Posted on 10/10/2011 2:00:54 PM PDT by rzman21
I honestly have a real dilemma with Mormonism. From what I have heard and seen, it is a truly weird religion.
On the other hand, every single Mormon I have known has been a really decent person and that includes one relative.
My apologies to publicity hungry retards for lumping you in with Rev. Jeffress.
N00b! IBTZ
Now keep in mind, Obama voters/supporters didn’t have any concern over whatever religion Obama was (and till this day,no one really knows) but we all did know that Obama went to that “Anti-White” church for 20 years.
Romney may have not been the top choice for most republicans/conservatives over the last four years,but being Christie,and Mitch Daniels aren’t running,we will support Romney and Cain to the very end and will support either version of a Romney/Cain/Rubio ticket.
This keeps up, I'm gonna have to write the exposure of Milt for readers to contemplate. Mormonism is not Christian or Christianity. But from a religion perspective, Milt being a Mormon is not his biggest problem.
Speak for yourself Noob, no good conservative wants Romney, so quit using the term “we” when you post your opinions!
How out of the loop are you, Rubio??? Ok, now you can go back to DU!
I wouldn’t support Romney for anything, and I have worked for virtually every GOP candidate for the last 20 years, even when I thought they were total losers and even when I actively disliked them (McCain). I did this because I thought that even if they weren’t very good and were way too old for the job (Dole, McCain), they were such losers that somebody else would manage them and they might make good Supreme Court appointments or other things that didn’t require a lot of energy.
However, Romney is an active RINO, the only 100% RINO candidate we have, and he’s the only one I would simply not work for, nor would I vote for him. He he would be just a white version of Obama, even if Cain runs interference for him to get blacks to vote for him.
And the fact that he’s a Mormon, member of a flaky theocratic cult that had to be suppressed by the US Army so it wouldn’t keep on killing people, sure doesn’t endear him to me either. I doubt that anybody who knows anything about Mormonism would vote for a Mormon.
romney’s mormonism isn’t a problem for the dems or the GOP right now. however should he be the nominee I guarantee he’ll be hit with it in such a vile manner that would make the treatment given to Sarah Palin pale in comparison.
Can you imagine that if Mittens is the nominee and the state-run media runs a media blitz on Mormonism just before the election. Most independents and a large percentage of evangelicals don’t know that Mittens expects to become a “god” with his own planet where people will worship him. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg of the blasphemy, heresy and apostasy of Mormonism. The dims are salivating at the prospect of a Romney nomination. The stupid party will fall for the trap and pull defeat out of the jaws of victory. Beam me up, Scotty.
These are pretty big rocks ahead if the GOP establishment continues on this path, enough rocks to get Obama re-elected.
So a question for Mitt is if he would accept blood transfusions if as President he needed them in a life saving situation.
Choose between Obama and Romney.
Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t accept blood transfusions, Mormons do.
I could never vote for Romney but it has nothing to do with his being a Mormon.
Romney isn’t even a good Mormon if you look at his stand on abortion and then think of it in terms of eternal progression in Mormonism. How can Mittens reconcile it? How do Mormons that support him reconcile it? It must be money to the LDS Church that gains him favor.
When I look at Mittens, Dingy Harry and Huntsman my vision of the conservative Mormon flies out the window.
I don’t care about his “Mormonism” it’s his confusion about the Bill of Rights that troubles me!
Of all the reasons to dislike Romney, mormonism is not even on my list, to be honest.
Mormons don't believe in blood transfusions? I thought that was the Jehovah's Witnesses. I guess it could be both.
I'm guessing he would. But I don't know. Don't care. I think his policies are the issue and those what we should focus our attention on. Everything else is a distraction. In this case, the distraction serves a dual purpose. To divide Republicans but also make us look like bigots.
Liberals have no qualms about standing up for Christian values when it serves their purpose. And, trust me, if they can tarnish us by saying Romney lost the nomination because of our religious bigotry, you better bet your bottom dollar they would shout that from the mountaintops.
Hallelujah! Can I get an Amen!?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.