Posted on 12/01/2011 9:48:36 AM PST by Lazlo in PA
Yes, Newt Gingrich is more dangerous to the well-being of the United States, and our people, than Barack Obama. That’s a strong statement, and I intend to prove it!
There are many ways to prove this.
I’ll use Newt’s actual voting record, as well as his many positions that run counter to what’s best for the Republic. I’ll also talk about his abilities to persuade otherwise intelligent people to follow him into the abyss.
You see it’s this ability to take the hard left’s positions, and carefully re-word them, making them sound like “conservative” positions, that makes Newt such a threat. Newt knows the language of the Conservative, though he’s never been one. He knows the words that excite the Conservative mind. And this is the real key to it all.
We’ll get to Newt’s lengthy record as a “progessive” in due time, but I want readers to fully understand it’s Newt’s highly developed skills as a con man that should worry all Americans. It’s THE reason his is so dangerous.
Barack Obama is a communist. He’s the most radical president we’ve ever elected. More radical than “progessives” Teddy or Franklin Roosevelt, more radical than LBJ or Carter. The nation’s only saving grace is: Obama is a bumbling fool, who can barely string two sentences together.
Obama has little skill in actual governing, so as bad as he is, much of his agenda [thankfully] hasn’t come to pass. Obama isn’t a leader, and simply can’t get things done. He’s also a bit on the lazy side, and would rather just go play and enjoy the all the perks that come with the office.
(Excerpt) Read more at thespeechatimeforchoosing.wordpress.com ...
List of people that you would deem acceptable:
1. Jesus
________________________________________________________
He’s already in Charge. I use Jesus’ guidance to decern not the MSM.
I agree, but it looks like all we are going to get to ‘choose’ is from are these two-the system is rigged!
The source is a fool and doesn’t bring up any good points other than that they’re an idiot.
Your source should take a course in logic. Thereafter a course in rhetoric (perhaps writing, style and all that whatnot-nonsense,eh?).
Maybe after that they’d have the intellectual means to make a point.
On November 18, 2010, Gingrich delivered a speech before the Republican Governors Association Conference in San Diego outlining 12 steps for what he called a “Replacement of the Left” strategy. In his speech, Gingrich said that the Republican election day victories of 2009 and 2010 should be followed by further victories over the next two years that would give his party a large enough majority to replace what he called an increasingly leftist political system that has dominated American politics since 1932, largely through the influence of unelected bureaucracies. According to Gingrich, the strategy would be best pursued at the local level by lawmakers and activists in all 50 states rather than relying on leaders in Washington, D.C.[6]
Do you? Really? Heh... I kinda doubt it.
After this is said and done those on my side will see their positions and influence greatly enhanced. Your gonna make us look like F’ing prophets, because EVERYTHING we are saying will come to pass. how can it not? Everything were saying about N00t and mitt is absolutly true.
Snarkasm in the form of pictures won’t make your guy not be a raging F’ing progressive.
Id rather dive head first into the abyss than skirt the edge of tyranny for ever.
Perhaps we can gain enough momentum on the way down to come out the other side with our freedom and the tyrants in prison, exile or unmarked graves.
Why will I have forfited the right to complain about socialism if I refuse to vote for a socialist? Are you under the assumption that just because the GOP backs someone they can’t be a socialist? Lol...
You fail at logic.
I wish I knew.
However, I CAN tell you that the angry conservative mobs won’t support n00t or mitt any more than they supported mccain or dole.
Take this for what it is. A warning to get an actual limited government conservative on the ballot. He doesn’t have to be perfect. He just can’t be any form of socialist.
Long article based on a BS premise. The author should be ashamed. This means that Gingrich only "sounds" conservative, and that makes him more dangerous than a closet communist?
Let me say it first:
Bachmann only "sounds" conservative. Secretly she's Russian spy Natasha.
Perry only "sounds" conservative. Secretly he's Boris Badenough
Santorum only "sounds" conservative. In his secret life he's a Bill Ayers clone with a bomb throwing wife with a dozen kids who are actually called the "tiny terrorist team".
Cain only "sounds" conservative. In his other secret life, he's team leader for a Che Guevara hit team in the jungles of Columbia.
Paul only "sounds" conservative. Secretly, he's a presidential candidate in favor of an Iranian bomb.
Here is where you thin argument falls apart. Newt is the only one who has consistently saddled up with Marxist the last couple years. Taking their flawed premises, accepting them and then giving some pseudo Conservative solution to them. Utter nonsense.
On education.
On Global Warming.
On Health Care.
The Conservative running don't have this history of defaulting consistently to a Progressive position at the drop of a hat. When asked about these glaring examples, all Newt has to say is it was a big mistake. What is going to stop him from pulling a Nixon in office and doing the same stuff again? Talking Conservative yet giving us all sorts of other big Gov't nonsense.
Please, stop trying to fool the forum that you were ever a conservative. We already know your polling ballots have down ticket spots, not just the presidential spot.
Welcome to the United Soviet States of America..where the Pravda State Media “vet” the candidates to the pleasure and needs of the RinoCrat UniParty.
This “election” will be a non-election...featuring the state approved “candidates”-whose only distinction is whether they are black or white.
You are the typical lying agitprop. You claim ‘the last two years’, then post a picture from 1992 for your ‘proof’ regarding healthcare. Liars like you are working for either Rominy of the DNC. And the more you post the better the clearer that becomes. You’re a lying agitprop.
Hey, you can post your tired CFS pic over at a Cain thread from last night where I said his campaign is over because he lied to his wife. That should excite you. I’ll give up my principles in the General when I vote to throw out Obummer. Until then I am going to call these candidates out for their nonsense. We don’t need to run another RINO.
Really?
America is failing because JO’s like you have tolerated and even allied themselves with the socialists.
Everyone here knows Im right. Everyone here knows your just another hack for the GOP progressive “elite”.
Bwahahahahaha ... not even a good try, agitprop.
You are very high. Either Newt or Romney will be better than Obama. Would there be problems and flip flops? Sure. But Obama has been a disaster, the worst president in my lifetime, as bad a Jimmy Carter.
Also...
Your willing to Sabotage those down ballot slots by putting a BIG GOVERNMENT PROGRESSIVE on the friggen ballot!
There will be no excitement to go vote, therefore the voter turnout will be depressed and the down ballot candidates will see fewer votes.
This is all history. This is what happens. Proven fact. You idiots cant change that through sarcasm and snarks.
Romney will be more dangerous, because he is more adept at disguising his socialist tendencies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.