Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JustiaGate
The Examiner ^ | 10-20-2011 | Dianna Cotter

Posted on 10/20/2011 1:12:42 PM PDT by Danae

Someone was incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1's natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent.  In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a "native or natural-born citizen" as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain. 

In June 2008 no one was discussing Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162 (1875) with regard to Obama. In fact, those who were discussing the then Senator’s citizenship status had focused instead on his birth in Hawaii in a attempt to prove the future president was not born in the United States despite publication of the Senator’s short form computer generated Birth Certificate. It would not be until October of 2008 that Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility would be questioned as to his status as a dual citizen at the time of his birth.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barrydunham; birthcertificate; certifigate; elections; fraud; happersett; illegal; ineligible; justia; justiagate; minor; minorvhappersett; naturalborncitizen; obama; romancinghistory; scotus; soetoro; srnotacitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-289 next last
To: Semper911
Oh I am just SURE that it is yet another in the long line of conspiracies. You know, the ones that have the Hawaii DOH as co-conspirators and yet put out a document that is easily identified as a forgery!

Some people will believe almost anything apparently.

They could apparently also simultaneously believe the Treasury Department would conspire with 0bama to print fake money AND that the money printed from the Treasury presses would be an easily discerned counterfeit!

Yep, a vast conspiracy is OBVIOUSLY the ONLY reasonable answer! /s

201 posted on 10/21/2011 11:29:55 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

You cannot change the Constitution with a statute. 1790 is just like the resolution saying McCain was eligible, and that is worthless.


202 posted on 10/21/2011 11:37:32 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

The 14th amendment unquestionably created a third, loophole citizenship category without any allegiance that SCOTUS later named “Native Born.”

It has not been decided if children of illegal aliens and born in the USA are in fact US citizens, it has been interpreted that way but not decided by the USSC.


203 posted on 10/21/2011 11:40:26 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Indeed you cannot - but Congress has the power given by the Constitution to form universal laws of naturalization - those that are natural born are not required to be naturalized.

But all Constitutional issues aside - whether the law is Constitutionally correct or not is immaterial to the fact that it shows the understanding of the term during the time of our founding most certainly did NOT entail born of citizen parents in the USA if one citizen parent (father) and being born overseas was acceptable criteria to be deemed a natural born citizen - and thus with no need to be naturalized and eligible for the Presidency.

204 posted on 10/21/2011 11:45:10 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

...But all Constitutional issues aside - whether the law is Constitutionally correct or not is immaterial to the fact that it shows the understanding of the term during the time of our founding most certainly did NOT entail born of citizen parents in the USA if one citizen parent (father) and being born overseas was acceptable criteria to be deemed a natural born citizen - and thus with no need to be naturalized and eligible for the Presidency....

You are making a supposition. You cannot read their minds. Show me some documentation. It is just as likely they tried to expand the meaning to include persons that were not included in the NBC accepted definition.

Which of our founders had children born overseas or were likely to have such while they were working for the govt and may have desired to make them eligible?


205 posted on 10/21/2011 11:52:37 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Indeed, the 2008 election exposed widespread ignorance on what it means to be a natural born citizens, particularly among the entire voting body. That maternal descent is respected today doesn’t discount the idea that both parents should be citizens. The biggest misconception is that you can be born to NO U.S. citizen parents and be natural-born.


206 posted on 10/21/2011 11:57:21 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

It isn’t a conspiracy. Go plug the URLs into the waybackmachine for yourself and see. You can SEE where the references were scrubbed and the case numbers changed. Its all right there.

How is THAT a conspiracy? Someone altered SCOTUS cases at Justia.com. Thats a FACT.


207 posted on 10/21/2011 12:02:59 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Great comment and I agree 100% and a huge BTTT for the article!


208 posted on 10/21/2011 12:05:54 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: edge919
Indeed, I may have been conned. The 1790 Act does NOT say that only the father must be a citizen for a child born abroad to be considered as a natural-born citizen:
And be it further enacted, that the children of persons duly naturalized, dwelling within the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years, at the time of such naturalization, and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident of the United States:

209 posted on 10/21/2011 12:23:16 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Some people will believe almost anything apparently.

So true. You believe that a person born in the US of a citizen mother and a non-citizen father is a natural born citizen.

I mentioned the scrubbed files because that is the topic of the thread. And your response, ridicule, is the same as all the other rebuttals that have been presented on this issue. No facts, no case law, no expert legal opinion, no evidence, just ridicule.

At least you are not alone -- the MSM joins you in that game. And Alinsky would be proud. Nice work.

210 posted on 10/21/2011 12:23:46 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Anti-birthers or whatever they are use the word “conspiracy” as though it means “a fantasy that gullible people believe in that doesn’t exist”.

That’s not the meaning of the word at all, here are some definitions of the word “conspiracy”:

(Just did a search using “conspiracy definition”)

con·spir·a·cy

1.
the act of conspiring.
2.
an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3.
a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4.
Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
5.
any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

con·spir·a·cy
1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design

conspiracy

1. a secret plan or agreement to carry out an illegal or harmful act, esp with political motivation; plot
2. the act of making such plans in secret


Now this next reference is especially interesting as it is a legal definition, there is more at the link but I posted the most relevant. By all the definions here, there was and is a large conspiracy. These fools are trying to throw poo like monkeys at a zoo; unfortunately their use of the word “conspiracy” is actually apropos and quite accurate. Actually the crimes committed go much, much further than mere conspiracy.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/conspiracy

An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself but becomes unlawful when done by the combination of actors.

Conspiracy is governed by statute in federal courts and most state courts. Before its Codification in state and federal statutes, the crime of conspiracy was simply an agreement to engage in an unlawful act with the intent to carry out the act. Federal statutes, and many state statutes, now require not only agreement and intent but also the commission of an Overt Act in furtherance of the agreement.

****Note this section below****

Conspiracy is a crime separate from the criminal act for which it is developed. For example, one who conspires with another to commit Burglary and in fact commits the burglary can be charged with both conspiracy to commit burglary and burglary.

Conspiracy is an inchoate, or preparatory, crime. It is similar to solicitation in that both crimes are committed by manifesting an intent to engage in a criminal act. It differs from solicitation in that conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons, whereas solicitation can be committed by one person alone.

Conspiracy also resembles attempt. However, attempt, like solicitation, can be committed by a single person. On another level, conspiracy requires less than attempt. A conspiracy may exist before a crime is actually attempted, whereas no attempt charge will succeed unless the requisite attempt is made.

****Note this section below****

The law seeks to punish conspiracy as a substantive crime separate from the intended crime because when two or more persons agree to commit a crime, the potential for criminal activity increases, and as a result, the danger to the public increases. Therefore, the very act of an agreement with criminal intent (along with an overt act, where required) is considered sufficiently dangerous to warrant charging conspiracy as an offense separate from the intended crime.

According to some criminal-law experts, the concept of conspiracy is too elastic, and the allegation of conspiracy is used by prosecutors as a superfluous criminal charge. Many criminal defense lawyers maintain that conspiracy is often expanded beyond reasonable interpretations. In any case, prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys alike agree that conspiracy cases are usually amorphous and complex.

< snip >

Other Considerations

****Very interesting stuff here too!****’

A conspiracy exists as long as measures are taken to conceal evidence of the crime. A person who did not participate in the original agreement can become a coconspirator after the actual criminal act if the person joins in the concealment of the conspiracy. Whether a coconspirator received personal benefit or profit is of no importance.

Generally, conspirators are liable for all crimes committed within the course or scope of the conspiracy. The application of this general rule varies from state to state. Ordinarily, an act is within the course or scope of the conspiracy if it is a foreseeable result of the agreement. In some states, a conspirator is not liable where he or she has no knowledge of the specific act and argues successfully that the act was beyond the scope of the conspiracy. Also, if the purpose of the agreement is later changed by coconspirators, a conspirator who did not participate in the alteration may not be held liable for the new conspiracy. A person is liable for conspiracy only in regard to the meaning of the agreement as he or she understands it.

In some jurisdictions, a person may be guilty of conspiracy even if a coconspirator is immune from prosecution. For example, if two persons conspire to commit murder and one is found to have been insane at the time of the killing, the other conspirator may not be exempt from prosecution for conspiracy.

One who provides services to conspirators will not be guilty of conspiracy if that person has not participated in the agreement and does not know that a conspiracy exists. There must be a willful participation in the conspiracy, as well as an intent to further the common purpose or design for conspiratorial liability. Therefore, aiding a conspiracy by selling material to further it does not make someone a conspirator if the person does not know of the conspiracy, even if that person knows the goods sold will be used for an unlawful purpose. However, if the circumstances indicate a conspiracy, one who cooperates and knowingly sells goods for illegal use may be guilty of conspiracy.

Generally, if a number of conspirators agree to carry out different functions in furtherance of the conspiracy, the agreement constitutes a single conspiracy. This is so even if the different functions amount to more than one unlawful purpose. In some states, however, the different functions may constitute multiple conspiracies if there is an agreement to commit more than one crime.

Punishment for the crime of conspiracy is ordinarily defined by statute and varies in accordance with the conspiracy’s objective. For example, a conspiracy to commit a misdemeanor will not be subject to the same punishment as a conspiracy to commit a felony. Conspiracy may be alleged in a civil case if the plaintiff has suffered an injury as a result of the conspiracy. Civil conspiracy is ordinarily not a Cause of Action, but the existence of a conspiracy may be used in determining the amount of damages in a civil action and the respective liabilities of civil codefendants for the payment of damages.


211 posted on 10/21/2011 12:48:22 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Thanks for the post. BTTT.


212 posted on 10/21/2011 12:51:42 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

True enough.

If everyone involved were caught and held accountable, it would be a lot of people. Barry should be at the top of the list.

Good Lord... and they thought NIXON was bad!!!!!!


213 posted on 10/21/2011 1:09:00 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
We need to:

Photobucket
214 posted on 10/21/2011 1:12:29 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

You are misreading what I posted.

I was not in any way addressing the children born to illegals. Those cannot possibly be citizens, since they are a part of an invading force, and cannot be said to be here under US jurisdiction.


215 posted on 10/21/2011 1:37:20 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Danae

That is excellent!

Have you send your article and Donofrio’s around to the usual suspects? I have ideas (not that they’re any good, mind you).


216 posted on 10/21/2011 1:42:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Danae

I know you are not in the speculation buisness but would I be out of line to ask you to speculate on who had the precience, prior to Obamas announcement to run, who knew Stanley well enough or could coerce or buy off Stanley to take a risk of 25 year prison-time, to subvert supreme court findings. Only a few names could come to mind given the timeframe reference. These would be Chicago politicians and political operatives. Did Stanley come into some money at that time. Why would this not enrage every lawyer, right or left, who is faithful to the Constitution and the law? Is there any way a cause can be brought against him to allow discovery? And if this subverted the political process and electoral process is not the fruit poisoned derived from that tree and all eminations from that point forward in time? This is treachery in its rankest form? How can this not become a topic of a Congressional inquiry...is that going too far, given Congress investigates baseball players taking anabolic steroids. This is in character for Obamaites but it should not be allowed to stand.


217 posted on 10/21/2011 1:54:24 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (I ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Send it everywhere whichway!


218 posted on 10/21/2011 1:56:08 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

I know this much, Stanley sold FindLaw to West Publishing for 37 million and a 200K salary. He didn’t get along with them so well, got sued for breach of contract by them and settled. He started Justia after that.
It SHOULD enrage EVERYONE. The trouble is getting it into the media.

If people knew.. yea, there would be some serious ramifications.


219 posted on 10/21/2011 2:01:49 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Just sent you a freepmail.


220 posted on 10/21/2011 2:16:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Axlerod keeps repeating in my mind. He is not a lawyer, I don't think. Obama himself?????Too ignorant.....Who got in behind obama very early on and set his candidacy in motion. Who benefits....obama...He would have to not leave fingerprints behind......It had to be someone close in his posse....or a devotee....but there were no devotees when he was a state senator...or even a senator....it keeps coming up a close confidant of obama......Michelle is not top shelf enough to hatch such a plan......Axlerod....is the name I keep coming up with.....how could he know about this case....obama.....

Can you help me here Dianna? That cadre had to be very, very tight and exclusive. And they had to be willing to destroy law and the Constitution. They must have taken warm showers together to convince each other that this must be done to get him elected..... and plausible deniability.....It keeps coming up Axlerod.

221 posted on 10/21/2011 2:16:44 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (I ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

Here is the article: http://www.abajournal.com/legalrebels/article/tim_stanley_big_giver/


222 posted on 10/21/2011 2:16:44 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

http://www.abajournal.com/legalrebels/article/tim_stanley_big_giver/

Posted Oct 20, 2009 10:00 AM CDT
By Stephanie Francis Ward

Email
Print
Reprints

Tim Stanley

When talking to Timothy J. Stanley, one gets the impression from the FindLaw founder that making no money from legal information websites could be the best approach. Stanley, a former computer programmer, started putting legal documents online in the early 1990s, when many associated the Internet with sex, scams or both.

Working with his wife, Stacy Stern, and technologist Martin Roscheisen, he assembled an interface that tied free legal sites together. For the most part, what was available then came from law schools and various legal conferences that listed program materials online. They called it FindLaw.

The trio sold FindLaw to West Group in 2001. The sale price was $37 million, according to the National Law Journal, with Stanley staying on at an annual base salary of $200,000. Later the relationship soured, and according to a lawsuit filed against Stanley in U.S. District Court in Minnesota over a noncompete agreement, he was fired by the legal publishing group in April 2003. The case, West Publishing Corp. v. Stanley, eventually settled.

“It was a disaster working for West,” Stanley says. “I’ll just leave it there.”

Also in April 2003 he started Justia.com, which operates much like what he had in mind for FindLaw, but better, according to fellow public domain advocates. (Justia powers the blawg search function on ABAJournal.com.)

Justia.com, based in Mountain View, Calif., makes money designing webpages for law firms. Those profits cover the site’s free information, which includes an expert-witness directory, overviews of federal law organized by practice area and various case documents.

“Probably the reason we can do it is because none of us can ever make money off of it,” Stanley says. “If you look at it from a business standpoint, we get karma credit.”

When his employees tell their families about work, Stanley adds, they brag about the public domain projects rather than building law firm websites.

“It’s a business—we’re certainly not communists or anything like that—but we more or less try to do whatever free-information projects we want,” he says, “stuff that other people aren’t quite doing yet.”

Hear Tim Stanley talk about the role Justia will play with free online case summaries and documents, and how lawyers will help.

Future Justia projects include building a bigger library of case summaries with an annotation system. That information comes from states, law schools and various legal blogs. The site now offers profiles of lawyers, and Stanley envisions linking some lawyer-authored case summaries to the authors’ profiles for marketing purposes.

“We’re really going to start pushing out higher-value annotations and share them with everybody,” says Stanley, 45. “Well, maybe not with Lexis or Westlaw, but all the free people.”

“It will be good for nonlawyers, too, who’ve never used Lexis or Westlaw, to have access to cases for free,” he says. “There’s a lot more interest out there than people give credit for.”

Stanley’s also thinking about adding judicial profiles in which lawyers could comment in a way he calls “truly anonymous.” Lawyers who partake in sharing free information—by using tools like Twitter or by submitting case summaries—could beef up their profiles with badges showing their work and get higher spots in search engines.

Thomas R. Bruce, director of Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute (and another Legal Rebel) has known Stanley for years. According to Bruce, Stanley thinks the best business development plan is walking up to someone and asking how he can help.

“I think Tim genuinely believes that people need better access to the legal system, and he doesn’t limit that belief to people who have traditionally been perceived as underserved by the legal system because they are indigent and having some kind of traumatic problem,” Bruce says. “It’s much more: ‘Everybody needs this.’

“It’s a bit like health care—you’re as likely to be underserved and bankrupt by the whole process if you’re solidly middle class.”

While Stanley doesn’t see himself as a communist, some say he’s a hippie in a Silicon Valley way. He usually wears jeans and long-sleeved T-shirts, and his e-mail signature includes “World peace—good idea.”

Stanley wrote most of the original code for FindLaw. Friends say that as the Internet bubble inflated, it wasn’t unusual for him to sleep under his desk. Now Stanley’s usually in the office by 6 a.m., and he goes home around 8 p.m. He exercises before and after work. He also serves on the boards of various public domain groups like Public.Resource.org, American LegalNet Inc. and Nolo.

Stanley often exchanges pet pictures (he has two beloved pugs) with public domain comrades like Jerry Goldman of the Oyez Project. Goldman, a Northwestern University political science professor, started his multimedia website in the 1990s and initially didn’t have a single focus. Stanley advised that a U.S. Supreme Court bent would make the Oyez site the most useful.

Goldman took his advice, and today the site offers audio of Supreme Court proceedings dating back to 1955. In 2003 it won a major grant from the National Science Foundation.

“The fact we can provide audio to all these cases is a testament to the value of the vision I had, but it was incomplete,” Goldman says. “Tim helped me realize what I needed to see.”

Last updated Oct. 23 to quote the NLJ’s reported sale price of FindLaw to West; and to note that Stanley’s reported salary was a base level.


223 posted on 10/21/2011 2:18:01 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Very interesting findings. Will it have legs is yet to be seen.


224 posted on 10/21/2011 2:20:28 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter
plug this name in. Bob Bauer. Perkins Coie. Former White House Council. Obama Confidant.

That guy knows everything about all the birther cases because he represented Obama in them. His wife also worked at the White House.

I can't connect those dots. If I could connect Bauer and Stanley to the scrubbing at Justia DIRECTLY I would have a Pulitzer.

225 posted on 10/21/2011 2:34:50 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Danae
If I could connect Bauer and Stanley to the scrubbing at Justia DIRECTLY I would have a Pulitzer.

It ain't over -- you're just getting warmed up!

Put me on your ping list if you have one. I'll keep checking for your work on the Examiner.

226 posted on 10/21/2011 3:31:25 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Related article just up:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2796032/posts?page=8#8

People are already calling Donofrio an idiot - I guess they don’t like the truth he and Danae have figured out. It’s like saying you don’t trust any of your mail because the mailman is funny looking or has a bad habit or something.


227 posted on 10/21/2011 3:47:46 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Thanks, I read it at Leo’s site. People who call Leo an idiot haven’t read his research.


228 posted on 10/21/2011 4:15:43 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
I guess he wears funny clothes or something. They obviously don't like what he and Danae discovered. Notice they're too chicks*** to dis her to her face, though. If Donofrio's wrong, then she is too. They just don't like the truth, it's clear as day.
229 posted on 10/21/2011 6:13:11 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Vickery2010

That might be it. When did she say that?


230 posted on 10/21/2011 8:03:33 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
Seriously, we’ve been had, and a successful Marxist coup on the Office of President of the United States of America has occurred.

I am sure that there are things (moral at this point) that go through the minds of many of us that we are wise not to print.

231 posted on 10/21/2011 8:36:53 PM PDT by Bellflower (Judas Iscariot, first democrat, robber, held the money bag, claimed to care for poor: John 12:4-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
It has not been decided if children of illegal aliens and born in the USA are in fact US citizens, it has been interpreted that way but not decided by the USSC.

It has only been interpreted as such since (incorrectly) the 1980s, and only as an administrative ruling, never as a court case or as legislation.

Anchor babies are not US citizens. It would be like me giving you a vehicle owned by some third party. Saying it is yours does not make it so. Saying it was mine to give does not make it so.

232 posted on 10/21/2011 9:03:29 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone; Danae

We are dealing with a determined and well-trained adversary. We must act accordingly.


233 posted on 10/21/2011 9:12:57 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

>


234 posted on 10/21/2011 9:13:57 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Danae

”This class of citizen has no other possible citizenship.”

This.
Threadwinner, right there.


235 posted on 10/21/2011 9:27:52 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (Obama: He's "Too Black to Fail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

From Minor vs Happersett:

“Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.”

Even basic citizenship was being called into question here regarding those born “without reference to the citizenship of their parents”, let alone an opinion being made allowing for natural born citizenship status to those not born of US citizen parents, emphasis on the plural.

When determining the eligibility for the highest office in the land, you want the highest degree in confidence in the citizenship (and presumed attendant lack of divided loyalties) to country to be found in a citizen who is such because of their birth to people who are themselves citizens of the same nation.

Logically speaking, this isn’t hard, folks, and Minor vs Happersett addresses it pretty clearly, from where I’m sitting.


236 posted on 10/21/2011 10:38:40 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (Obama: He's "Too Black to Fail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

bttt
needs repeating:
This is huge and still in action. Please, everyone, email this to everybody and anyone you can think of to email it to. This cannot get buried. Freepers have the power to make something like this a big news story, as well it should be, if we work together. We must ping this idea of sending out emails to as many news origination and personalities as possible. Let’s Flood Them and keep it coming!!!!


237 posted on 10/21/2011 10:55:40 PM PDT by Bellflower (Judas Iscariot, first democrat, robber, held the money bag, claimed to care for poor: John 12:4-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth; SandRat; BIGLOOK; Syncro; Jim Robinson; kristinn; trooprally; buford; ...

OMG .. wow! Just found this:

http://a12iggymom.wordpress.com/2011/10/10/111111-march-on-washington/

(March On Washington - Veterans Day - Nov. 11. 2011)

Excerpt:

This is a NATIONWIDE Call-to-Action!

“We are Facing a Battle That Will Decide our Fate as a Nation

!” – Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely (Ret.)

The time to unite and fight for the American way of life has arrived…

We did not choose this fight, or this time. The fight has come to us in our time and we will not shrink from our responsibility to protect and defend the United States of America, our Constitutional Republic, and the American way of life. We

CALL upon ALL freedom loving Americans to JOIN US in this honorable endeavor. We do so on the following basis…
Abuses and Usurpations

Barack Obama’s once strong approval rating now stands at only 19%. The approval rating of congress is no better.

The people have lost all faith in their government… The demise of our Constitutional Republic has been underway for nearly a hundred years. As the people placidly accepted intolerable offenses against the republic, the states, and the Constitution for decades, the Central power in Washington D.C. grew ever more powerful, ever more abusive, and ever more disconnected from the very people it was formed to represent.

During the last three years, the current administration has committed the most egregious offenses against
the people, the states and the Constitution, since the founding of our country and today, they operate as a
virtual dictatorship, against the governed, beyond the scope and authority the people granted them in the
Constitution and at odds with the will of the vast majority of American citizens.

The actions of the Obama Administration in total, rise to the level of treason against the United States and
its people.

The Democratic Socialists of America are currently running Washington D.C. and they recently issued this statement in a Call-to-Action for their millions of members

“We are the alternative to the tea party conservatives, the Republicans whose only program is to say no, the Democrats who have forgotten what progressive politics really are and the progressives who think that they can stand apart from the left.

”This must not be permitted to stand…

Among other offenses, abuses and usurpations, is the following list of transgressions – (detailed in
Appendix A) – altering our constitutional form of government and system of justice without authority…

Violations against Article I of the U.S. Constitution – Congress

Violations against Article II of the U.S. Constitution – The office of President

Violations against Article III of the U.S. Constitution – Judicial Powers

Violations against Article IV of the U.S. Constitution – The State

~~~~~~~~~

Also here

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/05/a-declaration-to-restore-the-constitutional-republic/


238 posted on 10/21/2011 11:02:33 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Vickery2010; Danae; All

For whatever it’s worth - African Press Int’l (AP or API)

~~~~~

Excerpt:

The African Press International got under Michelle Obama’s skin and she came out swinging – bribing, actually. She offered API an invite to the inauguration, in exchange for a “good” story about her husband:

African press International is supposed to support Africans and African-American view,” and she went to state that, “it is strange that API has chosen to support the racists against my husband. There is no shame in being adopted by a step father.

All dirt has been thrown onto my husband’s face and yet he loves this country. My husband and I know that there is no law that will stop him from becoming the president, just because some American white racists are bringing up the issue of my husband’s adoption by His step father.

The important thing here is where my husband’s heart is at the moment. I can tell the American people that My husband loves this country and his adoption never changed his love for this country. He was born in Hawaii, yes, and that gives him all the right to be an American citizen even though he was adopted by a foreigner; says Michelle Obama on telefon to API.

http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/10/15/michelle-obama-to-african-press-bribes-and-no-law-will-stop-my-husband/


239 posted on 10/21/2011 11:16:09 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; Jean S

OMG.

Don’t EVEN go there! API was pushed here by me, I totally bought into that site. It was BUNK. Total BS’er is Sammy Scammy. That whole story was total Bull. Don’t buy it for a second. Good LORD I sound like mountain Sage.... oh someone put me out of my damn misery......

Seriously, take it from me, African Press International is not even up the the standards of The National Inquirer. Or pick your UFO tabloid, it isn’t even that credible. Tell Stop the ACLU, whoever they are, not to believe a darned thing that ever comes from African Press International. Just ask JeanS.


240 posted on 10/21/2011 11:28:35 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

“...but we seem to be powerless in this country.”


Agreed. Sometimes I feel like I am living in Venezuela? or 1984? :(


241 posted on 10/21/2011 11:29:43 PM PDT by bushwon ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait till it is free"--PJ O'rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Wonder if Levin would find this scrubbing and then reappearance interesting—he is with Landmark Legal...


242 posted on 10/21/2011 11:34:39 PM PDT by bushwon ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait till it is free"--PJ O'rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Danae; Vickery2010

LOL ... I KNOW! That’s why I said “for whatever it’s worth” .. but that’s where the MO quote vickery posted came up in search.


243 posted on 10/21/2011 11:40:21 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

HOLY MOSES!

FROM THE POST & E-MAIL WEBSITE:

APPENDIX “A”

As a preface to APPENDIX “A”, the following items only scratch the surface. The blatant abrogation of the United States Constitution, trampling the boundaries of law-based authority, deceit, bribery, aiding and abetting our sworn enemies, illegal manipulation of our election process and subverting election laws, and hundreds of other affronts and assaults to our liberties and freedoms, all fall under the category of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

1. Obama is a National Security threat since he definitely has questionable allegiance to the United States, not to mention his refusal to complete and release full, frank and truthful answers as to who he is. Obama has demonstrated a blatant disregard for the public safety and security.

2. Obama and his handlers released an obvious forged birth certificate after release at least two fraudulent COLBs (Certifications of Live Birth). Obama is also using numerous stolen Social Security numbers.

3. Obama and his incompetent advisors have wreaked economic tyranny on the American people, all the while calling for the rest of us to endure economic sacrifice.

4. Obama has destroyed accepted administrative process by creating 32 Czars who only report to him, bypassing the Congress and Cabinet. *

5. In one year, Obama and his minions doubled our national debt, which took 200 years to accumulate.

6. Obama and his Justice Department sided with a foreign government (Mexico) when they sued the State of Arizona in order to force the continuation of illegal immigration. *

7. Obama and his henchmen proposed a 1% tax on all bank transactions (HR4646) to be implemented after the November 2012 elections.

8. Obama signed HB1388 to use $20 million in taxpayer money to immigrate Hamas refugees to USA, and other migration assistance to Palestinian refugees.

9. Obama passed “Dream Act” by Executive Order which aide’s illegal aliens through “prosecutorial discretion” all to garner votes for his election. The Heritage Foundation has provided extensive proof that illegal aliens and immigrants with green cards are committing rampant voter fraud. *

10. Obama’s socialist, radical, dictatorial Moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, for thirty years a major source of energy for America, and which a Federal Court ruled was unconstitutional, continues to prevent drilling, all under the pretense to protect the environment and the fraudulent notion of global warming. He is indifferent to the loss of 10,000 jobs and 87,000 workers destroyed. Perfect excuse to push “Cap and Trade” with environmental regulations, and to push for governmental control of energy industries, i.e. General Motors, banking and healthcare.

11. Obama and his Czars want to tax church contributions and replace charities with government welfare. *

12. This administrations massive expansion of the federal government (350,000 employees) through agencies and Czars, whose goal is to “fundamentally transform America.”

13. Obama’s own Federal Elections Commission documented that he got at least $33.8 million from disallowed foreign contributions, including 520 contributions from interests in Iran, and $30,000 from Hamas-controlled Gaza area. *

14. Obama said, “We must reward our friends and punish our enemies.” 70 individuals who raised $50,000 or more for him “have been rewarded with ambassadorships or high ranking jobs.”

15. Obama and the cabal’s National Security Strategy released in May, allows for the targeted assassination of US citizens including “homegrown terrorists” without due process. *

16. Obama dhimmitude given Ramadan and Iftar dinners in the White House, while he cancels the National Day of Prayer without one word of objection from the Congress.

17. Obama and his Muslim buddies agree and defend a 15 story mosque, bankrolled by terrorist sympathizers and anti-American Muslim groups, to be erected feet from the hallowed ground of the World Trade Center.

18. Obama and his Justice Department’s refusal to support, defend and enforce US law, i.e. Defense of Marriage Act, stating it was unconstitutional, thereby circumventing established law and the rulings of the courts. *

19. Obama and his warmongers attack Libya without any authority from Congress. *

20. ObamaCare ruled unconstitutional and ordered stopped by the Federal Court…it was implemented regardless of the Federal Court. *

21. Congress said Cap and Trade was unconstitutional and refused to pass the same. Obama ordered the EPA to enact the provisions regardless of the Congressional ruling. *

22. Obama’s use of taxpayer money to pay for Democrat propaganda including $15 million for The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act road signs and $18 million for the continually misleading recovery.gov website. *

23. $770 million of taxpayer funds given to Egypt and Cyprus for the restoration of mosques through USAID. *

24. Obama has disgraced the United States by bowing to foreign potentates, while at the same time snubbed our longtime allies, Great Britain and Israel. Obama and his friends have deliberately fostered hate against the Jews and Israel by promoting a Palestinian State.

25. Obama’s Department of Justice refusing to prosecute Black Panthers in Philadelphia caught on tape brandishing weapons in front of a voting site to intimidate voters. Further the stated intentions of political appointees of Obama who said they would ignore voter crimes committed by blacks, Latinos and other minorities. *

26. Obama and his Cabinet intentionally refusing to secure our nation’s borders is in direct violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution. This is an effort to blackmail Republican support for comprehensive immigration reform. They are in essence holding the Border States and residents as political hostages during a time when they live in fear and danger. *

27. Obama and his handlers continually ignore Congress’s constitutional obligation to vet presidential appointees, as none of his 32 Czars was vetted by Congress, and his appointment of the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was appointed during Congress recess. *

28. Department of Homeland Security now investigating to determine the political association for those making Freedom of Information Act Requests. If you are a Republican you request will be delayed and even ignored altogether.

29. Obama’s Justice Department refusing to sue sanctuary cities for violating US immigration law. *

30. Obama’s executive order which allows Interpol to operate in the US with no restraints, and without any oversight from Congress, courts, FBI or local law enforcement. *

31. Obama’s administration and Justice Department discourage whistleblowers and prosecute them.

32. Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton’s ongoing effort to create international small arms accords that will subvert the Second Amendment rights of US citizens.

33. Obama and his State Department has failed to treat as an Act of War the takeover of sovereign land belonging to Arizona by the Mexican drug cartel.

34. The State Department used $23 million in taxpayer money to transform Kenya into a constitutionally communist country where freedom of speech is limited and property rights are based on social justice. Don’t forget the Kenyan constitution allows for Sharia Law in some regions, which means women will not have basic human rights. *

35. As part of the auto industry bailout and forced closings, shut down an unbelievable disproportionate number of dealerships in rural areas that did not vote for Obama.

36. Obama’s refusal to have a press conference and answer the difficult questions as is expected by every US President. And as is usual with his total lack of respect for anyone but himself…he is always late for everything.

37. Obama and his minions have downgraded the value of human life with their opposition to his signing “Born Alive Infants Protection Act”; however they lifted the ban on overseas abortion funding using US taxpayer’s money.

38. Obama’s State Department foreign policy continually will do anything to insult our allies, embarrass the United States, all the while elevating and promoting third world Muslim countries. *

39. Obama and his environmentalist henchmen are prohibiting US industries from taking advantage of our own natural resources including coal, oil, uranium and timber. *

40. Despite all the political rhetoric about the historical downgrade of our nation’s credit rating, the devaluation was a mere shadow of the colossal degradation Obama and his socialist cadres have inflicted on our Country since January 20, 2009. More significant than our nation’s credit, our nation’s credibility as a constitutional republic has suffered relentless and ruthless damage and offense. *

41. Obama deployed 1200 National Guard troops to Border States, where they will, under no circumstances, be used to stop the flow of illegal aliens and drug traffickers.

42. Despite a court’s ruling and Congress’s opposition, Obama’s FCC continues to try to gain control over the Internet, by reclassifying internet companies as telecommunications providers, thereby making them subject to FCC regulation. *

43. A slick move no one noticed moving the Census Bureau out of the Commerce Department directly into the White House and under the control and management of Rahm Emmanuel, Chief of Staff.

44. Obama attempts to run this Country with Executive Orders.

45. Under the cover of secrecy and without any input from Congress, state or local officials and current land owners, the Department of the Interior plans to take control of millions of public and private lands in Western states by designating them national monuments.

46. Obama through Eric Holder has handcuffed and taken over the CIA, which has been the most critical, independent information gathering resource safe-guarding our national security. Obama has revealed, ridiculed and condemned CIA interrogation methods which were previously approved by Congress and cleared through the Justice Department. He has demonstrated to our enemies (terrorists) that they need not fear us. *

47. Obama’s known history is replete with symbiotic associations and participation with admitted anti-American radicals, many of which/who advocate the destruction of American imperialism and capitalism, even though violent means. Consider William Ayers, Khalid Al Mansour, Rhashid Khalidi, Jeremiah Wright, Sol Alinsky, James Cone, Mike Klonsky, as well as organizations such as the Weather Underground, STORM, Chicago Annenberg Challenge, Woods Foundation, ACORN, which have all received major tax payer funded support. Obama has never denied or even argued about his nefarious involvement with these people and organizations.

48. At the expense of the American taxpayer to the tune of $6 Billion, Obama and his handlers have established their own Civilian Paramilitary Security Force made up with the likes of SEIU, STORM, ACORN, RUCKUS, The Apollo Project (Soros), AmeriCorps, Color of Change, Drummond Pike/Project and others who choose to remain anonymous. *

49. Loss of free speech to the tune of half a billion dollars of taxpayer money, given to Obama appointee Mark Lloyd “FCC Diversity Officer”, and avowed pro-Chavez radical, ordered by Obama to rein in free speech on the airwaves by reorganizing the FCC and placing a tax equal to annual operating costs on local radio stations, which they either pay or lose their license to a new minority owner. *

50. Historic and unprecedented move by Obama’s cabal to indoctrinate our children in socialist, humanist garbage, sent a video to all schools, and naturally this scheme was promoted by the NEA, with the children taking a pledge, “…to be a servant to our president and to all mankind”, and then they chant over and over “together we can.” He is asking our children to choose him and his agenda, over anything you might teach at home. *

51. Obama’s appointment of Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings, founder of Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network, has determined required reading material for our schools which promotes pornography, not to mention homosexuality. This information is so massive, if you type into Google, Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the classroom-Kevin Jennings and the GLSEN Reading List, click on the first site, you can read it for yourself…be prepared to vomit. *

52. Obama protected union interests over those of GM and Chrysler bond holders during bankruptcy proceedings, forcing investors to accept millions in losses, funds which they were legally entitled to. *

53. In a time when Americans are asked to sacrifice, I guess this does not apply to Michelle Obama, since she has 22 personal assistants, which does not include a markup artist and hair stylist, at the cost to the American taxpayer of $6,364,000 for 4 years. These assistants’ sole duties are to facilitate her social life. She must be a lot more incompetent than first thought, since as First Ladies Hillary Clinton only had 3 assistants, Jacqueline Kennedy had 1 assistant, and Laura Bush had 1 assistant.

54. On June 9, 2011, Obama signed Executive Order 13575 establishing the “White House Rural Council” which establishes unchecked federal control into rural America in education, food supply, land use, water use, recreation, property, energy, and the lives of 16% of the US population. No Congressional or local government oversight or input. *

55. Obama’s handler’s establishment of the “Super Committee” is the final nail in our republic’s coffin, and the establishment of a Marxist dictatorship. Congress has always had committees which meet and return to the main body with ideas and suggestions, which is then amended, debated, rewritten, and finally voted on. Not this Super Committee, their determinations are presented to the Congress who are not allowed to discuss debate, modify, rewrite. The Congress is limited to a straight up or down vote. Why is the Congress accepting this infringement on their constitutional duties? *

56. Obama forced British Petroleum to set up $20 billion slush fund supposedly to compensate Gulf coast residents and businesses, and sets up an Obama appointee to administer funds with no judicial or congressional oversight. *

57. Obama’s cabal cancelled 77 oil field development contracts already certified as proper by the Bush administration. This deliberate affront by Obama’s Interior Secretary prevents the extraction of 3 trillion gallons of oil in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and North Dakota, which is more than enough to end our dependence on foreign oil. *

58. Obama signed the Russian-American START treaty which hampers US missile defense development and makes it difficult for us to modernize our rapidly aging nuclear weapons arsenal. It represents unilateral disarmament by the US in return for nothing more than Russian good will. What a joke.

59. Perhaps one of Obama’s most pathetic stunts was his chair of the UN Security Council, never done by a US sitting President. He was in the right place sitting as chair over an organization ruled by tyrants, and showing his true dual loyalties.

60. We need to look at Obama’s character, or in this case, his lack thereof. Obama is a total incognito with zero accomplishments. No experience, no education, no business sense or experience (only 8% of his entire administration has ever held a real job or run a business, other than being on the government dole), no military experience, a dangerous and treacherous narcissist, arrogant, incompetent, no class, serial liar, no humility, juvenile, no dignity, no genuine empathy, his personal narcissism and arrogance veiled by his hollow spoken empathy, quite ignorant, racist, Muslim, bereft of conscience, unable to determine between his fantasy and reality, incapable of genuine caring or concern, artificial, blames everyone else for his failure, and most of all Obama is a puppet, owned by his handlers, who maneuvered and manufactured his pathetic life.

61. Misuse of federal power and money in illegal international gun and drug running, the mis-distribution of taxpayer funds and manipulation of foreign governments, racketeering and smuggling, such as Project Gun Runner, resulting in the murder of U.S. agents.

NOTE: The items herein marked with an (*) at the end of the numbered statement, reflect a deliberate and malicious violation of the duties of the President as cited in Article II, Section 3. Of the United States Constitution, i.e. “…he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed…”.

##


244 posted on 10/21/2011 11:50:40 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Danae

And .. for whatever it’s worth, there’s a Tim Stanley Picasa album of news headlines of Obama’s ‘08 win:

http://picasaweb.google.com/110645180506395498416/ObamaWinsAsSeenOnTheWeb?gsessionid=ldxkUuk9sVYoPQMuwEB9ng

Looks like him

https://picasaweb.google.com/110645180506395498416/20110923#5655667604885830866

http://www.abajournal.com/legalrebels/article/tim_stanley_big_giver/


245 posted on 10/21/2011 11:51:18 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

To see most all of what this overlord has already done .. simply jaw dropping. And graphic evidence of his true mission and method: overwhelm the country with his dictates, one after another, after another to the ultimate destruction of the United States of America.

I pray this protest gets wide notification, and that these brave folks storm DC in numbers that can’t be ignored. God bless them .. God save America, with the help of our brave warriors for freedom.


246 posted on 10/22/2011 12:21:47 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

(Shudder).... you are a cruel woman!! Lol;) ick. Ickickick... bleck.


247 posted on 10/22/2011 2:05:21 AM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

His dogs are really cute. I have to give him that.


248 posted on 10/22/2011 2:07:24 AM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

103 is sort of alot of screenshots. That’s a little bit of work there. Must have meant something to him.


249 posted on 10/22/2011 2:10:54 AM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: bushwon

Maybe. Maybe he will see this.


250 posted on 10/22/2011 2:12:59 AM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-289 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson