Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

Keep up the good work. If all it took were skeptics without a mathematical analysis to disprove an observation, then ball lightning couldn’t exist and all those who’ve seen it would be labeled as kooks.

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html

Here’s another mystery for the real kooks to chew on. It is a Stanford University News article entitled: The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements. Let the blazing wizards of this thread engage in a rabid denial that there is a link between solar activity and nuclear decay rates since there is no known mechanism.


63 posted on 11/26/2011 10:54:32 PM PST by Sundog (When Hollywood defines reality there is no reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Sundog
Here’s another mystery for the real kooks to chew on. It is a Stanford University News article entitled: The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements.
The difference between something like this and Rossi's gadget is that these Stanford researchers won't refuse to let other researchers try to duplicate their work.

And they certainly won't threaten to put "self destruct" mechanisms in their test equipment to prevent anyone else from testing their claims.

And, they probably don't have a history of fraud convictions, as does Rossi.

64 posted on 11/27/2011 5:30:33 AM PST by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson