Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Sarah Palin turned down invitation to tonight's CNN/TPX debate
Texans for Sarah Palin ^ | 12 September 2011 | Josh Painter

Posted on 09/12/2011 2:48:42 PM PDT by Windflier

According to this post title at The Other McCain, Gov. Palin has turned down the invitation that CNN had extended to her to participate in the debate being sponsored tonight by the network and Tea Party Express. We had gathered as much when no news came over the weekend that she had accepted the invitation, and Greta Van Susteren announced that Sarah Palin would be a guest on her "On The Record" program tonight.

If she had accepted the CNN invitation to debate, it would have likely been a violation of her contract with Fox News, a job the governor doesn't appear quite ready to give up -- at least not just yet.

Stacy also reports the results of CNN's latest GOP presidential poll, which has Gov. Palin in third place with 15 percent, behind Ranger Rick with 30 percent and Mitt Romney with 18 percent.

- JP


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2012gopdebates; debates; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: Windflier

This is real simple. Sarah Palin doesn’t need these debates to get her message out. She can get on TV anytime she wants. No sense exposing herself to inane questions by the media and loser contenders looking to gang up on her.


61 posted on 09/12/2011 4:33:37 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

... says the supporter of the part time Governor from Texas.


62 posted on 09/12/2011 4:36:05 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: carjic
"I don’t blame you guys for trashing her and trying to keep her out."

LOL!

Apparently you haven't seen me on other threads begging and hoping she runs! Do a search, you'll find me chanting "RUN SARAH RUN!" a lot. You see I want Sarah Palin to run. The only way to convince her worshipers that she isn't going to ride a massive conservative mandate into The White House is for her to run and get her little rear end kicked. If she fails to run I'm going to have to listen to her worshipers talking about how "invincible" she would have been if she had chosen to run.

No my FRiend. I WANT Sarah Palin to run for president.

63 posted on 09/12/2011 4:36:16 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Perry 2012! A Conservative who can win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

BS, Hucklebuck’s contract was ending and was up for renewal.
It was his choice to renewthe contract and NOT run.
And why do you conveniently overlook the several other statements in my post? How many people set their DVRs or clear their schedule to watch Santorum or Gingrich...ever?
Because they DO for a Sarah Palin appearance.


64 posted on 09/12/2011 4:36:16 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Bovina Sancta!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

” Polls are wondrous things to behold. I saw one today that had Perry first, romney second, Palin third, and Paul fourth ahead of Michele Bachmann by three points. “

I so agree with you. The “polls” are fun if they go our way, but you’re right. They are incidental. Then their is Rasmussen, who has the chops and the historical accuracy of a laser. I stick with Rasmussen for the facts and check there daily on Obama and on the race when they post it.


65 posted on 09/12/2011 4:36:47 PM PDT by RitaOK (TEXAS. It's EXHIBIT A for Rick. Perry/Rubio '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
I said a while ago that more to the point, Fox will NOT allow her to end her contract and it has spurred some animosity between her and Fox.

Actually, if Sarah announces her candidacy, Fox will end her contract for her, even against her will - they already did that to Gingrich and Santorum. Now, I don't know if there might be financial consequences for Sarah over that, but she certainly can get out of the contract if she wishes.

66 posted on 09/12/2011 4:38:03 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
It was clear from the onset that this was going to be an election cycle like no other— that we were going to hit early and hard. My stars, we’re under attack! The contenders were all aware of that. If they knew it, and we knew it, then you can bet Sarah knew it. The game has been on and the bench is emptied.

Obama is trying to run the Harry Truman "do nothing congress" routine of decades ago. There isn't anything especially new about it. Campaigns are ALWAYS rough and tumble and if you've been around for very long you should know that.

Palin does not know anything any other candidate doesn't know. The only difference is her negatives are astronomically bad and if she were planning to run for president she has conducted the absolute worst run up to announcing a campaign of any candidate I can remember in recent history. Quitting her job as governor, doing fluff RealityTV, hit and run appearances to grab media attention from other candidates, etc, has not worn well with Republican primary voters and the polls show this clearly.

She's not running.

67 posted on 09/12/2011 4:39:24 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: All

I swear you Perry supporters sound scared of her.


68 posted on 09/12/2011 4:46:01 PM PDT by McGruff (Why settle for second best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

She may win. She may lose. But if Perry wins...we all lose. He is a talker NOT a doer. This is on my ping list. We will talk.


69 posted on 09/12/2011 4:46:26 PM PDT by carjic (I've always been taught to respect my elders.... but it's getting harder to find any!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445

Hahahahahaha!


70 posted on 09/12/2011 4:48:04 PM PDT by rintense (Polls are for strippers and cross country skiing. ~ Sarah Palin, 9.3.11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

Well, since you don’t know and I don’t know the exact wording or circumstances of her contract, I will defer to Sarah’s smarts. She will do whatever she will do and I am just fine with that.
I have watched all the *debates* so far, and they were ridiculous. Why allow the msm to tear you down and make you look foolish while you KNOW they are in obama’s hip pocket?
Honestly. Have you seen ONE debate that was worth watching?
And tonight’s will be worse because you will have Michele Bachmann losing her mind and landing low blows on Rick Perry. That will help. Sure it will. /s
Prediction. After tonight, Bachmann is gonzo.


71 posted on 09/12/2011 4:51:07 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Bovina Sancta!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
And why do you conveniently overlook the several other statements in my post?

My criticism of your post was that it was a ridiculous theory, completely destroyed by the facts, on why Palin can't declare for President because of her contract with Fox News.

There is nothing in any of your posts that make any sense. It doesn't matter how many people DVR Gingrich or Santorum. It just isn't relevant because Fox has made it clear what their policy is and they are not treating her any different. The fact STILL remains, if Palin wants to run for President all she has to do is say the word and she will be suspended from Fox and free to rock and roll down the campaign trail. Fox is simply not blocking Palin's entry into the race. She can announce at any time and just hasn't.

Look, you obviously didn't know all the facts here. We're all wrong sometimes. Just let this one go.

72 posted on 09/12/2011 4:51:07 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

Primaries are like the Tour de France. You don’t win them, you just lose them. Last man (or woman) standing gets the trophy/nomination. Don’t count her out. She’s just letting the other candidates shoot themselves in the foot.


73 posted on 09/12/2011 4:55:18 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

THIS cycle sees Marxism institutionalized. This cycle is based on wonderment if it can even BE reversed it’s so pervasive. How many presidential terms will it take? The schools are churning out more of the same after now generations and we wonder why the enemy is within. Early and hard running for this cycle was mandatory and we all know it. We must have a leader early to rally a nation even if he is still in a campaign condition. There is no “official” push back until a contender rates being official. When the gap becomes wide enough that all comes together. I do not want Romney to be the nominee.


74 posted on 09/12/2011 4:56:44 PM PDT by RitaOK (TEXAS. It's EXHIBIT A for Rick. Perry/Rubio '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Sadly I was mistaken in my belief that conservatives had learned anything from previous elections. Unfortunately conservatives are even more willing to trade their principles for the first RINO to rattle the grain bucket. It just amazes me that now we’re not only trying to eliminate candidates before the first vote is taken but even before the candidates even decide on running.

I agree 100%. We are still months away from the Iowa caucus and already we have chicken littles running around proclaiming that it's "too late, too late" for others to get into the race.

Palin is doing the right thing by sitting the early part of the campaign out. Nothing good can come from Palin getting into the race too early. She already has near 100% name recognition and it is wise to let the current field settle out a bit. I can understand people like Santorum, Perry and Bachmann being in the race this early because they need to introduce themselves to a national audience.

If Palin waits so long to get into the race that she starts missing filing dates for primaries, then I could better understand all the hand-wringing. But until then, I think we need to trust that the lady knows what she is doing and she will be in this race all in good time.

75 posted on 09/12/2011 4:58:33 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Waiting for Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Oh. And here I thought we were talking about an appearance on CNN whether she was a canddidate or not.

Repeat from first post:

“She HAS been trying to reach out to other networks in ways that she does not break her contract with Fox, but she can’t sit for an interview or appear as a guest on any other network. I really don’t think she has a choice.”


76 posted on 09/12/2011 4:59:02 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Bovina Sancta!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445

"We're flat broke, but he thinks these solar shingles and really fast trains will magically save us.
So now he’s shouting all aboard the bullet train to bankruptcy. The 2012 election begins here.
We will fight for America and it starts here in Madison, Wisconsin.
Mr. President, game on!”
- Sarah Palin Madison, Wisconsin. April 16, 2011.
Run, Sarah, Run!

77 posted on 09/12/2011 5:19:57 PM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rintense

CNN wanted rating.


78 posted on 09/12/2011 5:27:20 PM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: "You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
THIS is what we KNOW at this point in time.

LOL!...nobody cares about facts C Dude.

79 posted on 09/12/2011 5:30:30 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (FREE YOUR BREASTS! FREE YOUR MIND!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445

Of course they did. Palin is smarter than that.


80 posted on 09/12/2011 5:34:05 PM PDT by rintense (Polls are for strippers and cross country skiing. ~ Sarah Palin, 9.3.11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson