Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In focusing on "Title", Palin Aims at the Establishment
09/29/2011 | Brices Crossroads

Posted on 09/29/2011 7:51:00 AM PDT by Brices Crossroads

In her recent interview, Sarah Palin has raised a bit of a kerfuffle among her supporters by referring once again to the "title" thing, as I call it. All she did was pose the question, "Is a title worth it?", and "Will a campaign shackle someone like me from effecting positive change?"

She never answered the questions. She articulated some of the arguments against running. She also said she could make a difference without a title. Once again, nothing but a proven historical fact, based upon her ability thus far to drive the political debate and to influence, in a major way, the outcome of the 2010 elections...all without a title.

Not one jot or tittle of this now well worn soliloquy of hers will have to be "walked back" when she announces. Everything she said about holding a title and the shackles of a campaign are accurate. The same arguments had equal, if not greater, resonance when she ran for Mayor, Lieutenant Governor and Governor. In each case, her calculus led her to the conclusion that, in spite of the shackles, the power that went with the title made the endeavor worthwhile. And the stakes for her city and state were nowhere near as high as they are for the United States in 2012.

She did, however, choose not to emphasize the much stronger arguments in favor of running, that is: with the title, comes enormous power which, held in the hands of a resolute executive like Reagan in the 1980s and Palin herself in Alaska, can achieve enormous, unprecedented good. Without the title and the power that accompanies it, the ability to make a difference will not disappear entirely, but it will be intermittent and sporadic. In the perilous four years that lie ahead of us, "intermittent and sporadic" won't cut the mustard, and she knows it.

Palin's constant harping on the "title" thing (as I call it) may be a diversion. She will allow her enemies to hear what they want to hear from her comments and if it causes them to miscalculate, oh well... However, I do not believe her repeated, almost pejorative, allusions to title are designed principally to mislead her enemies. I believe she is throwing down a marker to separate herself from every GOP candidate since Reagan, in effect calling them out for trying to BE President, rather than to USE the Presidency (as did Reagan) to effect positive change. Both Bushes sought the Presidency principally in order to be President, that is: to HOLD the title. Dole and McCain similarly sought it because it was their turn, and they too craved the title. None of the four, card carrying members of the Establishment one and all, had any real agenda or plans to use the power that goes with the title to "make a real difference". They were willing to "go with the flow" in order to hold the title. Similarly, her two principal Establishment challengers--Romney and Perry-- are bereft of any real convictions. One of these two will almost certainly be the nominee should Palin not run. Their records bespeak politicians HUNGRY for a title who are willing to "go with the flow" to get it, whether that flow takes them in the direction of statism (Romney) or crony capitalism (Perry). Palin is unwilling to "go with the flow" to hold a title or for any other reason. Rather, she sees the title as an instrument to CHANGE the flow. Period.

In sum, Palin will not be running for President to hold a title. I think her deep personal humility, as well as her political orientation as a conservative populist, recoils from titles, especially those which are purely honorary. But she has never recoiled from power when there was a crying need that it be held in the hands of a resolute and principled leader. That time, like never before, is now.

To paraphrase the words of an old 1980 campaign commercial, linked below, "The time is now for Palin. Palin for President."

LINK


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: palin; perry; romney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-69 last
To: perfect_rovian_storm

Please no Jeb Bush.


51 posted on 09/29/2011 4:36:43 PM PDT by Qwackertoo (New Day In America November 03, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 3722535r

Up til this point I would agree, and did just a few days ago, but the srasons are changing and the leaves are changing colors fast. Some are already calling her a “tease”. That meme will continue to grow, the longer she goes without announcing, from now on.

Caveat Emptor! ...”

OR: “Don’t it always seem to go..That you don’t know what you’ve qot til it’s gone?”


52 posted on 09/29/2011 4:49:48 PM PDT by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini
No one will take her seriously again, if she does not enter now

You sound like O. "You have to pass this bill now!"

Sarah will enter when Sarah enters. She certainly is not motivated by being hassled.

53 posted on 09/29/2011 4:52:01 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (O assumes the trappings of the presidency, not its mantle. He is not presidential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

“Up til this point I would agree, and did just a few days ago, but the srasons are changing and the leaves are changing colors fast. Some are already calling her a “tease”. That meme will continue to grow, the longer she goes without announcing, from now on”....

I contend that if she announces at any time all of these conversations will be long forgotten....I doubt many will be saying “But she waited too long” or “She’s just a tease”....The momentum will build once she enters.....We’ll see one way or the other soon...I’m one of those Palinbots....I think she will run.....


54 posted on 09/29/2011 5:30:26 PM PDT by 3722535r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
Good analysis. Also, Hillary will be drafted very soon as demonstrated by the media's recent turns on Oblame-o and, in an interview a week ago said she liked her job at State and could not be dragged back into 'politics', so no, she wasn't running.

Knowing how liberals lie, that confirms her running (hubby Prevert is knee-capping Teh One every chance he gets).

So, The Plan is for Hill to contest Sarah for First Woman President and the history that goes with it. Not that Hillary gives a sh*t about the mess this country's in, she just wants that brass ring (title) so BAD!!!!

We're being played, folks and Sarah is in on it (but the real sting will be when she goes all-in-to-win and the cankeled Queen has to sit on the poison apple that'll put her into a deep sleep until a Frog/Prince comes along with his seven midget friends who break that Mirror, mirror, on the wall over her head to wake her up.

Knowing how delusional liberals are, Hillary believes her resume and experience will take her over the top in a contest with Mama Grizzly- or as I like to think of her- the Alaskan Avalanche (tm). If it gets close, her Prevert hubby can have a medical emergency, with well-wishers arriving at the hospital in stained Blue Dresses all. Either way, look for Hill to play the victim card for bonus points (should Bill's condition deteriorate to the point of black demons hauling him away from the light, many extra bonus points would accrue).

55 posted on 09/29/2011 6:01:53 PM PDT by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
Both Bushes sought the Presidency principally in order to be President, that is: to HOLD the title. Dole and McCain similarly sought it because it was their turn, and they too craved the title.

Thank you so much for articulating this for me. Actually though, these were the thoughts I was thinking about Mitt Romney (and to a lesser extent, Perry). To them, it's just another stepping stone, another thing to add to their resume. They may have the fire in their bellies, but they don't have it in their hearts. "Servants Hearts". And that's why I still just believe that Sarah is the best of the lot.

56 posted on 09/29/2011 6:59:30 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Sarah Palin: America's last, best hope for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini
from Wikipedia: On October 3, 1991, Clinton announced that he would run for president

Reagan announced for the presidency on November 13, 1979.

Relax please. As GWB once said, we will respond at the day & time of OUR choosing.

57 posted on 09/29/2011 8:11:01 PM PDT by sklar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


58 posted on 10/08/2011 6:56:38 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

59 posted on 10/08/2011 7:03:38 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

60 posted on 10/09/2011 8:53:19 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Palin is making herself irrelevant.

I have no idea why. But she is.

Get back in the race, or stand aside Palin.


61 posted on 10/09/2011 8:54:49 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

62 posted on 10/09/2011 11:19:03 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

63 posted on 10/09/2011 5:58:12 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

64 posted on 10/23/2011 5:13:08 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

hold


65 posted on 10/30/2011 3:49:32 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

66 posted on 10/30/2011 4:03:15 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

67 posted on 10/30/2011 5:53:35 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

68 posted on 10/30/2011 6:08:56 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

69 posted on 11/06/2011 3:01:13 AM PST by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson