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Possibly, I have one at work.....if I’m able to sneak it away I will tomorrow.


18 posted on 09/11/2011 4:58:35 PM PDT by mpackard (Read my Lip-Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mpackard

How do you know it’s different? In what way does it differ? Thanks.


19 posted on 09/11/2011 5:05:43 PM PDT by sklar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Doe this pass the Dan Rather/CBS “fake but accurate” test?


20 posted on 09/11/2011 5:11:45 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


21 posted on 09/11/2011 5:17:11 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I downloaded the E-Verify employer's manual, and the following was on pg 23:

click it for a larger view

22 posted on 09/11/2011 5:17:50 PM PDT by tomkat (NEVER FORGET / NEVER FORGIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

Thank you.


23 posted on 09/11/2011 5:26:40 PM PDT by upchuck (Rerun: Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Did you see the post #21 right after your ping?


24 posted on 09/11/2011 5:27:04 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Oops!
The one in my #22 above is from the general public user manual.

This two below are from the employer's manual.
The first is a tentative finding, and the one below it is a final nonconfirmation.

Not to say the one originally posted above isn't valid, but this is what I found.
YMMV


25 posted on 09/11/2011 5:28:26 PM PDT by tomkat (NEVER FORGET / NEVER FORGIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Don't thank me yet .. lol .. see #25 first.

But regardless, you're welcome

26 posted on 09/11/2011 5:29:57 PM PDT by tomkat (NEVER FORGET / NEVER FORGIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

That form is on another site. The url is:
https://selfcheck.uscis.gov/

Is that the url listed in the manual you have?


27 posted on 09/11/2011 5:56:57 PM PDT by joedel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

In Cheney’s book interview weeks ago he was speaking about helping Bush do the vetting process for VP before he was going to be the VP. While I think Obama is the biggest lying crook how could he pass a basic background check much less a top secret? Don’t get me wrong I think Obama id hiding a lot but how did he pass this? The CIA intel world would be all over this you would think.


28 posted on 09/11/2011 6:16:02 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (Cash for clunkers, subsidies - none has worked. The left =one-trick pony on the economy $pend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: joedel
The manual I have is a 4Mb .pdf file.
This footer is used on all its 82 pages:


29 posted on 09/11/2011 6:16:36 PM PDT by tomkat (NEVER FORGET / NEVER FORGIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

One would think :)


30 posted on 09/11/2011 6:17:11 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

If the OPs form is from a different site, it may very well look different. Can’t tell because the site is down for maint right now. From what I can tell, the https://selfcheck.uscis.gov/ site gets its info from e-verify.


31 posted on 09/11/2011 6:26:28 PM PDT by joedel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Our political leaders (Senators and Reps.) will now tell us that we cannot “trust” the E-Verify system, nor the SSA system! So, all you employers out there, if you get caught hiring “illegals”, when asked by Immigration why you did not use the E-Verify system, all you have to say is: Our political leaders have said E-Verify isn’t “trustworthy”!!!!!


32 posted on 09/11/2011 6:31:02 PM PDT by DixT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Sigh.... Orly Taitz again.


33 posted on 09/11/2011 6:53:25 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Well it would seem they are all in on it.All big gubmint and he is the one that is tasked with pulling it off.I dont trust anybody in DC and only a few local politicians.


34 posted on 09/11/2011 6:59:01 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Well it would seem they are all in on it.All big gubmint and he is the one that is tasked with pulling it off.I dont trust anybody in DC and only a few local politicians.


35 posted on 09/11/2011 6:59:16 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Is it?


36 posted on 09/11/2011 7:00:01 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (We still hold these truths to be self-evident...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

I don’t know. LOL... I just posted what someone emailed to me because it looked intriguing. :-)

Personally, I don’t like Obama or E-Verify.


37 posted on 09/11/2011 7:03:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (We still hold these truths to be self-evident...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

ping


38 posted on 09/11/2011 7:16:17 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf; Lazlo in PA; RobinMasters; ml/nj; butterdezillion; All

i don’t know about e-verify. but many people have done a lot of research on this SSN. it was on the Selective Service form, that many people think is a forgery.

and under the rules at the time, the only way he could of got a Connecticut SSN as a Hawaiian teenager, would be to go to CT, and apply in person. which he didn’t...


39 posted on 09/11/2011 7:45:22 PM PDT by Elendur (It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Things that make ya go Hmmmmm.


40 posted on 09/11/2011 7:54:54 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elendur
and under the rules at the time, the only way he could of got a Connecticut SSN as a Hawaiian teenager, would be to go to CT, and apply in person.

Totally false. Since 1972 the SSA has been issuing numbers from the central Baltimore office and the region number in the SSN is issued based on the ZIP code listed on the application form ... regardless of where the applicant actually lived or applied.

41 posted on 09/11/2011 9:14:41 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

If you go to the source site, it comes from a Taitz filing. Meh


42 posted on 09/11/2011 9:45:10 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Danae

I don’t go to those sites. I value my machine. So I’ll take your word for it.


43 posted on 09/11/2011 10:16:05 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (We still hold these truths to be self-evident...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mpackard

This is exactly what the E-Verify response looks like. I printed it as soon as it came on the screen.

I used the government run E-Verify system to check Obama’s legal working status.

I figured I would be challenged for using E-Verify but I concluded it was a legitimate gray area as to exactly who is considered the employer of POTUS. I was willing to argue that I was one of his employers, particularly given the fact that so many people in positions of authority and responsibility said they had no idea who was responsible for vetting a potential POTUS. The results I got back pointed directly to fraud. But here is what I thought you would find interesting.

It has been pointed out to me recently that the section of E-Verify I thought was the “self service” section for employers was reserved NOT for employers but for potential employees.

I admit that I did not read the fine print, I barely read what I needed to in order to input the data and I am in the habit of always scrolling down and clicking “I agree” and then “next” without reading. I figured it was boiler plate language and skipped over it.

I am sure it did not register with me at all because why on earth would a person have to ask the goverment to tell them whether or not they are a citizen of the United States? I mean that is something each person knows about themselves. It would be like the government setting up a website for people to go and ask them “Do I have brown hair?” Why would a person have to ask the government if they are a citizen? An employer would need verification from the government about an employee but not the employee, he or she KNOWS if they are a citizen. So it never entered my mind that this section was not for employers.

But apparently the part of E-Verify that I used IS for potential employees to go to so they can find out if the name, SSN and birthdate they are using passes goverment muster or raises red flags. I have since gone back to actually read the directions and find that the potential employee is promised that IF the data they enter raises alarm bells that the information will be shared with no one.

Doesn’t that boggle your mind? The E-Verify website was set up for employers to verify the legal working status of their employees or potential employees, and in fact employers are requiered by law to check the legal working status of their employees. The whole point of it is to catch undocumented, illegal workers. BUT E-Verify also offers, on the same website, a section for potential employees to check whether or not the government knows they are undocumented so they can AVOID getting caught and the government has assured them that if the data they enter comes back as not legal they will deep six their illegal status. Linda Jordan


44 posted on 09/11/2011 11:17:20 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ethical; LucyT; null and void

LucyT - discussion about this E-verify; ethical says it looks like the real E-verify thingie, others disagree. I have no idea. But I’m sure Zero’s SS# ain’t any more bona fide than his name.


45 posted on 09/11/2011 11:21:51 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; little jeremiah; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

E-Verify says Obama not eligible for employment in the United States

. . . . Check out article.

46 posted on 09/11/2011 11:41:12 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks for the ping!


47 posted on 09/12/2011 1:10:38 AM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

bflr


48 posted on 09/12/2011 3:39:13 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; butterdezillion; rxsid; Fred Nerks; Danae; Ladysforest; SatinDoll; David; ...
Obama made public the SSN that he uses when he carelessly published his 2009 taxes and only amateurishly covered up the SSN (first with scratch-out) and then with a PDF layer of whiteout, that is easily removed.

Obama needs to explain HOW and WHY he uses a CONNECTICUT SSN?
He never lived there, and when it was issued in March 1977 you had to apply IN PERSON if more than 12 years old!
FRAUD-GATE

49 posted on 09/12/2011 4:12:13 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Pass what background check? When you are elected Senator, the only thing you need to get national security clearance is show up to your job as Senator. Same for President. Just by election alone, you are “approved” for security clearance.

That thought is terrifying, isn’t it?


50 posted on 09/12/2011 4:16:23 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson